Literature DB >> 22980171

A prospective study of the extraction and retention incidence of endodontically treated teeth with uncertain prognosis after endodontic referral.

Nestoras E Tzimpoulas1, Michalis G Alisafis, Giorgos N Tzanetakis, Evangelos G Kontakiotis.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The present study was conducted with the aim to assess the extraction and retention incidence of endodontically treated teeth with an uncertain prognosis after endodontic referral and to evaluate the factors related to the decision-making process.
METHODS: Two hundred seventy-five permanent teeth were clinically and radiographically evaluated by 3 experienced endodontists. The type of tooth, age and sex of the patients, the motive of referral, and the main chief complaint were the initial recorded data. The associations between extraction reasons and the patients' age and sex or tooth type were analyzed using the chi-square test.
RESULTS: Of the 275 teeth examined, 217 (79%) were finally extracted. The remaining 58 (21%) teeth were endodontically retreated and restored. A questionable clinical status was the main motive for endodontic referral (57.1%). The teeth most extracted were maxillary molars (36.2%) followed by mandibular molars (32.9%). The most prevalent reason for extraction was nonrestorable caries (37.1%). The majority of the teeth retained in the oral cavity needed surgical periodontal or endodontic management.
CONCLUSIONS: The most frequent reason responsible for the fate of endodontically treated teeth is the pronounced loss of dental tissues. Endodontic referral may aid in the survival of some carefully selected cases of endodontically treated teeth.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22980171     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.06.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  8 in total

1.  Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with a bulkfill flowable material and a resin composite.

Authors:  Almira Isufi; Gianluca Plotino; Nicola Maria Grande; Pietro Ioppolo; Luca Testarelli; Rossella Bedini; Dina Al-Sudani; Gianluca Gambarini
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2016-07-19

2.  Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth With Traditional Endodontic Access Cavity, Conservative Endodontic Access Cavity, Truss Endodontic Access Cavity, and Ninja Endodontic Access Cavity Designs: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Prasad Patil; Pooja Newase; Swapnil Pawar; Hasmukh Gosai; Dharmendra Shah; Sameer M Parhad
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-17

3.  Prevalence of referral reasons and clinical symptoms for endodontic referrals.

Authors:  Seonah Kim
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2014-06-23

4.  Effect of Hand and Rotary Instruments on the Fracture Resistance of Teeth: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Nisha Acharya; Md Riasat Hasan; Dashrath Kafle; Anil Chakradhar; Takashi Saito
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-29

5.  Assessment of extracting molars and premolars after root canal treatment: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Mazen Almasri
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2019-05-10

6.  COVID-19 pandemic: an opportunity to rethink the patients' pathway to an endodontist?

Authors:  D Maret; F Diemer; M Gurgel; N Telmon; F Savall; M Faruch; O A Peters
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 5.264

7.  Unilateral Maxillary First Molar Extraction in Class II Subdivision: An Unconventional Treatment Alternative.

Authors:  J W Booij; Christos Livas
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2016-04-21

8.  Incidence of periodontal compromise in teeth indicated for undergoing endodontic treatment: A clinical study.

Authors:  Ricardo Machado; Monique Muniz da Cunha; Daniel Comparin; Leopoldo Cosme-Silva; Eduardo Donato Eing Engelke Back; Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.