Literature DB >> 22982358

Binary classification of ¹⁸F-flutemetamol PET using machine learning: comparison with visual reads and structural MRI.

Rik Vandenberghe1, Natalie Nelissen, Eric Salmon, Adrian Ivanoiu, Steen Hasselbalch, Allan Andersen, Alex Korner, Lennart Minthon, David J Brooks, Koen Van Laere, Patrick Dupont.   

Abstract

(18)F-flutemetamol is a positron emission tomography (PET) tracer for in vivo amyloid imaging. The ability to classify amyloid scans in a binary manner as 'normal' versus 'Alzheimer-like', is of high clinical relevance. We evaluated whether a supervised machine learning technique, support vector machines (SVM), can replicate the assignments made by visual readers blind to the clinical diagnosis, which image components have highest diagnostic value according to SVM and how (18)F-flutemetamol-based classification using SVM relates to structural MRI-based classification using SVM within the same subjects. By means of SVM with a linear kernel, we analyzed (18)F-flutemetamol scans and volumetric MRI scans from 72 cases from the (18)F-flutemetamol phase 2 study (27 clinically probable Alzheimer's disease (AD), 20 amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 25 controls). In a leave-one-out approach, we trained the (18)F-flutemetamol based classifier by means of the visual reads and tested whether the classifier was able to reproduce the assignment based on visual reads and which voxels had the highest feature weights. The (18)F-flutemetamol based classifier was able to replicate the assignments obtained by visual reads with 100% accuracy. The voxels with highest feature weights were in the striatum, precuneus, cingulate and middle frontal gyrus. Second, to determine concordance between the gray matter volume- and the (18)F-flutemetamol-based classification, we trained the classifier with the clinical diagnosis as gold standard. Overall sensitivity of the (18)F-flutemetamol- and the gray matter volume-based classifiers were identical (85.2%), albeit with discordant classification in three cases. Specificity of the (18)F-flutemetamol based classifier was 92% compared to 68% for MRI. In the MCI group, the (18)F-flutemetamol based classifier distinguished more reliably between converters and non-converters than the gray matter-based classifier. The visual read-based binary classification of (18)F-flutemetamol scans can be replicated using SVM. In this sample the specificity of (18)F-flutemetamol based SVM for distinguishing AD from controls is higher than that of gray matter volume-based SVM.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22982358     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  21 in total

1.  Yes we can analyse amyloid images - Now What?

Authors:  Henryk Barthel; John Seibyl; Osama Sabri
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  A review on neuroimaging-based classification studies and associated feature extraction methods for Alzheimer's disease and its prodromal stages.

Authors:  Saima Rathore; Mohamad Habes; Muhammad Aksam Iftikhar; Amanda Shacklett; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Comparison of Three Automated Approaches for Classification of Amyloid-PET Images.

Authors:  Ying-Hwey Nai; Yee-Hsin Tay; Tomotaka Tanaka; Christopher P Chen; Edward G Robins; Anthonin Reilhac
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2022-05-27

4.  Insight on AV-45 binding in white and grey matter from histogram analysis: a study on early Alzheimer's disease patients and healthy subjects.

Authors:  Federico Nemmi; Laure Saint-Aubert; Djilali Adel; Anne-Sophie Salabert; Jérémie Pariente; Emmanuel J Barbeau; Pierre Payoux; Patrice Péran
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Can CT-based radiomics signature predict KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Lei Yang; Di Dong; Mengjie Fang; Yongbei Zhu; Yali Zang; Zhenyu Liu; Hongmei Zhang; Jianming Ying; Xinming Zhao; Jie Tian
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Imaging β-amyloid using [(18)F]flutemetamol positron emission tomography: from dosimetry to clinical diagnosis.

Authors:  Kerstin Heurling; Antoine Leuzy; Eduardo R Zimmer; Mark Lubberink; Agneta Nordberg
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  The relationship between amyloid deposition, neurodegeneration, and cognitive decline in dementia.

Authors:  Rik Vandenberghe
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 5.081

8.  The clinical feasibility of deep learning-based classification of amyloid PET images in visually equivocal cases.

Authors:  Hye Joo Son; Jungsu S Oh; Minyoung Oh; Soo Jong Kim; Jae-Hong Lee; Jee Hoon Roh; Jae Seung Kim
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  A New Initialization Approach in Particle Swarm Optimization for Global Optimization Problems.

Authors:  Waqas Haider Bangyal; Abdul Hameed; Wael Alosaimi; Hashem Alyami
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-17

10.  Amyloid PET in European and North American cohorts; and exploring age as a limit to clinical use of amyloid imaging.

Authors:  Konstantinos Chiotis; Stephen F Carter; Karim Farid; Irina Savitcheva; Agneta Nordberg
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.