Literature DB >> 22982426

Reduction in hospital admission rates due to post-prostate biopsy infections after augmenting standard antibiotic prophylaxis.

Mehrad Adibi1, Brad Hornberger, Deepa Bhat, Ganesh Raj, Claus G Roehrborn, Yair Lotan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the incidence of infectious complications requiring hospitalization after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy, comparing an augmented regimen of antibiotic prophylaxis to the standard regimen, and established cost-effectiveness at our center.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our standard antibiotic prophylaxis regimen consisted of 3 days of ciprofloxacin or Bactrim™ DS in the perioperative period. An increase in hospital admissions related to infection after transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy from January 2010 through December 2010 led us to initiate an augmented regimen of 3 days of ciprofloxacin or Bactrim DS in addition to 1 dose of intramuscular gentamicin before biopsy from January 2011 to December 2011. Urine and blood cultures along with bacterial susceptibilities were obtained at admission and compared between the 2 groups. Cost analysis was done to determine the cost-effectiveness of standard and augmented regimens.
RESULTS: The rate of hospitalization due to post-biopsy infections was 3.8% (11 patients among 290 biopsies) in 2010, which decreased to 0.6% (2 patients among 310 biopsies) in 2011 (p <0.001). Of the admitted patients who received standard prophylaxis, 73% had fluoroquinolone resistant Escherichia coli urinary infection and/or bacteremia and only 9% had strains resistant to gentamicin. Multivariate analysis showed that the standard regimen was significantly associated with hospital admission due to post-biopsy infection (HR 2.078 ± 0.84, p = 0.013). The augmented regimen resulted in a cost savings of $15,700 per 100 patients compared to the standard regimen.
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of gentamicin to current prophylactic regimens significantly reduced the rate of hospitalization for post-biopsy infectious complications and was shown to be cost-effective.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22982426     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  28 in total

1.  Chemoprophylaxis during transrectal prostate needle biopsy: critical analysis through randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Ahmed M Elshal; Ahmed M Atwa; Ahmed R El-Nahas; Mohamed A El-Ghar; Asaad Gaber; Essam Elsawy; Abdelwahab Hashem; Yasser Farag; Hashim Farg; Ali Elsorougy; Mohamed Fouda; Hossam Nabeeh; Ahmed Mosbah
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Prevention and treatment of biopsy-related complications.

Authors:  Ramgopal Satyanarayana; Dipen Parekh
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  An antimicrobial prophylaxis protocol using rectal swab cultures for transrectal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Stephen J Summers; Darshan P Patel; Blake D Hamilton; Angela P Presson; Mark A Fisher; William T Lowrance; Andrew W Southwick
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-05-03       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  CUA Guidelines on antibiotic prophylaxis for urologic procedures.

Authors:  Marko Mrkobrada; Ivan Ying; Stephanie Mokrycke; George Dresser; Sameer Elsayed; Varunkumar Bathini; Erin Boyce; Patrick Luke
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 5.  The augmented prophylactic antibiotic could be more efficacious in patients undergoing transrectal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lu Yang; Zhuang Tang; Liang Gao; Tao Li; Yongji Chen; Liangren Liu; Ping Han; Xiang Li; Qiang Dong; Qiang Wei
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Reducing Infectious Complications Following Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jordon T Walker; Nirmish Singla; Claus G Roehrborn
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2016

7.  Comparative Effectiveness of Single versus Combination Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Infections after Transrectal Prostate Biopsy.

Authors:  Kaylee Marino; Anne Parlee; Ralph Orlando; Lori Lerner; Judith Strymish; Kalpana Gupta
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  The effectiveness of targeted relative to empiric prophylaxis on infectious complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Susan Scott; Patrick N Harris; Deborah A Williamson; Michael A Liss; Suhail A R Doi; Matthew J Roberts
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Emergency hospital admissions attributable to infective complications of prostate biopsy despite appropriate prophylaxis: need for additional infection prevention strategies?

Authors:  G Gopal Rao; Deepak Batura
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-08-10       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Incidence of infectious complications following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in Calgary, Alberta, Canada: A retrospective population-based analysis.

Authors:  Jan Krzysztof Rudzinski; Jun Kawakami
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.