Literature DB >> 22975158

A control point interpolation method for the non-parametric quantification of cerebral haemodynamics from dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.

Amit Mehndiratta1, Bradley J MacIntosh, David E Crane, Stephen J Payne, Michael A Chappell.   

Abstract

DSC-MRI analysis is based on tracer kinetic theory and typically involves the deconvolution of the MRI signal in tissue with an arterial input function (AIF), which is an ill-posed inverse problem. The current standard singular value decomposition (SVD) method typically underestimates perfusion and introduces non-physiological oscillations in the resulting residue function. An alternative vascular model (VM) based approach permits only a restricted family of shapes for the residue function, which might not be appropriate in pathologies like stroke. In this work a novel deconvolution algorithm is presented that can estimate both perfusion and residue function shape accurately without requiring the latter to belong to a specific class of functional shapes. A control point interpolation (CPI) method is proposed that represents the residue function by a number of control points (CPs), each having two degrees of freedom (in amplitude and time). A complete residue function shape is then generated from the CPs using a cubic spline interpolation. The CPI method is shown in simulation to be able to estimate cerebral blood flow (CBF) with greater accuracy giving a regression coefficient between true and estimated CBF of 0.96 compared to 0.83 for VM and 0.71 for the circular SVD (oSVD) method. The CPI method was able to accurately estimate the residue function over a wide range of simulated conditions. The CPI method has also been demonstrated on clinical data where a marked difference was observed between the residue function of normally appearing brain parenchyma and infarcted tissue. The CPI method could serve as a viable means to examine the residue function shape under pathological variations.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22975158     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  7 in total

1.  Reliability of CT perfusion-derived CBF in relation to hemodynamic compromise in patients with cerebrovascular steno-occlusive disease: a comparative study with 15O PET.

Authors:  Masanobu Ibaraki; Tomomi Ohmura; Keisuke Matsubara; Toshibumi Kinoshita
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 6.200

2.  Reliable estimation of capillary transit time distributions using DSC-MRI.

Authors:  Kim Mouridsen; Mikkel Bo Hansen; Leif Østergaard; Sune Nørhøj Jespersen
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 6.200

3.  A generalized mathematical framework for estimating the residue function for arbitrary vascular networks.

Authors:  Chang Sub Park; Stephen J Payne
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Automatic determination of the arterial input function in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: comparison of different reproducible clustering algorithms.

Authors:  Jiandong Yin; Jiawen Yang; Qiyong Guo
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Technical Pitfalls of Signal Truncation in Perfusion MRI of Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Kelvin K Wong; Steve H Fung; Pamela Z New; Stephen T C Wong
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Non-parametric deconvolution using Bézier curves for quantification of cerebral perfusion in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.

Authors:  Arthur Chakwizira; André Ahlgren; Linda Knutsson; Ronnie Wirestam
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.533

7.  Evaluating the feasibility of an agglomerative hierarchy clustering algorithm for the automatic detection of the arterial input function using DSC-MRI.

Authors:  Jiandong Yin; Jiawen Yang; Qiyong Guo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.