Literature DB >> 22974716

Fractional urinary fluoride excretion of 6-7-year-old children attending schools in low-fluoride and naturally fluoridated areas in the UK.

F V Zohoori1, R Walls, L Teasdale, D Landes, I N Steen, P Moynihan, N Omid, A Maguire.   

Abstract

F is an important trace element for bones and teeth. The protective effect of F against dental caries is well established. Urine is the prime vehicle for the excretion of F from the body; however, the relationship between F intake and excretion is complex: the derived fractional urinary F excretion (FUFE) aids understanding of this in different age groups. The present study aimed to investigate the relationships between (1) total daily F intake (TDFI) and daily urinary F excretion (DUFE), and (2) TDFI and FUFE in 6-7-year-olds, recruited in low-F and naturally fluoridated (natural-F) areas in north-east England. TDFI from diet and toothbrushing and DUFE were assessed through F analysis of duplicate dietary plate, toothbrushing expectorate and urine samples using a F-ion-selective electrode. FUFE was calculated as the ratio between DUFE and TDFI. Pearson's correlation and regression analysis were used to investigate the relationship between TDFI and FUFE. A group of thirty-three children completed the study; twenty-one receiving low-F water (0·30 mg F/l) and twelve receiving natural-F water (1·06 mg F/l) at school. The mean TDFI was 0·076 (SD 0·038) and 0·038 (SD 0·027) mg/kg per d for the natural-F and low-F groups, respectively. The mean DUFE was 0·017 (SD 0·007) and 0·012 (SD 0·006) mg/kg per d for the natural-F and low-F groups, respectively. FUFE was lower in the natural-F group (30 %) compared with the low-F group (40 %). Pearson's correlation coefficient for (1) TDFI and DUFE was +0·22 (P= 0·22) and for (2) TDFI and FUFE was − 0·63 (P< 0·001). In conclusion, there was no correlation between TDFI and DUFE. However, there was a statistically significant negative correlation between FUFE and TDFI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22974716     DOI: 10.1017/S0007114512003583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  4 in total

1.  Use of public water supply fluoride concentration as an indicator of population exposure to fluoride in England 1995-2015.

Authors:  David J Roberts; J Morris; A Wood; N Q Verlander; G S Leonardi; T Fletcher
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  A Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling Approach Using Biomonitoring Data in Order to Assess the Contribution of Drinking Water for the Achievement of an Optimal Fluoride Dose for Dental Health in Children.

Authors:  Keven J Jean; Nancy Wassef; Fabien Gagnon; Mathieu Valcke
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Fluoride Intake Through Dental Care Products: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hanan Saad; Raphaëlle Escoube; Sylvie Babajko; Sophia Houari
Journal:  Front Oral Health       Date:  2022-06-10

4.  The use of urinary fluoride excretion to facilitate monitoring fluoride intake: A systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Oladipo S Idowu; Liane B Azevedo; Ruth A Valentine; Josie Swan; Priyanka V Vasantavada; Anne Maguire; Fatemeh V Zohoori
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.