Literature DB >> 22981468

The intermediate disturbance hypothesis should be abandoned.

Jeremy W Fox1.   

Abstract

A leading idea about how disturbances and other environmental fluctuations affect species diversity is the intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH). The IDH states that diversity of competing species is, or should be expected to be, maximized at intermediate frequencies and/or intensities of disturbance or environmental change. I argue that the IDH has been refuted on both empirical and theoretical grounds, and so should be abandoned. Empirical studies only rarely find the predicted humped diversity-disturbance relationship. Theoretically, the three major mechanisms thought to produce humped diversity-disturbance relationships are logically invalid and do not actually predict what they are thought to predict. Disturbances and other environmental fluctuations can affect diversity, but for different reasons than are commonly recognized.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22981468     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.08.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  51 in total

1.  Functional niche occupation and species richness in herbaceous plant communities along experimental gradients of stress and disturbance.

Authors:  Yuanzhi Li; Bill Shipley
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  The ghost of disturbance past: long-term effects of pulse disturbances on community biomass and composition.

Authors:  Claire Jacquet; Florian Altermatt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Defining Disturbance for Microbial Ecology.

Authors:  Craig J Plante
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Testing biodiversity theory using species richness of reef-building corals across a depth gradient.

Authors:  T Edward Roberts; Sally A Keith; Carsten Rahbek; Tom C L Bridge; M Julian Caley; Andrew H Baird
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Antagonistic effects of long- and short-term environmental variation on species coexistence.

Authors:  Ming Liu; Dustin R Rubenstein; Siew Ann Cheong; Sheng-Feng Shen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 5.530

6.  Exclusion of the fittest predicts microbial community diversity in fluctuating environments.

Authors:  Shota Shibasaki; Mauro Mobilia; Sara Mitri
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 4.293

7.  Do soil bacterial communities respond differently to abrupt or gradual additions of copper?

Authors:  Michael McTee; Lorinda Bullington; Matthias C Rillig; Philip W Ramsey
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 4.194

8.  Gut Microbiome Succession in Chinese Mitten Crab Eriocheir sinensis During Seawater-Freshwater Migration.

Authors:  Chenxi Shao; Wenqian Zhao; Nannan Li; Yinkang Li; Huiming Zhang; Jingjing Li; Zhiqiang Xu; Jianjun Wang; Tianheng Gao
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Matrix models for quantifying competitive intransitivity.

Authors:  Werner Ulrich; Santiago Soliveres; Wojciech Kryszewski; Fernando T Maestre; Nicholas J Gotelli
Journal:  Oikos       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.903

10.  High bee and wasp diversity in a heterogeneous tropical farming system compared to protected forest.

Authors:  Christof Schüepp; Sarah Rittiner; Martin H Entling
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.