Literature DB >> 22982965

Temporary left ventricular stimulation in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock and asynchronous left ventricular contraction: a safety and feasibility study.

Charlotte Eitel1, Thomas Gaspar, Kerstin Bode, Bruno Andrea, Philipp Sommer, Carsten Stoepel, Thomas Sarwas, Eigk Grebe, Holger Thiele, Gerhard Hindricks, Christopher Piorkowski.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite modern treatment strategies, cardiogenic shock (CS) is still associated with high mortality.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of temporary percutaneous left ventricular (LV) stimulation as rescue therapy in patients with CS refractory to standard clinical care.
METHODS: Consecutive patients with deteriorating CS without further treatment options received transjugular placement of a temporary LV lead if they exhibited signs of asynchronous LV contraction. To maintain atrioventricular synchronous contraction, an additional right atrial lead was placed in patients with sinus rhythm. The leads were externally connected to a conventional pacemaker. Hemodynamic course, clinical outcome, and adverse events were assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 15 patients [ischemic cardiomyopathy (n = 8), dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 6), and acute myocarditis (n = 1)] underwent successful lead placement. Median procedure and fluoroscopy times measured 60 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 55-90) and 12 minutes (IQR 7-34), respectively. Ten patients (67%) acutely responded by improvement of hemodynamic parameters with simultaneous reduction of catecholamine support. Catecholamine therapy was discontinued after a median of 28 hours (IQR 16-60). The temporary leads were removed after a median of 6 days (IQR 3-10). Total in-hospital mortality was 47%, measuring 80% in nonresponders and 30% in responders (P = .119). There was no therapy-related serious adverse event.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that there may be a role for temporary LV stimulation as rescue therapy in selected patients with refractory CS. In clinical situations where aggressive therapies are used for urgent hemodynamic stabilization, temporary LV stimulation may evolve as a further and less invasive treatment option.
Copyright © 2013 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22982965     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  4 in total

1.  Efficacy of cardiac resynchronization in acutely infarcted canine hearts with electromechanical dyssynchrony.

Authors:  Grant V Chow; Michael G Silverman; Richard S Tunin; Albert C Lardo; Saman Nazarian; David A Kass
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 6.343

2.  Experts' recommendations for the management of adult patients with cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Bruno Levy; Olivier Bastien; Bendjelid Karim; Karim Benjelid; Alain Cariou; Tahar Chouihed; Alain Combes; Alexandre Mebazaa; Bruno Megarbane; Patrick Plaisance; Alexandre Ouattara; Christian Spaulding; Christian Splaulding; Jean-Louis Teboul; Fabrice Vanhuyse; Thierry Boulain; Kaldoun Kuteifan
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 6.925

3.  Treatment of refractory vasospastic angina complicated by acute pulmonary oedema with levosimendan: a case report.

Authors:  Marco Moltrasio; Nicola Cosentino; Edoardo Conte; Jeness Campodonico; Giancarlo Marenzi
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2019-02-05

4.  Temporary coronary sinus pacing to improve ventricular dyssynchrony with cardiogenic shock: A case report.

Authors:  Teressa Reanne Ju; Hsin Tseng; Hsin-Ti Lin; Alexander Lee Wang; Chi Chan Lee; Yi-Ching Lai
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 1.337

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.