BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Among cognitively healthy older individuals, the relationship among the 2 hallmark proteins of AD (Aβ and τ APOE ε4) and neurodegeneration is not well-understood. Here, we investigated the relationship between Aβ, p-τ, and APOE ε4 on longitudinal brain atrophy in preclinical AD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 107 cognitively healthy older adults who underwent longitudinal MR imaging and baseline lumbar puncture. Within the same linear mixed-effects model, we concurrently investigated main and interactive effects between the APOE ε4 genotype and CSF Aβ(1-42), CSF p-τ and CSF Aβ(1-42), and the APOE ε4 genotype and CSF p-τ on entorhinal cortex atrophy rate. We also examined the relationship of APOE ε4, CSF p-τ, and CSF Aβ(1-42) on the atrophy rate of other AD-vulnerable neuroanatomic regions. RESULTS: The full model with main and interactive effects demonstrated a significant interaction only between CSF p-τ and CSF Aβ(1-42) on entorhinal cortex atrophy rate, indicating elevated atrophy with time in individuals with increased CSF p-τ and decreased CSF Aβ(1-42). The APOE ε4 genotype was significantly and specifically associated with CSF Aβ(1-42). However, the interaction between the APOE ε4 genotype and either CSF Aβ(1-42) or CSF p-τ on entorhinal cortex atrophy rate was not significant. We found similar results in other AD-vulnerable regions. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of our findings and building on prior experimental evidence, we propose a model of the pathogenic cascade underlying preclinical AD in which APOE ε4 primarily influences the pathology of Alzheimer disease via Aβ-related mechanisms, and in turn, Aβ-associated neurodegeneration occurs only in the presence of p-τ.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Among cognitively healthy older individuals, the relationship among the 2 hallmark proteins of AD (Aβ and τ APOE ε4) and neurodegeneration is not well-understood. Here, we investigated the relationship between Aβ, p-τ, and APOE ε4 on longitudinal brain atrophy in preclinical AD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 107 cognitively healthy older adults who underwent longitudinal MR imaging and baseline lumbar puncture. Within the same linear mixed-effects model, we concurrently investigated main and interactive effects between the APOE ε4 genotype and CSF Aβ(1-42), CSF p-τ and CSF Aβ(1-42), and the APOE ε4 genotype and CSF p-τ on entorhinal cortex atrophy rate. We also examined the relationship of APOE ε4, CSF p-τ, and CSF Aβ(1-42) on the atrophy rate of other AD-vulnerable neuroanatomic regions. RESULTS: The full model with main and interactive effects demonstrated a significant interaction only between CSF p-τ and CSF Aβ(1-42) on entorhinal cortex atrophy rate, indicating elevated atrophy with time in individuals with increased CSF p-τ and decreased CSF Aβ(1-42). The APOE ε4 genotype was significantly and specifically associated with CSF Aβ(1-42). However, the interaction between the APOE ε4 genotype and either CSF Aβ(1-42) or CSF p-τ on entorhinal cortex atrophy rate was not significant. We found similar results in other AD-vulnerable regions. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of our findings and building on prior experimental evidence, we propose a model of the pathogenic cascade underlying preclinical AD in which APOE ε4 primarily influences the pathology of Alzheimer disease via Aβ-related mechanisms, and in turn, Aβ-associated neurodegeneration occurs only in the presence of p-τ.
Authors: Reisa A Sperling; Paul S Aisen; Laurel A Beckett; David A Bennett; Suzanne Craft; Anne M Fagan; Takeshi Iwatsubo; Clifford R Jack; Jeffrey Kaye; Thomas J Montine; Denise C Park; Eric M Reiman; Christopher C Rowe; Eric Siemers; Yaakov Stern; Kristine Yaffe; Maria C Carrillo; Bill Thies; Marcelle Morrison-Bogorad; Molly V Wagster; Creighton H Phelps Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2011-04-21 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: John C Morris; Catherine M Roe; Chengjie Xiong; Anne M Fagan; Alison M Goate; David M Holtzman; Mark A Mintun Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Lars M Ittner; Yazi D Ke; Fabien Delerue; Mian Bi; Amadeus Gladbach; Janet van Eersel; Heidrun Wölfing; Billy C Chieng; MacDonald J Christie; Ian A Napier; Anne Eckert; Matthias Staufenbiel; Edna Hardeman; Jürgen Götz Journal: Cell Date: 2010-07-22 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Jungsu Kim; Joseph M Castellano; Hong Jiang; Jacob M Basak; Maia Parsadanian; Vi Pham; Stephanie M Mason; Steven M Paul; David M Holtzman Journal: Neuron Date: 2009-12-10 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Leslie M Shaw; Hugo Vanderstichele; Malgorzata Knapik-Czajka; Christopher M Clark; Paul S Aisen; Ronald C Petersen; Kaj Blennow; Holly Soares; Adam Simon; Piotr Lewczuk; Robert Dean; Eric Siemers; William Potter; Virginia M-Y Lee; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Stephanie Jb Vos; Chengjie Xiong; Pieter Jelle Visser; Mateusz S Jasielec; Jason Hassenstab; Elizabeth A Grant; Nigel J Cairns; John C Morris; David M Holtzman; Anne M Fagan Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2013-09-04 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Michael J Properzi; Rachel F Buckley; Jasmeer P Chhatwal; Michael C Donohue; Cristina Lois; Elizabeth C Mormino; Keith A Johnson; Reisa A Sperling; Aaron P Schultz Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2018-11-17 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Rahul S Desikan; Wesley K Thompson; Dominic Holland; Christopher P Hess; James B Brewer; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Ole A Andreassen; Linda K McEvoy; Bradley T Hyman; Anders M Dale Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: R S Desikan; A J Schork; Y Wang; A Witoelar; M Sharma; L K McEvoy; D Holland; J B Brewer; C-H Chen; W K Thompson; D Harold; J Williams; M J Owen; M C O'Donovan; M A Pericak-Vance; R Mayeux; J L Haines; L A Farrer; G D Schellenberg; P Heutink; A B Singleton; A Brice; N W Wood; J Hardy; M Martinez; S H Choi; A DeStefano; M A Ikram; J C Bis; A Smith; A L Fitzpatrick; L Launer; C van Duijn; S Seshadri; I D Ulstein; D Aarsland; T Fladby; S Djurovic; B T Hyman; J Snaedal; H Stefansson; K Stefansson; T Gasser; O A Andreassen; A M Dale Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2015-02-17 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Li Shen; Paul M Thompson; Steven G Potkin; Lars Bertram; Lindsay A Farrer; Tatiana M Foroud; Robert C Green; Xiaolan Hu; Matthew J Huentelman; Sungeun Kim; John S K Kauwe; Qingqin Li; Enchi Liu; Fabio Macciardi; Jason H Moore; Leanne Munsie; Kwangsik Nho; Vijay K Ramanan; Shannon L Risacher; David J Stone; Shanker Swaminathan; Arthur W Toga; Michael W Weiner; Andrew J Saykin Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 3.978
Authors: Daniel Ferreira; Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez; Eric Westman; Lars-Olof Wahlund; Antonio Sarría; Pedro Serrano-Aguilar Journal: Front Aging Neurosci Date: 2014-03-24 Impact factor: 5.750
Authors: Priscila Tavares Macêdo; Antônio C Q Aquino; Ywlliane S R Meurer; Luiz E M Brandão; Clarissa L C Campêlo; Ramon H Lima; Marcos R Costa; Alessandra M Ribeiro; Regina H Silva Journal: Front Aging Neurosci Date: 2018-01-30 Impact factor: 5.750
Authors: Rahul S Desikan; Wesley K Thompson; Dominic Holland; Christopher P Hess; James B Brewer; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Ole A Andreassen; Linda K McEvoy; Bradley T Hyman; Anders M Dale Journal: Mol Neurodegener Date: 2013-10-02 Impact factor: 14.195