Silvio Garattini1, Vittorio Bertelé, Rita Banzi. 1. Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Via Giuseppe La Masa 19, 20156 Milan, Italy. silvio.garattini@marionegri.it
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential damage to patients from the inappropriate use of placebo. METHODS: Pivotal clinical trials of new drugs were evaluated for the treatment of multiple sclerosis following effective treatment with beta interferons and glatiramer acetate. The differences in the relapse rate between the experimental arms of the trials with interferons and glatiramer and the placebo groups were calculated. RESULTS: In ten pivotal trials, 2,752 patients were given placebo instead of the best proven treatments. The annualized relapse rate was reported for 2,405 of these patients. Patients receiving placebo suffered 630 more relapses than those treated with interferons or glatiramer. CONCLUSIONS: The inappropriate use of placebo in clinical trials unduly harms patients. The use of standard active comparators would preserve patients' rights and better define the respective clinical value of new medicines.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential damage to patients from the inappropriate use of placebo. METHODS: Pivotal clinical trials of new drugs were evaluated for the treatment of multiple sclerosis following effective treatment with beta interferons and glatiramer acetate. The differences in the relapse rate between the experimental arms of the trials with interferons and glatiramer and the placebo groups were calculated. RESULTS: In ten pivotal trials, 2,752 patients were given placebo instead of the best proven treatments. The annualized relapse rate was reported for 2,405 of these patients. Patients receiving placebo suffered 630 more relapses than those treated with interferons or glatiramer. CONCLUSIONS: The inappropriate use of placebo in clinical trials unduly harms patients. The use of standard active comparators would preserve patients' rights and better define the respective clinical value of new medicines.
Authors: Andrew D Goodman; Theodore R Brown; Keith R Edwards; Lauren B Krupp; Randall T Schapiro; Ron Cohen; Lawrence N Marinucci; Andrew R Blight Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Paul O'Connor; Jerry S Wolinsky; Christian Confavreux; Giancarlo Comi; Ludwig Kappos; Tomas P Olsson; Hadj Benzerdjeb; Philippe Truffinet; Lin Wang; Aaron Miller; Mark S Freedman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-10-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ludwig Kappos; Ernst-Wilhelm Radue; Paul O'Connor; Chris Polman; Reinhard Hohlfeld; Peter Calabresi; Krzysztof Selmaj; Catherine Agoropoulou; Malgorzata Leyk; Lixin Zhang-Auberson; Pascale Burtin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-01-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: L D Jacobs; D L Cookfair; R A Rudick; R M Herndon; J R Richert; A M Salazar; J S Fischer; D E Goodkin; C V Granger; J H Simon; J J Alam; D M Bartoszak; D N Bourdette; J Braiman; C M Brownscheidle; M E Coats; S L Cohan; D S Dougherty; R P Kinkel; M K Mass; F E Munschauer; R L Priore; P M Pullicino; B J Scherokman; R H Whitham Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 1996-03 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Hans-Peter Hartung; Richard Gonsette; Nikolaus König; Hubert Kwiecinski; Andreas Guseo; Sean P Morrissey; Hilmar Krapf; Thomas Zwingers Journal: Lancet Date: 2002 Dec 21-28 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: P D Molyneux; L Kappos; C Polman; C Pozzilli; F Barkhof; M Filippi; T Yousry; D Hahn; K Wagner; M Ghazi; K Beckmann; F Dahlke; N Losseff; G J Barker; A J Thompson; D H Miller Journal: Brain Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 13.501