Literature DB >> 22974496

Good test-retest reproducibility for an instrument to capture self-reported melanoma risk factors.

Conrad J Morze1, Catherine M Olsen, Susan L Perry, Lea M Jackman, Barbara A Ranieri, Suzanne M O'Brien, Rebekah A Cicero, David C Whiteman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the test-retest reliability and validity of self-reported items capturing phenotypic characteristics and sun exposure measures in the baseline survey instrument used for a prospective study of skin cancer and melanoma. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: Repeatability/validity study conducted among 114 participants randomly selected from the cohort to complete the survey instrument a second time and to undergo a physician skin examination. We calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and kappa (κ) statistics as measures of agreement for continuous and categorical measures, respectively.
RESULTS: Measures of phenotypic characteristics showed moderate-to-high agreement (e.g., eye color, κ=0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.80, 0.94). Measures of sun exposure had slightly lower estimates of agreement. The repeatability of items relating to medical and family history of skin cancer was high (e.g., the number of skin cancers removed surgically, κ(w)=0.79; 95% CI: 0.71, 0.88). Physician counts of nevi correlated well with categorical measures of self-reported nevus density at the age of 21 years but correlated only modestly with absolute nevus counts conducted by participants (ICC, 0.38; 95% CI: 0.19, 0.54).
CONCLUSION: Our survey instrument demonstrated fair-to-good test-retest reliability for most self-reported risk factors for melanoma, indicating the suitability of these items for developing risk prediction tools in the future.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22974496     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  10 in total

Review 1.  Predicting melanoma risk: theory, practice and future challenges.

Authors:  David Whiteman
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2014-12-04

2.  MelaNostrum: a consensus questionnaire of standardized epidemiologic and clinical variables for melanoma risk assessment by the melanostrum consortium.

Authors:  Alexander J Stratigos; Maria Concetta Fargnoli; Arcangela De Nicolo; Ketty Peris; Susana Puig; Efthymia Soura; Chiara Menin; Donato Calista; Paola Ghiorzo; Mario Mandala; Daniela Massi; Monica Rodolfo; Laura Del Regno; Irene Stefanaki; Helen Gogas; Veronique Bataille; Margaret A Tucker; David Whiteman; Eduardo Nagore; Maria Teresa Landi
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 6.166

3.  Accuracy of self-reported nevus and pigmentation phenotype compared with clinical assessment in a population-based study of young Australian adults.

Authors:  Anne E Cust; Kristen M Pickles; Chris Goumas; Thao Vu; Helen Schmid; Eduardo Nagore; John Kelly; Joanne F Aitken; Graham G Giles; John L Hopper; Mark A Jenkins; Graham J Mann
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Assessment of Incidence Rate and Risk Factors for Keratoacanthoma Among Residents of Queensland, Australia.

Authors:  Magdalena Claeson; Nirmala Pandeya; Jean-Claude Dusingize; Bridie S Thompson; Adele C Green; Rachel E Neale; Catherine M Olsen; David C Whiteman
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 10.282

5.  Level of UV Exposure, Skin Type, and Age Are More Important than Thiopurine Use for Keratinocyte Carcinoma Development in IBD Patients.

Authors:  Yang Wu; Simon Ghaly; Stephen Kerr; Bryce Jackson; Katherine Hanigan; Deborah Martins; Krupa Krishnaprasad; Reme E Mountifield; David C Whiteman; Peter A Bampton; Richard B Gearry; Graham L Radford-Smith; Ian C Lawrance
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Host Characteristics and Risk of Incident Melanoma by Breslow Thickness.

Authors:  Wen-Qing Li; Eunyoung Cho; Shaowei Wu; Suyun Li; Natalie H Matthews; Abrar A Qureshi
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Patient and Tumour Characteristics of Keratoacanthoma in a Large, Community-based Cohort Study from Queensland, Australia.

Authors:  Agnes Kolmodin; Nirmala P Pandeya; Catherine M Olsen; Jean Claude Dusingize; David C Whiteman; Magdalena Claeson
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.875

8.  A reconstruction of a medical history from administrative data: with an application to the cost of skin cancer.

Authors:  David Rowell; Louisa G Gordon; Catherine M Olsen; David C Whiteman
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2015-02-11

9.  A comparison of the direct medical costs for individuals with or without basal or squamous cell skin cancer: A study from Australia.

Authors:  David Rowell; Louisa G Gordon; Catherine M Olsen; David C Whiteman
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2016-05-11

10.  Test-retest reliability of a computer-assisted self-administered questionnaire on early life exposure in a nasopharyngeal carcinoma case-control study.

Authors:  Zhi-Ming Mai; Jia-Huang Lin; Shing-Chun Chiang; Roger Kai-Cheong Ngan; Dora Lai-Wan Kwong; Wai-Tong Ng; Alice Wan-Ying Ng; Kam-Tong Yuen; Kai-Ming Ip; Yap-Hang Chan; Anne Wing-Mui Lee; Sai-Yin Ho; Maria Li Lung; Tai-Hing Lam
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.