Literature DB >> 22977590

Single-incision laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy: Operative outcomes and its learning curve.

Takahiro Koyanagi1, Satoru Motomura.   

Abstract

We previously reported on single-incision laparoscopic surgery applied to laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) cases. We accumulated single-incision LAVH cases to evaluate this operation, including its learning curve. Since July 2009, we planned to perform single-incision LAVH in 50 cases. Operative time, estimated blood loss, weight of resected uterus and additional procedures were recorded and compared to those of conventional multiport, multi-incision LAVH. Additionally, 47 completed single-incision LAVH cases were divided into two groups; the former 24 cases and the latter 23 cases, to estimate its learning curve. Operative outcomes were statistically similar, except that more additional procedures were performed in the conventional LAVH group (27.7% in single-incision vs. 57.5% in the conventional group, P<0.01). We experienced three conversions to multiport surgery from single-incision LAVH, and no conversion case to 'open' total abdominal hysterectomy from conventional LAVH, which was not significantly different (3/50, 6% vs. 0/40, 0%, P=0.12). During the study period, operative time was significantly shortened from 73.0±17.6 min for the former 24 cases to 58.0±12.2 min for the latter 23 cases (P<0.01). There was no significant difference with respect to other operative outcomes between the two groups. Single-incision LAVH can be performed as effectively as conventional multiport LAVH with a short learning curve. We consider that single-incision LAVH may be a promising alternative method for the treatment of certain patients with uterine myomas and adenomyosis as even a less invasive gynecological operation is required without visible scars.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22977590      PMCID: PMC3440686          DOI: 10.3892/etm.2011.282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.447


  10 in total

1.  Outcomes and complications of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Kok-Min Seow; Chung-Tsung Tsou; Yu-Hung Lin; Jiann-Loung Hwang; Yieh-Loong Tsai; Lee-Wen Huang
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  Embryonic natural orifice transumbilical endoscopic surgery (E-NOTES) for adnexal tumors.

Authors:  Myong Cheol Lim; Tae-Joong Kim; Sokbom Kang; Duk-Soo Bae; Sang-Yoon Park; Sang-Soo Seo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Surgical complications of diagnostic and operative gynaecological laparoscopy: a series of 29,966 cases.

Authors:  C Chapron; D Querleu; M A Bruhat; P Madelenat; H Fernandez; F Pierre; J B Dubuisson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Single-port-access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes.

Authors:  Tae-Joong Kim; Yoo-Young Lee; Hyun Hwa Cha; Chul-Jung Kim; Chel Hun Choi; Jeong-Won Lee; Duk-Soo Bae; Je-Ho Lee; Byoung-Gie Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G Navarra; E Pozza; S Occhionorelli; P Carcoforo; I Donini
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Outpatient laparoscope sterilization under local anesthesia.

Authors:  C R Wheeless
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic surgery: application to laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Takahiro Koyanagi; Satoru Motomura
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 2.344

8.  A prospective randomized comparison of vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, and total laparoscopic hysterectomy in women with benign uterine disease.

Authors:  Jan Drahonovsky; Lucia Haakova; Michal Otcenasek; Ladislav Krofta; Eduard Kucera; Jaroslav Feyereisl
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 2.435

9.  Comparative study of vaginal, laparoscopically assisted vaginal and abdominal hysterectomies for uterine myoma larger than 6 cm in diameter or uterus weighing at least 450 g: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Jiann-Loung Hwang; Kok-Min Seow; Yieh-Loong Tsai; Lee-Wen Huang; Bih-Chwen Hsieh; Cagge Lee
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.636

10.  Single-port access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a novel method with a wound retractor and a glove.

Authors:  Yoo-Young Lee; Tae-Joong Kim; Chul Jung Kim; Heeseok Kang; Chel Hun Choi; Jeong-Won Lee; Byoung-Gie Kim; Je-Ho Lee; Duk-Soo Bae
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2009-05-31       Impact factor: 4.137

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for benign or pre-invasive uterine disease.

Authors:  Jeong-Yeol Park; Juhee Nho; In-Ji Cho; Yuran Park; Dae-Yeon Kim; Dae-Shik Suh; Jong-Hyeok Kim; Joo-Hyun Nam
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus conventional laparoscopy for hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Evelien M Sandberg; Claire F la Chapelle; Marjolein M van den Tweel; Jan W Schoones; Frank Willem Jansen
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.344

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.