Literature DB >> 22982601

Targeted mutagenesis of the Clostridium acetobutylicum acetone-butanol-ethanol fermentation pathway.

Clare M Cooksley1, Ying Zhang, Hengzheng Wang, Stephanie Redl, Klaus Winzer, Nigel P Minton.   

Abstract

The production of the chemical solvents acetone and butanol by the bacterium Clostridium acetobutylicum was one of the first large-scale industrial processes to be developed, and in the first part of the last century ranked second in importance only to ethanol production. After a steep decline in its industrial use, there has been a recent resurgence of interest in the acetone-butanol-ethanol (ABE) fermentation process, with a particular emphasis on butanol production. In order to generate strains suitable for efficient use on an industrial scale, metabolic engineering is required to alter the AB ratio in favour of butanol, and eradicate the production of unwanted products of fermentation. Using ClosTron technology, a large-scale targeted mutagenesis in C. acetobutylicum ATCC 824 was carried out, generating a set of 10 mutants, defective in alcohol/aldehyde dehydrogenases 1 and 2 (adhE1, adhE2), butanol dehydrogenases A and B (bdhA, bdhB), phosphotransbutyrylase (ptb), acetate kinase (ack), acetoacetate decarboxylase (adc), CoA transferase (ctfA/ctfB), and a previously uncharacterised putative alcohol dehydrogenase (CAP0059). However, inactivation of the main hydrogenase (hydA) and thiolase (thl) could not be achieved. Constructing such a series of mutants is paramount for the acquisition of information on the mechanism of solvent production in this organism, and the subsequent development of industrial solvent producing strains. Unexpectedly, bdhA and bdhB mutants did not affect solvent production, whereas inactivation of the previously uncharacterised gene CAP0059 resulted in increased acetone, butanol, and ethanol formation. Other mutants showed predicted phenotypes, including a lack of acetone formation (adc, ctfA, and ctfB mutants), an inability to take up acids (ctfA and ctfB mutants), and a much reduced acetate formation (ack mutant). The adhE1 mutant in particular produced very little solvents, demonstrating that this gene was indeed the main contributor to ethanol and butanol formation under the standard batch culture conditions employed in this study. All phenotypic changes observed could be reversed by genetic complementation, with exception of those seen for the ptb mutant. This mutant produced around 100 mM ethanol, no acetone and very little (7 mM) butanol. The genome of the ptb mutant was therefore re-sequenced, together with its parent strain (ATCC 824 wild type), and shown to possess a frameshift mutation in the thl gene, which perfectly explained the observed phenotype. This finding reinforces the need for mutant complementation and Southern Blot analysis (to confirm single ClosTron insertions), which should be obligatory in all further ClosTron applications.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22982601     DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2012.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Metab Eng        ISSN: 1096-7176            Impact factor:   9.783


  24 in total

1.  A CRISPR/Anti-CRISPR Genome Editing Approach Underlines the Synergy of Butanol Dehydrogenases in Clostridium acetobutylicum DSM 792.

Authors:  François Wasels; Gwladys Chartier; Rémi Hocq; Nicolas Lopes Ferreira
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Molecular control of gene expression by Brucella BaaR, an IclR-type transcriptional repressor.

Authors:  Julien Herrou; Daniel M Czyż; Aretha Fiebig; Jonathan W Willett; Youngchang Kim; Ruiying Wu; Gyorgy Babnigg; Sean Crosson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  The Draft Genome Sequence of a Novel High-Efficient Butanol-Producing Bacterium Clostridium Diolis Strain WST.

Authors:  Chaoyang Chen; Chongran Sun; Yi-Rui Wu
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  Model-based driving mechanism analysis for butyric acid production in Clostridium tyrobutyricum.

Authors:  Jun Feng; Xiaolong Guo; Feifei Cai; Hongxin Fu; Jufang Wang
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod       Date:  2022-06-25

5.  Improvement of butanol production in Clostridium acetobutylicum through enhancement of NAD(P)H availability.

Authors:  Feng Qi; Chandresh Thakker; Fayin Zhu; Matthew Pena; Ka-Yiu San; George N Bennett
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.346

6.  Deletion of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gapN) in Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum N1-4(HMT) using CLEAVE™ increases the ATP pool and accelerates solvent production.

Authors:  Taylor I Monaghan; Joseph A Baker; Preben Krabben; E Timothy Davies; Elizabeth R Jenkinson; Ian B Goodhead; Gary K Robinson; Mark Shepherd
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2021-12-19       Impact factor: 6.575

7.  Comparison of transcriptional profiles of Clostridium thermocellum grown on cellobiose and pretreated yellow poplar using RNA-Seq.

Authors:  Hui Wei; Yan Fu; Lauren Magnusson; John O Baker; Pin-Ching Maness; Qi Xu; Shihui Yang; Andrew Bowersox; Igor Bogorad; Wei Wang; Melvin P Tucker; Michael E Himmel; Shi-You Ding
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Biotechnological applications of mobile group II introns and their reverse transcriptases: gene targeting, RNA-seq, and non-coding RNA analysis.

Authors:  Peter J Enyeart; Georg Mohr; Andrew D Ellington; Alan M Lambowitz
Journal:  Mob DNA       Date:  2014-01-13

9.  Capturing the response of Clostridium acetobutylicum to chemical stressors using a regulated genome-scale metabolic model.

Authors:  Satyakam Dash; Thomas J Mueller; Keerthi P Venkataramanan; Eleftherios T Papoutsakis; Costas D Maranas
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 6.040

10.  A novel arabinose-inducible genetic operation system developed for Clostridium cellulolyticum.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Ya-Jun Liu; Gu-Zhen Cui; Qiu Cui
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 6.040

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.