| Literature DB >> 22980347 |
Lawrence Adekunle Adebusoye1, Olubunmi E Olapade-Olaopa, Modupe M Ladipo, Eme T Owoaje.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction (ED) has become a public health issue in Nigeria because of its increasing magnitude, association with chronic medical conditions and negative impact on sexual life.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22980347 PMCID: PMC4777012 DOI: 10.5539/gjhs.v4n4p107
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Glob J Health Sci ISSN: 1916-9736
Figure 1Severity of erectile dysfunction by age
Socio-demographic characteristics of respondents
| ED = 248, n (%) | No ED =202, n (%) | Total= 450, N (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18 – 30 | 58 (45.0) | 71 (55.0) | 129 (100.0) |
| 31 – 40 | 54 (47.0) | 61 (53.0) | 115 (100.0) |
| 41 – 50 | 48 (55.2) | 39 (44.8) | 87 (100.0) |
| 51 – 60 | 49 (73.1) | 18 (26.9) | 67 (100.0) |
| 61 – 70 | 39 (75.0) | 13 (25.0) | 52 (100.0) |
| χ2= 25.576, df = 4; p < 0.0001 | |||
| Married | 176 (57.3) | 131 (42.7) | 307 (100.0) |
| Single | 61 (46.9) | 69 (53.1) | 130 (100.0) |
| Separated or Divorced | 5 (83.3) | 1 (16.7) | 6 (100.0) |
| Widowed | 6 (85.7) | 1 (14.3) | 7 (100.0) |
| χ2=8.715, df=3; Fisher’s p=0.032 | |||
| Earned above $1 a day | 221 (57.6) | 163 (42.4) | 384 (100.0) |
| Earned below $1 a day | 27 (40.9) | 39 (59.1) | 66 (100.0) |
| χ2= 6.306, df = 1; p = 0.001 | |||
| I | 9 (90.0) | 1 (10.0) | 10 (100.0) |
| II | 54 (67.5) | 26 (32.5) | 80 (100.0) |
| III | 20 (64.5) | 11 (35.5) | 31 (100.0) |
| IV | 48 (45.7) | 57 (54.3) | 105 (100.0) |
| V | 117 (52.2) | 107 (47.8) | 224 (100.0) |
| χ2= 15.490, df = 4; p = 0.004 |
Significant at 5% level of significance
Lifestyle and physical characteristics
| ED = 248, n (%) | No ED =202, n (%) | Total =450, N (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | 48 (47.1) | 54 (52.9) | 102 (100.0) |
| No | 120 (57.7) | 88 (42.3) | 208 (100.0) |
| Quit | 80 (57.2) | 60 (42.8) | 140 (100.0) |
| χ2= 3.467, df = 2; p = 0.177 | |||
| Yes | 15 (57.7) | 11 (42.3) | 26 (100.0) |
| No | 179 (54.9) | 147 (45.1) | 326 (100.0) |
| Quit | 54 (55.1) | 44 (44.9) | 98 (100.0) |
| χ2= 0.075, df = 2; p = 0.963 | |||
| Yes | 4 (50.0) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (100.0) |
| No | 244 (54.7) | 202 (45.3) | 446 (100.0) |
| χ2= 1.711, df = 1; p = 0.191 (Yates’s corrected) | |||
| Yes | 25 (61.0) | 16 (39.0) | 41 (100.0) |
| No | 216(54.4) | 181 (45.6) | 397 (100.0) |
| Quit | 7 (58.3) | 5 (41.7) | 12 (100.0) |
| χ2= 0.700, df = 2; p = 0.705 | |||
| Not active | 53 70.7) | 22 (29.3) | 75 (100.0) |
| Moderately active | 133 (54.3) | 112 (45.7) | 245 (100.0) |
| Very active | 62 (47.7) | 68 (52.3) | 130 (100.0) |
| χ2= 10.296, df = 2; p = 0.006 | |||
| Underweight | 13 (40.6) | 19 (59.4) | 32 (100.0) |
| Normal | 166 52.5) | 150 (47.5) | 316 (100.0) |
| Overweight | 62 (71.3) | 25 (28.7) | 87 (100.0) |
| Obese | 7 (46.7) | 8 (53.3) | 15 (100.0) |
| χ2= 13.173, df = 3; p = 0.004 |
Significant at 5% level of significance
Clinical correlates of erectile dysfunction
| ED = 248 n (%) | No ED = 202 n (%) | Total = 450 N (%) | χ2 | p–value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypertension | 41 (70.7) | 17 (29.3) | 58 (100.0) | 6.532 | 0.011 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 24 (72.7) | 9 (27.3) | 33 (100.0) | 10.830 | 0.001 |
| Peptic ulcer Disease | 38 (70.4) | 16 (29.6) | 54 (100.0) | 15.455 | <0.0001 |
| Depression | 77 (59.2) | 53 (40.8) | 130(100.0) | 1.254 | 0.263 |
| Prostate surgery | 16 (76.2) | 5 (23.8) | 21 (100.0) | 3.957 | 0.047 |
| Antihypertensives | 12 (57.1) | 9 (42.9) | 21(100.0) | 0.037 | 0.848 |
| Antidepressants | 5 (83.3) | 1 (16.7) | 6 (100.0) | 0.972 (Yates’s corrected) | 0.324 |
| Peptic ulcer drugs | 4 (50.0) | 4 (50.0) | 8 (100.0) | 0.000 (Yates’s corrected) | 1.000 |
| Oral hypoglycemic agents | 7 (87.5) | 1 (12.5) | 8 (100.0) | 2.249(Yates’s corrected) | 0.134 |
Significant at 5% level of significance
Sexual life and partner(s)’ satisfaction (N=450)
| Extremely satisfied | Somewhat satisfied | Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied | Somewhat dissatisfied | Extremely dissatisfied | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Have ED (%) | 68 (36.1) | 77 (53.1) | 62 (84.9) | 24 (88.9) | 17 (100.0) |
| Have no ED (%) | 120 (63.9) | 68 (46.9) | 11(15.1) | 3 (11.1) | 0 (0.0) |
| Total (%) | 188(100.0) | 145(100.0) | 73 (100.0) | 27 (100.0) | 17 (100.0) |
| χ2= 80.039 df = 4 p < 0.0001 | |||||
| Have ED (%) | 86 (42.0) | 64 (48.1) | 62 (86.1) | 24 (96.0) | 12 (80.0) |
| Have no ED (%) | 119 (58.0) | 69 (51.9) | 10 (13.9) | 1 (4.0) | 3 (20.0) |
| Total (%) | 205(100.0) | 133(100.0) | 72 (100.0) | 25 (100.0) | 15 (100.0) |
| χ2= 65.599 df = 4 p < 0.0001 | |||||
| Have ED (%) | 79 (44.9) | 75 (47.8) | 61 (78.2) | 18 (85.7) | 15 (83.3) |
| Have no ED (%) | 97 (55.1) | 82 (52.2) | 17 (21.8) | 3 (14.3) | 3 (16.7) |
| Total (%) | 176(100.0) | 157(100.0) | 78 (100.0) | 21 (100.0) | 18 (100.0) |
| χ2= 41.418 df = 4 p < 0.0001 | |||||
Significant at 5% level of significance
Sexual activities with the partner(s)
| Desire for sexual activities | ED n=248(%) | No ED n=202(%) | Total N = 450(%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Less than i desired | 123 (80.9) | 29 (19.1) | 152 (100.0) |
| As much as i desired | 122 (41.5) | 172 (58.5) | 294 (100.0) |
| More than i desired | 3 (75.0) | 1 (25.0) | 4 (100.0) |
| χ2= 63.597 df = 2 p < 0.0001* | |||
Logistic regression analysis
| β | SE | Wald | df | p-value | Odds Ratio | Confidence Interval | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.279 | 0.193 | 2.088 | 1 | 0.148 | 1.322 | 0.905 – 1.930 | |
| 0.011 | 0.282 | 0.002 | 1 | 0.968 | 1.012 | 0.582 – 1.757 | |
| -0.425 | 0.344 | 1.529 | 1 | 0.216 | 0.654 | 0.333 – 1.282 | |
| 1.254 | 1.256 | 0.996 | 1 | 0.318 | 3.504 | 0.299 – 7.175 | |
| 0.989 | 0.398 | 6.180 | 1 | 0.013 | 2.689 | 1.233 – 5.866 | |
| 0.069 | 0.436 | 0.025 | 1 | 0.874 | 1.072 | 0.456 – 2.518 | |
| -0.447 | 0.307 | 2.117 | 1 | 0.146 | 0.639 | 0.350 – 1.168 | |
| 1.203 | 0.437 | 7.596 | 1 | 0.006 | 3.331 | 1.416 – 7.839 | |
| -2.682 | 0.903 | 8.833 | 1 | 0.003 |
Significant at 5% level of significance