Literature DB >> 22973414

Persistent spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a common complication in patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and a high score in the model for end-stage liver disease.

Archita P Desai1, Nancy Reau, K Gautham Reddy, Helen S Te, Smruti Mohanty, Rohit Satoskar, Amanda Devoss, Donald Jensen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is associated with a high mortality rate. After antibiotic therapy, improvement in fluid polymorphonuclear (PMN) cell count is expected within 2 days. However, our institution recognized cases unresponsive to standard treatment.
METHODS: To study these recalcitrant cases, we completed a retrospective chart review of patients admitted for SBP to the University of Chicago from 2002 to 2007. SBP was defined by an ascitic PMN cell count ≥250/ml.
RESULTS: Of 55 patients with SBP, 15 did not show improvement in fluid PMN cell count to below 250/ml with standard treatment, leading to a prevalence of 27%. The patients with persistent SBP were younger than those with nonpersistent SBP [mean (SD) 51.80 (9.84) compared with 58.13 (8.79); p = 0.0253]. Persistent SBP had a higher serum ascites albumin gradient (SAAG) [median (Q1, Q3) 1.85 (1.50, 2.41) compared with 1.10 (0.60, 1.60)] and a higher score in the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) [mean (SD) 27.98 (8.09) compared with 22.22 (8.10)] than nonpersistent SBP patients; p = 0.027 and p = 0.023, respectively. In addition, persistent SBP patients were more likely to have a positive ascitic fluid culture than nonpersistent SBP patients [odds ratio (OR) (95% CI) 4.33 (1.21, 15.47); p = 0.024]. Importantly, in-hospital mortality in the persistent SBP group was 40%, compared with 22.5% in the nonpersistent SBP group [OR = 2.30 (0.64, 8.19); p = 0.20].
CONCLUSIONS: The risk of persistent SBP is nearly 40% in patients with MELD score >25, SAAG >1.5 or positive ascitic fluid culture. Furthermore, patients who develop persistent SBP tend to experience a higher mortality rate. This study underscores the importance of further examination of this vulnerable population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ascites; cirrhosis; model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score; portal hypertension; spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

Year:  2012        PMID: 22973414      PMCID: PMC3437533          DOI: 10.1177/1756283X11417037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1756-283X            Impact factor:   4.409


  27 in total

1.  Polymorphonuclear cell count response and duration of antibiotic therapy in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

Authors:  T L Fong; E A Akriviadis; B A Runyon; T B Reynolds
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 17.425

2.  Risk factors for the development of bacterial infections in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis.

Authors:  M Deschênes; J P Villeneuve
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Hyponatremia in cirrhosis: Results of a patient population survey.

Authors:  Paolo Angeli; Florence Wong; Hugh Watson; Pere Ginès
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 17.425

4.  Association between model for end-stage liver disease and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

Authors:  Keith L Obstein; Mical S Campbell; K Rajender Reddy; Yu-Xiao Yang
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 5.  Bacterial infections, sepsis, and multiorgan failure in cirrhosis.

Authors:  Puneeta Tandon; Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao
Journal:  Semin Liver Dis       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.115

6.  Short-term prognosis of cirrhotics with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: multivariate study.

Authors:  J M Llovet; R Planas; R Morillas; J C Quer; E Cabré; J Boix; P Humbert; M Guilera; E Doménech; X Bertrán
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Ascitic fluid infection in patients with hepatitis B virus-related liver cirrhosis: culture-negative neutrocytic ascites versus spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

Authors:  Seung Up Kim; Do Young Kim; Chun Kyon Lee; Jun Yong Park; Sun Hye Kim; Hee Man Kim; Eun Hee Choi; Sinyoung Kim; Kwang-Hyub Han; Chae Yoon Chon; Sang Hoon Ahn
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-10-19       Impact factor: 4.029

8.  Role of host and bacterial virulence factors in Escherichia coli spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

Authors:  Ferran Cereto; Xavier Herranz; Eva Moreno; Antònia Andreu; Mertxe Vergara; Dionisia Fontanals; Mercè Roget; Maria Simó; Antonio González; Guillem Prats; Joan Genescà
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.566

Review 9.  Does this patient have bacterial peritonitis or portal hypertension? How do I perform a paracentesis and analyze the results?

Authors:  Camilla L Wong; Jayna Holroyd-Leduc; Kevin E Thorpe; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Low-protein-concentration ascitic fluid is predisposed to spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

Authors:  B A Runyon
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Therapy for alcoholic liver disease.

Authors:  Maryconi M Jaurigue; Mitchell S Cappell
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Enterococcus gallinarum Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in an HCV Cirrhotic.

Authors:  Hussein Abidali; Maheen Sheikh; Moustapha Abidali; Ali Abidali; Hamoudi S Farraji; Andrew C Berry
Journal:  Case Reports Hepatol       Date:  2015-05-07

Review 3.  Role of pregnane X-receptor in regulating bacterial translocation in chronic liver diseases.

Authors:  Sundhar Mohandas; Balasubramaniyan Vairappan
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2017-11-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.