| Literature DB >> 22977698 |
Saurabh Singh1, Vinay Kumaraswamy, Nitin Sharma, Shyam Kumar Saraf, Ghanshyam Narayan Khare.
Abstract
STUDYEntities:
Keywords: Instrumentation; Kyphosis; Paraplegia; Tuberculosis
Year: 2012 PMID: 22977698 PMCID: PMC3429609 DOI: 10.4184/asj.2012.6.3.183
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian Spine J ISSN: 1976-1902
Fig. 1Showing method of measurement of local kyphosis. Local kyphosis was measured as the angle between the upper and lower end plates of the collapsed vertebrae preoperatively, postoperatively and at the last follow-up visit.
Fig. 2Schematic drawings show the percentage of spinal canal compromise. (A) Unaffected spinal canal above. (B) Unaffected spinal canal below. (C) The most affected level of the spinal canal. Formula for calculating canal compromise-{[(A+C)/2]-B/(A+C)} ×100 [1]).
Fig. 3Preoperative radiograph, preoperative magnetic resonance imaging picture and postoperative radiograph of a patient with tuberculosis of D12 vertebra for which anterior debridement, fibular strut grafting and instrumentation has been done.
Fig. 4Preoperative radiograph, preoperative magnetic resonance imaging picture and postoperative radiograph of a patient with tuberculosis of lower dorsal vertebra for which anterior debridement, fibular strut grafting has been done without instrumentation.
Table showing all cases in the study, their neurology before and after surgery and pre- and postoperative canal stenosis
a)This was a 68-year-old female patient in the instrumented group (group 1). She had other associated comorbidities along with tuberculosis. The patient was a case of known coronary artery disease with poor cardiac and pulmonary reserve along with chronic hypertension. The patient died of acute myocardial infarction on the 2nd postoperative day.
Table showing all cases in the study, their angle of local kyphosis pre- and postsurgery and at 3 years follow-up
a)This was a 68-year-old female patient in the instrumented group (group 1). She had other associated comorbidities along with tuberculosis. The patient was a case of known coronary artery disease with poor cardiac and pulmonary reserve along with chronic hypertension. The patient died of acute myocardial infarction on the 2nd postoperative day.
Comparing the results of group 1 (instrumented patients) and group 2 (no implant was used)