Literature DB >> 22979917

Integrating paleobiology, archeology, and history to inform biological conservation.

Torben C Rick1, Rowan Lockwood.   

Abstract

The search for novel approaches to establishing ecological baselines (reference conditions) is constrained by the fact that most ecological studies span the past few decades, at most, and investigate ecosystems that have been substantially altered by human activities for decades, centuries, or more. Paleobiology, archeology, and history provide historical ecological context for biological conservation, remediation, and restoration. We argue that linking historical ecology explicitly with conservation can help unify related disciplines of conservation paleobiology, conservation archeobiology, and environmental history. Differences in the spatial and temporal resolution and extent (scale) of prehistoric, historic, and modern ecological data remain obstacles to integrating historical ecology and conservation biology, but the prolonged temporal extents of historical ecological data can help establish more complete baselines for restoration, document a historical range of ecological variability, and assist in determining desired future conditions. We used the eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) fishery of the Chesapeake Bay (U.S.A.) to demonstrate the utility of historical ecological data for elucidating oyster conservation and the need for an approach to conservation that transcends disciplinary boundaries. Historical ecological studies from the Chesapeake have documented dramatic declines (as much as 99%) in oyster abundance since the early to mid-1800 s, changes in oyster size in response to different nutrient levels from the sixteenth to nineteenth centuries, and substantial reductions in oyster accretion rates (from 10 mm/year to effectively 0 mm/year) from the Late Holocene to modern times. Better integration of different historical ecological data sets and increased collaboration between paleobiologists, geologists, archeologists, environmental historians, and ecologists to create standardized research designs and methodologies will help unify prehistoric, historic, and modern time perspectives on biological conservation. ©2012 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22979917     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01920.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  33 in total

1.  Biology in the Anthropocene: Challenges and insights from young fossil records.

Authors:  Susan M Kidwell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Evidence of size-selective evolution in the fighting conch from prehistoric subsistence harvesting.

Authors:  Aaron O'Dea; Marian Lynne Shaffer; Douglas R Doughty; Thomas A Wake; Felix A Rodriguez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Prehistoric baseline reveals substantial decline of oyster reef condition in a Gulf of Mexico conservation priority area.

Authors:  Stephen G Hesterberg; Gregory S Herbert; Thomas J Pluckhahn; Ryan M Harke; Nasser M Al-Qattan; C Trevor Duke; Evan W Moore; Megan E Smith; Alexander C Delgado; Christina P Sampson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Insights from the past: unique opportunity or foreign country?

Authors:  Samuel T Turvey; Erin E Saupe
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Addressing priority questions of conservation science with palaeontological data.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kiessling; Nussaïbah B Raja; Vanessa Julie Roden; Samuel T Turvey; Erin E Saupe
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Archaeological data provide alternative hypotheses on Pacific herring (Clupea pallasii) distribution, abundance, and variability.

Authors:  Iain McKechnie; Dana Lepofsky; Madonna L Moss; Virginia L Butler; Trevor J Orchard; Gary Coupland; Fredrick Foster; Megan Caldwell; Ken Lertzman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A conservation palaeobiological perspective on Chesapeake Bay oysters.

Authors:  Rowan Lockwood; Roger Mann
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Unshifting the baseline: a framework for documenting historical population changes and assessing long-term anthropogenic impacts.

Authors:  Ana S L Rodrigues; Sophie Monsarrat; Anne Charpentier; Thomas M Brooks; Michael Hoffmann; Randall Reeves; Maria L D Palomares; Samuel T Turvey
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Millennial-scale sustainability of the Chesapeake Bay Native American oyster fishery.

Authors:  Torben C Rick; Leslie A Reeder-Myers; Courtney A Hofman; Denise Breitburg; Rowan Lockwood; Gregory Henkes; Lisa Kellogg; Darrin Lowery; Mark W Luckenbach; Roger Mann; Matthew B Ogburn; Melissa Southworth; John Wah; James Wesson; Anson H Hines
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Historic and bioarchaeological evidence supports late onset of post-Columbian epidemics in Native California.

Authors:  Terry L Jones; Al W Schwitalla; Marin A Pilloud; John R Johnson; Richard R Paine; Brian F Codding
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.