PURPOSE: To evaluate associations between neuroretinal function measured with multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) and disease variables in adolescents with type 1 diabetes and no retinopathy. METHODS: Fundus photographs, blood glucose (BG) concentration, HbA1c, and monocular mfERG were performed on 115 adolescent patients (mean age ± SD; 15.7 ± 1.8 years) and 30 controls (18.0 ± 2.8 years). All subjects had best-corrected visual acuity ≥ 20/20. The 45° mfERG stimulus included 103 hexagons, reversing between dark and bright according to a pseudorandom m-sequence. Amplitudes (AMPs) and implicit times (ITs) were derived from local mfERG response waveforms, and Z-scores were calculated. Retinal maps of abnormality frequencies were generated. Differences between controls and patients were evaluated using t-tests. Associations between mfERG and age, duration, and diabetes control were examined using linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Mean mfERG IT was significantly longer in the patients compared with that in the controls (P = 0.019), but AMP was not different (P > 0.05). In all, 26 eyes (23%) of the patients had abnormal IT and 3 eyes (3%) had abnormal AMP. IT abnormalities were essentially distributed randomly across the retina. There were too few AMP abnormalities to examine their retinal distribution. IT was positively correlated with HbA1c (P < 0.0002) but not correlated with diabetes duration, BG, or age. CONCLUSIONS: Higher long-term blood glucose concentration is associated with degraded neuroretinal function in adolescents with type 1 diabetes and no retinopathy. Over 20% of these patients have abnormal neuroretinal function. It will be important to determine longitudinally whether the relationship between mfERG IT and diabetes control exists within individual adolescent patients.
PURPOSE: To evaluate associations between neuroretinal function measured with multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) and disease variables in adolescents with type 1 diabetes and no retinopathy. METHODS: Fundus photographs, blood glucose (BG) concentration, HbA1c, and monocular mfERG were performed on 115 adolescent patients (mean age ± SD; 15.7 ± 1.8 years) and 30 controls (18.0 ± 2.8 years). All subjects had best-corrected visual acuity ≥ 20/20. The 45° mfERG stimulus included 103 hexagons, reversing between dark and bright according to a pseudorandom m-sequence. Amplitudes (AMPs) and implicit times (ITs) were derived from local mfERG response waveforms, and Z-scores were calculated. Retinal maps of abnormality frequencies were generated. Differences between controls and patients were evaluated using t-tests. Associations between mfERG and age, duration, and diabetes control were examined using linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Mean mfERG IT was significantly longer in the patients compared with that in the controls (P = 0.019), but AMP was not different (P > 0.05). In all, 26 eyes (23%) of the patients had abnormal IT and 3 eyes (3%) had abnormal AMP. IT abnormalities were essentially distributed randomly across the retina. There were too few AMP abnormalities to examine their retinal distribution. IT was positively correlated with HbA1c (P < 0.0002) but not correlated with diabetes duration, BG, or age. CONCLUSIONS: Higher long-term blood glucose concentration is associated with degraded neuroretinal function in adolescents with type 1 diabetes and no retinopathy. Over 20% of these patients have abnormal neuroretinal function. It will be important to determine longitudinally whether the relationship between mfERG IT and diabetes control exists within individual adolescent patients.
Authors: Wendy W Harrison; Marcus A Bearse; Jason S Ng; Nicholas P Jewell; Shirin Barez; Dennis Burger; Marilyn E Schneck; Anthony J Adams Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-02-09 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Edmund Q Sanchez; Larry B Melton; Srinath Chinnakotla; Marlon F Levy; Bernard V Fischbach; Robert Goldstein; Göran B Klintmalm Journal: Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) Date: 2010-01
Authors: Dana Dabelea; Ronny A Bell; Ralph B D'Agostino; Giuseppina Imperatore; Judith M Johansen; Barbara Linder; Lenna L Liu; Beth Loots; Santica Marcovina; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; David J Pettitt; Beth Waitzfelder Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-06-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ivy S Samuels; Jose-Andres C Portillo; Yanling Miao; Timothy S Kern; Carlos S Subauste Journal: Vis Neurosci Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 3.241
Authors: M Parravano; L Ziccardi; E Borrelli; E Costanzo; S Frontoni; F Picconi; V Parisi; R Sacconi; A Di Renzo; M Varano; G Querques Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-07-26 Impact factor: 4.379