| Literature DB >> 22973539 |
Ruxandra I Molnar1, Hanh Witte, Iris Dinkelacker, Laure Villate, Ralf J Sommer.
Abstract
Modern evolutionary biology requires integrative approaches that combine life history, population structure, ecology, and development. The nematode Pristionchus pacificus has been established as a model system in which these aspects can be studied in one organism. P. pacificus has well-developed genetic, genomic, and transgenic tools and its ecologic association with scarab beetles is well described. A recent study provided first mutation rate estimates based on mitochondrial genome sequencing and mutation accumulation line experiments that help resolve rather ancient evolutionary branches. Here, we analyzed the tandem-repeat pattern and studied spontaneous mutation rates for microsatellite markers by using the previously generated mutation accumulation lines. We found that 0.59%-3.83% of the genome is composed of short tandem repeats. We developed 41 microsatellite markers, randomly chosen throughout the genome and analyzed them in 82 mutation accumulation lines after 142 generations. A total of 31 mutations were identified in these lines. There was a strong correlation between allele size and mutation rate in P. pacificus, similar to Caenorhabditis elegans. In contrast to C. elegans, however, there is no evidence for a bias toward multistep mutations. The mutation spectrum of microsatellite loci in P. pacificus shows more insertions than deletions, indicating a tendency toward lengthening, a process that might have contributed to the increase in genome size. The mutation rates obtained for individual microsatellite markers provide guidelines for divergence time estimates that can be applied in P. pacificus next-generation sequencing approaches of wild isolates.Entities:
Keywords: Caenorhabditis elegans; Pristionchus pacificus; microsatellite markers; mutation accumulation lines; tandem repeats
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22973539 PMCID: PMC3429916 DOI: 10.1534/g3.112.003129
Source DB: PubMed Journal: G3 (Bethesda) ISSN: 2160-1836 Impact factor: 3.154
Observed repeat loci in the P. pacificus genome
| Perfect Repeats | Imperfect Repeats | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Repeat unit | TRF–Strict | TRF–Loose | TRF–Strict | TRF–Loose |
| Total | 730 | Not all sites are mentioned | ||
| Dinucleotides | ||||
| AC | 21 | 1599 | 29 | 434 |
| AG | 265 | 10,785 | 1636 | 7510 |
| AT | 97 | 1541 | 316 | 647 |
| CG | 0 | 549 | 7 | 54 |
| Total | 383 | 14,474 | 1988 | 8645 |
| Trinucleotides | ||||
| AAC | 32 | 4155 | 632 | 1869 |
| AAG | 3 | 9336 | 606 | 5762 |
| AAT | 57 | 6437 | 629 | 3236 |
| ACC | 2 | 1093 | 8 | 1159 |
| ACG | 2 | 1858 | 21 | 399 |
| ACT | 3 | 1072 | 20 | 241 |
| AGC | 3 | 2762 | 359 | 1382 |
| AGG | 3 | 7247 | 573 | 4161 |
| ATC | 28 | 4461 | 79 | 1088 |
| CCG | 0 | 718 | 23 | 193 |
| Total | 133 | 39,139 | 2,950 | 19,490 |
| Tetranucleotides | ||||
| AAAC | 0 | 444 | 23 | 416 |
| AAAG | 1 | 902 | 38 | 1381 |
| AAAT | 4 | 2250 | 175 | 2921 |
| AACC | 0 | 4 | 0 | 36 |
| AACG | 0 | 174 | 0 | 70 |
| AACT | 2 | 86 | 7 | 63 |
| AAGC | 0 | 127 | 0 | 54 |
| AAGG | 0 | 1000 | 63 | 1616 |
| AAGT | 0 | 73 | 9 | 97 |
| AATC | 8 | 1457 | 63 | 1213 |
| AATG | 29 | 1426 | 122 | 1130 |
| AATT | 3 | 1222 | 835 | 2822 |
| ACAG | 0 | 239 | 70 | 205 |
| ACAT | 1 | 175 | 11 | 117 |
| ACCC | 0 | 68 | 218 | 26 |
| ACCG | 0 | 51 | 1 | 85 |
| ACCT | 0 | 82 | 3 | 57 |
| ACGC | 0 | 48 | 0 | 41 |
| ACGG | 0 | 46 | 1 | 35 |
| ACGT | 0 | 7 | 0 | 2 |
| ACTC | 1 | 309 | 3 | 223 |
| ACTG | 0 | 125 | 3 | 71 |
| AGAT | 2 | 325 | 8 | 240 |
| AGCG | 0 | 240 | 1 | 263 |
| AGCT | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| AGGC | 0 | 52 | 1 | 27 |
| AGGG | 1 | 995 | 0 | 2681 |
| ATCC | 0 | 330 | 0 | 283 |
| ATCG | 0 | 476 | 3 | 208 |
| ATGC | 0 | 44 | 0 | 19 |
| CAGC | 1 | 30 | 0 | 14 |
| CCCG | 0 | 38 | 0 | 54 |
| CCGG | 0 | 12 | 0 | 330 |
| Total | 53 | 12,922 | 1837 | 17,219 |
| Pentanucleotides | ||||
| AAAAG | 2 | 80 | 16 | 878 |
| AAAAT | 1 | 312 | 86 | 1615 |
| AAAGG | 1 | 50 | 11 | 469 |
| AAAGT | 12 | 107 | 9 | 136 |
| AAATC | 4 | 101 | 11 | 236 |
| AAGAG | 1 | 316 | 201 | 2088 |
| AAGGG | 2 | 189 | 58 | 1100 |
| AATAC | 4 | 103 | 10 | 194 |
| AATTC | 55 | 334 | 48 | 453 |
| ACATC | 2 | 32 | 1 | 80 |
| ACTCT | 1 | 11 | 1 | 73 |
| AGAGG | 0 | 122 | 113 | 1274 |
| AGGGG | 0 | 139 | 167 | 1816 |
| Total | 85 | Not all sites are mentioned | ||
| Hexanucleotides | ||||
| AAAAAC | 1 | 56 | 66 | 338 |
| AAAAAG | 1 | 31 | 88 | 505 |
| AAAAAT | 0 | 46 | 70 | 790 |
| AAAAGT | 1 | 5 | 5 | 59 |
| AAAATC | 1 | 4 | 2 | 48 |
| AAAGGT | 2 | 158 | 5 | 226 |
| AAATTC | 11 | 18 | 5 | 59 |
| AAATTG | 20 | 47 | 11 | 95 |
| AACAAT | 2 | 36 | 203 | 457 |
| AAGAGG | 1 | 42 | 127 | 618 |
| AAGCCT | 8 | 43 | 68 | 101 |
| AAGTAT | 3 | 21 | 12 | 27 |
| AATAAG | 6 | 24 | 101 | 207 |
| AATATC | 0 | 32 | 2 | 33 |
| AATCTG | 1 | 3 | 1 | 17 |
| AATTAC | 6 | 27 | 9 | 55 |
| ACACGC | 1 | 1 | 2 | 12 |
| ACCAGG | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| ACTCGC | 1 | 1 | 210 | 892 |
| AGAGGG | 0 | 78 | 6 | 14 |
| AGCCGG | 1 | 2 | 0 | 9 |
| AGAGTC | 1 | 1 | 10 | 45 |
| ATCTGT | 2 | 50 | 7 | 45 |
| ATCGTC | 2 | 5 | 6 | 34 |
| ATCTTC | 1 | 14 | 83 | 212 |
| ATGATT | 2 | 4 | 9 | 57 |
| Total | 76 | Not all sites are mentioned | ||
Shown only if perfect loci were found.
Shown only if perfect loci were found with the TRF-strict method or more than 30 perfect loci were found with TRF-loose method.
Figure 1Composition per repeat type: (A) dinucleotide loci, (B) trinucleotide loci.
Allelic mutation rate estimates per generation
| Marker | Chr. | Repeat | Percent Match | No. Mutations | Magnitude of Mutation (No. Lines) | Mutation Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M21 | II | (GGGCAC)11 | 51 | 0 | ||
| M01 | I | (CT)55 | 55 | 0 | ||
| M15 | II | (TC)57 | 55 | 0 | ||
| M41 | V | (TCT)26 | 59 | 0 | ||
| M07 | I | (TTG)18 | 64 | 0 | ||
| M43 | V | (TTAA)15 | 69 | 0 | ||
| M29 | III | (TTAA)10 | 72 | 0 | ||
| M16 | II | (TGA)15 | 73 | 0 | ||
| M35 | IV | (CTCC)20 | 73 | 0 | ||
| M42 | V | (AATT)9 | 75 | 0 | ||
| M13 | I | (CTTAAC)6 | 78 | 0 | ||
| M08 | I | (TAAT)3 | 81 | 0 | ||
| M47 | X | (GT)7 | 84 | 0 | ||
| M06 | I | (AAC)16 | 85 | 0 | ||
| M34 | IV | (AT)17 | 85 | 1 | +1(1) | (9.2 × 10−5) |
| M26 | III | (TTA)29 | 85 | 0 | ||
| M04 | I | (CAA)11 | 87 | 0 | ||
| M22 | II | (GAATAA)5 | 88 | 0 | ||
| M45 | V | (GAGAG)3 | 91 | 0 | ||
| M11 | I | (TTCTT)3 | 92 | 0 | ||
| M33 | IV | (AG)17 | 93 | 0 | ||
| M14 | I | (GAATAA)4 | 95 | 0 | ||
| M28 | III | (TGG)3 | 100 | 0 | ||
| M18 | II | (TCT)3 | 100 | 0 | ||
| M17 | II | (GTT)3 | 100 | 1 | −1(1) | (8.9 × 10−5) |
| M19 | II | (TCGA)3 | 100 | 0 | ||
| M38 | IV | (AAGCCT)6 | 100 | 0 | ||
| M03 | I | (TC)7 | 100 | 0 | ||
| M05 | I | (AGT)8 | 100 | 0 | ||
| M02 | I | (GA)13 | 100 | 0 | ||
| M25 | III | (AG)14 | 100 | 0 | ||
| M46 | X | (AG)15 | 100 | 0 | ||
| M84 | III | (CTCTTC)17 | 100 | 1 | +1(1) | (8.9 × 10−5) |
| M74 | V | (CAA)33 | 100 | 2 | −1(1), +1(1) | 2.3 × 10−4 |
| M77 | X | (ACAT)35 | 100 | 1 | +1(1) | (9.6 × 10−5) |
| M78 | I/V | (ACAT)36 | 100 | 3 | +1(2), -9(1) | 2.8 × 10−4 |
| M79 | I | (TTAG)40 | 100 | 4 | +1(4) | 3.6 × 10−4 |
| M82 | X | (TGAAT)43 | 100 | 6 | −3(1), -1(1), +1(2), +2(1), +3(1) | 7.5 × 10−4 |
| M88 | ? | (TC)59 | 100 | 3 | −1(2), -2(1) | 2.7 × 10−4 |
| M80 | ? | (CAGC)64 | 100 | 2 | +1(2) | 2.1 × 10−4 |
| M83 | ? | (TTCAA)64 | 100 | 7 | +1(7) | 6.5 × 10−4 |
Mutation rate is calculated per locus per generation (the number of lines assessed for each marker may differ). Mutation rates given in parentheses are based on single mutation events.
Figure 2Frequency of perfect microsatellite loci, TRF-strict method.