Literature DB >> 22972913

A method for direct localized sound speed estimates using registered virtual detectors.

Brett C Byram1, Gregg E Trahey, Jørgen A Jensen.   

Abstract

Accurate sound speed estimates are desirable in a number of fields. In an effort to increase the spatial resolution of sound speed estimates, a new method is proposed for direct measurement of sound speed between arbitrary spatial locations. The method uses the sound speed estimator developed by Anderson and Trahey. Their least squares fit of the received waveform's curvature provides an estimate of the wave's point of origin. The point of origin and the delay profile calculated from the fit are used to arrive at a spatially registered virtual detector. Between a pair of registered virtual detectors, a spherical wave is propagated. By beamforming the data, the time-of-flight between the two virtual sources can be calculated. From this information, the local sound speed can be estimated. Validation of the estimator is made using phantom and simulation data. The set of test phantoms consisted of both homogeneous and inhomogeneous media. Several different inhomogeneous phantom configurations were used for the physical validation. The simulation validation focused on the limits of target depth and signal-to-noise ratio on virtual detector registration. The simulations also compare the impact of two- and three-layer inhomogeneous media. The phantom results varied based on signal-to-noise ratio and geometry. The results for all cases were generally less than 1% mean error and standard deviation. The simulation results varied somewhat with depth and F/#, but primarily, they varied with signal-to-noise ratio and geometry. With two-layer geometries, the algorithm has a worst-case spatial registration bias of 0.02%. With three-layer geometries, the axial registration error gets worse with a bias magnitude up to 2.1% but is otherwise relatively stable over depth. The stability over depth of the bias in a given medium still allows for accurate sound speed estimates with a mean relative error less than 0.2%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22972913      PMCID: PMC3479243          DOI: 10.1177/0161734612455576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrason Imaging        ISSN: 0161-7346            Impact factor:   1.578


  18 in total

Review 1.  Compilation of empirical ultrasonic properties of mammalian tissues. II.

Authors:  S A Goss; R L Johnston; F Dunn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Ultrasonic wave speed measurement using the time-delay profile of rf-backscattered signals: simulation and experimental results.

Authors:  Fernando R Pereira; João C Machado; Wagner C A Pereira
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  In-vivo synthetic aperture flow imaging in medical ultrasound.

Authors:  Svetoslav Ivanov Nikolov; Jørgen Arendt Jensen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Sound speed estimation using automatic ultrasound image registration.

Authors:  Jochen F Krücker; J Brian Fowlkes; Paul L Carson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Ultrasonic sound velocity measurement in samples of soft materials through under-resonance excitation.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Ammann; Victor Apablaza; Belfor Galaz; Carolina Flores
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Imaging with unfocused regions of focused ultrasound beams.

Authors:  Roger Zemp; Michael F Insana
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Synthetic receive aperture imaging with phase correction for motion and for tissue inhomogeneities. I. Basic principles.

Authors:  L F Nock; G E Trahey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 8.  Comprehensive compilation of empirical ultrasonic properties of mammalian tissues.

Authors:  S A Goss; R L Johnston; F Dunn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Breast imaging in coronal planes with simultaneous pulse echo and transmission ultrasound.

Authors:  P L Carson; C R Meyer; A L Scherzinger; T V Oughton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-12-04       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Synthetic receive aperture imaging with phase correction for motion and for tissue inhomogeneities. II. Effects of and correction for motion.

Authors:  G E Trahey; L F Nock
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.725

View more
  4 in total

1.  Local speed of sound estimation in tissue using pulse-echo ultrasound: Model-based approach.

Authors:  Marko Jakovljevic; Scott Hsieh; Rehman Ali; Gustavo Chau Loo Kung; Dongwoon Hyun; Jeremy J Dahl
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Passive Cavitation Mapping by Cavitation Source Localization From Aperture-Domain Signals-Part I: Theory and Validation Through Simulations.

Authors:  Arsenii V Telichko; Taehwa Lee; Marko Jakovljevic; Jeremy J Dahl
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Refraction correction in 3D transcranial ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Brooks D Lindsey; Stephen W Smith
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.578

Review 4.  Quantitative Evaluation of Hepatic Steatosis Using Advanced Imaging Techniques: Focusing on New Quantitative Ultrasound Techniques.

Authors:  Junghoan Park; Jeong Min Lee; Gunwoo Lee; Sun Kyung Jeon; Ijin Joo
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 3.500

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.