BACKGROUND: BM4 is a novel genetically engineered variant of the major birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 that lacks the typical Bet v 1-like fold and displays negligible IgE-binding but strong T cell-activating capacity. The aim of this study was to elucidate possible differences between BM4 and Bet v 1 in internalization, antigen processing, and presentation. METHODS: Proliferative responses to BM4 and Bet v 1 of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and Bet v 1-specific T-cell clones were compared. Fluorescently labeled BM4 and Bet v 1 were used to study surface binding, endocytosis, and intracellular degradation by monocyte-derived DC (mdDC). Both proteins were digested by endolysosomal extracts of mdDC. BM4- and Bet v 1-pulsed mdDC were employed to assess the kinetics of activation of Bet v 1-specific T-cell clones and the polarization of naïve T cells. RESULTS: BM4 displayed a significantly stronger T cell-activating capacity than Bet v 1. Furthermore, BM4 showed increased surface binding and internalization as well as faster endolysosomal degradation compared with Bet v 1. BM4-pulsed mdDC induced enhanced proliferative responses at earlier time-points in Bet v 1-specific T-cell clones and promoted less IL-5 production in T cells than Bet v 1-pulsed mdDC. CONCLUSION: The loss of the Bet v 1-fold changes the protein's interaction with the human immune system at the level of antigen-presenting cells resulting in altered T-cell responses. By combining low IgE-binding with strong and modulating T cell-activating capacity, BM4 represents a highly interesting candidate for specific immunotherapy of birch pollen allergy.
BACKGROUND:BM4 is a novel genetically engineered variant of the major birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 that lacks the typical Bet v 1-like fold and displays negligible IgE-binding but strong T cell-activating capacity. The aim of this study was to elucidate possible differences between BM4 and Bet v 1 in internalization, antigen processing, and presentation. METHODS: Proliferative responses to BM4 and Bet v 1 of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and Bet v 1-specific T-cell clones were compared. Fluorescently labeled BM4 and Bet v 1 were used to study surface binding, endocytosis, and intracellular degradation by monocyte-derived DC (mdDC). Both proteins were digested by endolysosomal extracts of mdDC. BM4- and Bet v 1-pulsed mdDC were employed to assess the kinetics of activation of Bet v 1-specific T-cell clones and the polarization of naïve T cells. RESULTS:BM4 displayed a significantly stronger T cell-activating capacity than Bet v 1. Furthermore, BM4 showed increased surface binding and internalization as well as faster endolysosomal degradation compared with Bet v 1. BM4-pulsed mdDC induced enhanced proliferative responses at earlier time-points in Bet v 1-specific T-cell clones and promoted less IL-5 production in T cells than Bet v 1-pulsed mdDC. CONCLUSION: The loss of the Bet v 1-fold changes the protein's interaction with the human immune system at the level of antigen-presenting cells resulting in altered T-cell responses. By combining low IgE-binding with strong and modulating T cell-activating capacity, BM4 represents a highly interesting candidate for specific immunotherapy of birch pollen allergy.
Authors: Svetlana V Guryanova; Ekaterina I Finkina; Daria N Melnikova; Ivan V Bogdanov; Barbara Bohle; Tatiana V Ovchinnikova Journal: Front Mol Biosci Date: 2022-06-16
Authors: Thomas J M Michiels; Madelief A van Veen; Hugo D Meiring; Wim Jiskoot; Gideon F A Kersten; Bernard Metz Journal: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 3.109
Authors: Felix Husslik; Kay-Martin Hanschmann; Ariane Krämer; Christian Seutter von Loetzen; Kristian Schweimer; Iris Bellinghausen; Regina Treudler; Jan C Simon; Lothar Vogel; Elke Völker; Stefanie Randow; Andreas Reuter; Paul Rösch; Stefan Vieths; Thomas Holzhauser; Dirk Schiller Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ulrike Pichler; Claudia Asam; Richard Weiss; Almedina Isakovic; Michael Hauser; Peter Briza; Fatima Ferreira; Michael Wallner Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2013-09-23 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: A Roulias; U Pichler; M Hauser; M Himly; H Hofer; P Lackner; C Ebner; P Briza; B Bohle; M Egger; M Wallner; F Ferreira Journal: Allergy Date: 2013-11-14 Impact factor: 13.146