Literature DB >> 22983270

Major postoperative complications after benign gynecologic surgery: a clinical prediction tool.

Elisabeth A Erekson1, Sallis O Yip, Deanna K Martin, Maria M Ciarleglio, Kathleen A Connell, Terri R Fried.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to create a clinical prediction tool to differentiate women at risk for postoperative complications after benign gynecologic surgery.
METHODS: We utilized the 2005 to 2009 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program participant use data files to perform a secondary data-set analysis of women older than 16 years who underwent benign gynecologic procedures. We then temporally divided women into 2 similar cohorts. Our derivation cohort included all women undergoing benign gynecologic procedures in 2005 to 2008. Our validation cohort included all women undergoing benign gynecologic procedures in 2009. The primary outcome, composite 30-day major postoperative complications, was analyzed as a dichotomous variable. A prediction tool was then constructed to predict the occurrence of postoperative complications built from the logistic regression model by rounding the value of each estimated β coefficient to the nearest integer. An individual's risk score was then computed by summing the number of points based on her preoperative characteristics. This risk score was then used to categorize women into low-, medium-, and high-risk groups.
RESULTS: A prediction tool for benign gynecologic procedures identified women at low (2.7% and 2.4%), medium (6.3% and 6.8%), and high (29.5% and 23.8%) risk of complications in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: A prediction tool can differentiate women at risk for postoperative complications after benign gynecologic surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22983270      PMCID: PMC3631542          DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e318263a210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 2151-8378            Impact factor:   2.091


  16 in total

1.  Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery.

Authors:  T H Lee; E R Marcantonio; C M Mangione; E J Thomas; C A Polanczyk; E F Cook; D J Sugarbaker; M C Donaldson; R Poss; K K Ho; L E Ludwig; A Pedan; L Goldman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-09-07       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Users' guides to the medical literature: XXII: how to use articles about clinical decision rules. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

Authors:  T G McGinn; G H Guyatt; P C Wyer; C D Naylor; I G Stiell; W S Richardson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-07-05       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  ACC/AHA guideline update for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery--executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1996 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery).

Authors:  Kim A Eagle; Peter B Berger; Hugh Calkins; Bernard R Chaitman; Gordon A Ewy; Kirsten E Fleischmann; Lee A Fleisher; James B Froehlich; Richard J Gusberg; Jeffrey A Leppo; Thomas Ryan; Robert C Schlant; William L Winters; Raymond J Gibbons; Elliott M Antman; Joseph S Alpert; David P Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Gabriel Gregoratos; Alice K Jacobs; Loren F Hiratzka; Richard O Russell; Sidney C Smith
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-02-06       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Postoperative complications after gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Erekson; Sallis O Yip; Maria M Ciarleglio; Terri R Fried
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Design and statistical methodology of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: why is it what it is?

Authors:  William G Henderson; Jennifer Daley
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 6.  Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults--The Evidence Report. National Institutes of Health.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  1998-09

Review 7.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Preoperative hematocrit levels and postoperative outcomes in older patients undergoing noncardiac surgery.

Authors:  Wen-Chih Wu; Tracy L Schifftner; William G Henderson; Charles B Eaton; Roy M Poses; Georgette Uttley; Satish C Sharma; Michael Vezeridis; Shukri F Khuri; Peter D Friedmann
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Perioperative complications in obese women vs normal-weight women who undergo vaginal surgery.

Authors:  Chi Chiung Grace Chen; Sarah A Collins; Allison K Rodgers; Marie Fidela R Paraiso; Mark D Walters; Matthew D Barber
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  A clinical prediction rule for delirium after elective noncardiac surgery.

Authors:  E R Marcantonio; L Goldman; C M Mangione; L E Ludwig; B Muraca; C M Haslauer; M C Donaldson; A D Whittemore; D J Sugarbaker; R Poss
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-01-12       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator in Gynecologic Oncology Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Authors:  Deanna Teoh; Rebi Nahum Halloway; Jennifer Heim; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Colleen Rivard
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 4.137

2.  Development of a Preoperative Clinical Risk Assessment Tool for Postoperative Complications After Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Payton C Schmidt; Neil S Kamdar; Elisabeth Erekson; Carolyn W Swenson; Shitanshu Uppal; Daniel M Morgan
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 4.137

3.  Prediction model for 30-day morbidity after gynecological malignancy surgery.

Authors:  Seung-Hyuk Shim; Sun Joo Lee; Meari Dong; Jung Hwa Suh; Seo Yeon Kim; Ji Hye Lee; Soo-Nyung Kim; Soon-Beom Kang; Jayoun Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.