Literature DB >> 22976397

The relative contributions of radial and laminar optic flow to the perception of linear self-motion.

Laurence R Harris1, Rainer Herpers, Michael Jenkin, Robert S Allison, Heather Jenkin, Bill Kapralos, David Scherfgen, Sandra Felsner.   

Abstract

When illusory self-motion is induced in a stationary observer by optic flow, the perceived distance traveled is generally overestimated relative to the distance of a remembered target (Redlick, Harris, & Jenkin, 2001): subjects feel they have gone further than the simulated distance and indicate that they have arrived at a target's previously seen location too early. In this article we assess how the radial and laminar components of translational optic flow contribute to the perceived distance traveled. Subjects monocularly viewed a target presented in a virtual hallway wallpapered with stripes that periodically changed color to prevent tracking. The target was then extinguished and the visible area of the hallway shrunk to an oval region 40° (h) × 24° (v). Subjects either continued to look centrally or shifted their gaze eccentrically, thus varying the relative amounts of radial and laminar flow visible. They were then presented with visual motion compatible with moving down the hallway toward the target and pressed a button when they perceived that they had reached the target's remembered position. Data were modeled by the output of a leaky spatial integrator (Lappe, Jenkin, & Harris, 2007). The sensory gain varied systematically with viewing eccentricity while the leak constant was independent of viewing eccentricity. Results were modeled as the linear sum of separate mechanisms sensitive to radial and laminar optic flow. Results are compatible with independent channels for processing the radial and laminar flow components of optic flow that add linearly to produce large but predictable errors in perceived distance traveled.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22976397     DOI: 10.1167/12.10.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  7 in total

1.  Contributions of visual and proprioceptive information to travelled distance estimation during changing sensory congruencies.

Authors:  Jennifer L Campos; John S Butler; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Going the distance and beyond: simulated low vision increases perception of distance traveled during locomotion.

Authors:  Kristina M Rand; Erica M Barhorst-Cates; Eren Kiris; William B Thompson; Sarah H Creem-Regehr
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-04-21

3.  Decomposing fear perception: A combination of psychophysics and neurometric modeling of fear perception.

Authors:  Emily C Forscher; Yan Zheng; Zijun Ke; Jonathan Folstein; Wen Li
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  When gravity is not where it should be: How perceived orientation affects visual self-motion processing.

Authors:  Meaghan McManus; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Perception of Egocentric Distance during Gravitational Changes in Parabolic Flight.

Authors:  Gilles Clément; Nuno Loureiro; Duarte Sousa; Andre Zandvliet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Viewpoint oscillation improves the perception of distance travelled in static observers but not during treadmill walking.

Authors:  Martin Bossard; Cédric Goulon; Daniel Mestre
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Perceiving jittering self-motion in a field of lollipops from ages 4 to 95.

Authors:  Nils-Alexander Bury; Michael R Jenkin; Robert S Allison; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.