Literature DB >> 22981767

The influence of the number of cells scored on the sensitivity in the comet assay.

Anoop Kumar Sharma1, Françoise Soussaline, Jerome Sallette, Marianne Dybdahl.   

Abstract

The impact on the sensitivity of the in vitro comet assay by increasing the number of cells scored has only been addressed in a few studies. The present study investigated whether the sensitivity of the assay could be improved by scoring more than 100 cells. Two cell lines and three different chemicals were used: Caco-2 cells were exposed to ethylmethane sulfonate and hydrogen peroxide in three concentrations, and HepG2 cells were exposed to ethylmethane sulfonate, hydrogen peroxide and benzo[a]pyrene in up to four concentrations, in four to five independent experiments. The scoring was carried out by means of a fully automated scoring system and the results were analyzed by evaluating the % tail DNA of 100-700 randomly selected cells for each slide consisting of two gels. By increasing the number of cells scored, the coefficients of variance decreased, leading to an improved sensitivity of the assay. A two-way ANOVA analysis of variance showed that the contribution from the two variables "the number of cells scored" and "concentration" on the total variation in the coefficients of variance dataset was statistically significant (p<0.05). The increase in sensitivity was demonstrated by the possibility to detect an increase in % tail DNA with statistical significance at lower concentrations. The results indicated that for low levels of DNA damage, below 9% tail DNA, scoring of 600 cells increased the sensitivity compared with scoring of 100 cells. For relatively low levels of DNA damage, about 9-16% tail DNA, scoring of 300 cells increased the sensitivity. Thus, the recommendation for the optimum number of cells scored would be 600 and 300 for low and relatively low levels of DNA damage, respectively. The findings from this study could be particularly important for bio-monitoring studies where small differences in DNA-damage levels could be relevant.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22981767     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2012.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  6 in total

1.  Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity induced by coal and coal fly ash particles samples in V79 cells.

Authors:  Grethel León-Mejía; Luis F O Silva; Matheus S Civeira; Marcos L S Oliveira; Miriana Machado; Izabel Vianna Villela; Andreas Hartmann; Suziane Premoli; Dione Silva Corrêa; Juliana Da Silva; João Antônio Pêgas Henriques
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Micropatterned comet assay enables high throughput and sensitive DNA damage quantification.

Authors:  Jing Ge; Danielle N Chow; Jessica L Fessler; David M Weingeist; David K Wood; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 3.  High throughput sample processing and automated scoring.

Authors:  Gunnar Brunborg; Petra Jackson; Sergey Shaposhnikov; Hildegunn Dahl; Amaya Azqueta; Andrew R Collins; Kristine B Gutzkow
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Validation of freezing tissues and cells for analysis of DNA strand break levels by comet assay.

Authors:  Petra Jackson; Lourdes M Pedersen; Zdenka O Kyjovska; Nicklas R Jacobsen; Anne T Saber; Karin S Hougaard; Ulla Vogel; Håkan Wallin
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  OpenComet: an automated tool for comet assay image analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin M Gyori; Gireedhar Venkatachalam; P S Thiagarajan; David Hsu; Marie-Veronique Clement
Journal:  Redox Biol       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 11.799

6.  On the search for an intelligible comet assay descriptor.

Authors:  Peter Møller; Steffen Loft; Clara Ersson; Gudrun Koppen; Maria Dusinska; Andrew Collins
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 4.599

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.