| Literature DB >> 22972604 |
Ruth Barn1, Deborah E Turner, Daniel Rafferty, Roger D Sturrock, James Woodburn.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare electromyographic (EMG), kinematic, kinetic, and ultrasound (US) features of pes plano valgus associated with US-confirmed tibialis posterior (TP) tenosynovitis in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and healthy control subjects.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 22972604 PMCID: PMC3652033 DOI: 10.1002/acr.21859
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ISSN: 2151-464X Impact factor: 4.794
Demographic and disease characteristics*
| Variable | RA group (n = 10) | Control group (n = 5) |
|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 50 ± 9 | 47 ± 6 |
| Sex, M:F | 4:6 | 2:3 |
| Disease duration, median (range) years | 3 (1–18) | – |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 30 ± 6 | 24 ± 1 |
| DAS28 score | 4.6 ± 1.6 | – |
| FIS impairment subscale (range 0–21) | 14 ± 3 | 0 ± 1 |
| FIS disability subscale (range 0–30) | 21 ± 5 | 0 ± 0 |
| HAQ score | 1.3 ± 0.6 | 0 ± 0 |
| Foot pain VAS (0–100 mm) | 46 ± 19 | 1 ± 1 |
| General health VAS (0–100 mm) | 44 ± 26 | 1 ± 2 |
| Arthritis VAS (0–100 mm) | 51 ± 19 | – |
| Structural index: rearfoot (range 0–7) | 2 ± 1 | 1 ± 1 |
| Structural index: forefoot (range 0–12) | 4 ± 3 | 3 ± 3 |
| Swollen foot joint count (range 0–14) | 0 ± 1 | 0 ± 0 |
| Tender foot joint count (range 0–14) | 7 ± 3 | 0 ± 0 |
| Barefoot walking speed (meters/second) | 1.00 ± 0.14 | 1.25 ± 0.15 |
| Weight-bearing rearfoot alignment, degrees | −7 ± 3 | −4 ± 2 |
Values are the mean ± SD unless indicated otherwise. RA = rheumatoid arthritis; DAS28 = Disease Activity Score in 28 joints; FIS = Foot Impact Scale for RA; HAQ = Health Assessment Questionnaire; VAS = visual analog scale.
By convention, eversion angles are expressed as negative.
Key kinematic and kinetic variables*
| Segment and variable | RA barefoot (n = 10) | Control barefoot (n = 5) | Mean difference (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rearfoot | ||||
| Peak eversion, degrees | −5 ± 5 | −3 ± 5 | −2 (−8, 4) | 0.53 |
| Peak plantarflexion, degrees | −6 ± 3 | −7 ± 4 | 2 (−3, 6) | 0.44 |
| Peak ankle joint power, W/kg | 1.7 ± 0.8 | 3.1 ± 0.6 | −1 (−2, 0) | 0.005 |
| Peak ankle joint moment, Nm/kg | −1.2 ± 0.3 | −1.4 ± 0.1 | 0.2 (0, 0.5) | 0.11 |
| Midfoot | ||||
| Lowest navicular height, mm | 29 ± 9 | 41 ± 7 | −12 (−22, −2) | 0.02 |
| Peak inversion, degrees | 7 ± 6 | 2 ± 5 | 6 (−1, 13) | 0.08 |
| Forefoot | ||||
| Peak abduction, degrees | −5 ± 7 | 2 ± 4 | −6 (−13, 1) | 0.07 |
| Peak dorsiflexion, degrees | 8 ± 2 | 6 ± 1 | 3 (0, 5) | 0.02 |
Values are the mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated. RA = rheumatoid arthritis; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval.
By independent-samples t-test.
Significant at P < 0.05.
Figure 1Motion and force time curves. Shaded area shows the mean ± SD for 5 control participants; bars show the mean ± SD for 10 rheumatoid arthritis patients.
Key discrete EMG variables*
| Muscle and variable | RA barefoot (n = 10) | Control barefoot (n = 5) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medial gastrocnemius | |||
| Peak MS/P | 83 (59–128) | 81 (65–106) | 1.00 |
| Time of peak MS/P | 46 (34–65) | 63 (52–69) | 0.19 |
| Peroneus longus | |||
| Peak contact | 43 (28–86) | 19 (6–65) | 0.12 |
| Time of peak contact | 9 (5–15) | 5 (4–12) | 0.35 |
| Peak MS/P | 70 (43–105) | 39 (36–59) | 0.11 |
| Time of peak MS/P | 68 (38–77) | 69 (56–78) | 0.75 |
| Soleus | |||
| Peak MS/P | 69 (31–84) | 95 (68–123) | 0.08 |
| Time of peak MS/P | 61 (48–63) | 64 (63–67) | 0.04 |
| Tibialis anterior | |||
| Peak contact | 49 (32–56) | 27 (16–44) | 0.07 |
| Time of peak contact | 6 (0–6) | 0 (0–8) | 0.94 |
| Tibialis posterior | |||
| Peak contact | 48 (35–116) | 22 (14–28) | 0.007 |
| Time of peak contact | 13 (8–15) | 7 (5–8) | 0.03 |
| Peak MS/P | 94 (56–261) | 51 (22–80) | 0.06 |
| Time of peak MS/P | 64 (60–68) | 74 (72–75) | 0.01 |
Values are the median (interquartile range) unless indicated otherwise. Magnitude data expressed as percentage of maximum voluntary isometric contractions; temporal data expressed as percentage stance. EMG = electromyography; RA = rheumatoid arthritis; MS/P = combined midstance/propulsive phase gait.
By Mann-Whitney U test.
Significant at P < 0.05.
Figure 2Electromyography activation profiles. Data expressed relative to maximum voluntary isometric contractions (MVICs) during the stance phase. Shaded area shows the mean ± SD for 5 control participants; bars show the mean ± SD for 10 rheumatoid arthritis patients.
Ultrasound features of the tibialis posterior (TP) tendon*
| RA cohort (n = 10) | Published normal values | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Mean ± SD | Range | Mean ± SD | Range |
| TP transverse, mm | 9.4 ± 0.9 | 7.4–10.9 | 8.4 ± 4.2 | 3.1–14.1 |
| TP longitudinal, mm | 4.9 ± 1.1 | 3.0–6.0 | 2.8 ± 1.8 | 1.3–6.0 |
| Ratio longitudinal:transverse | 0.53 ± 0.12 | 0.30–0.64 | 0.30 ± 0.14 | 0.20–0.46 |
| Fluid transverse, mm | 2.3 ± 1.6 | 0.7–4.9 | 1.2 ± 1.6 | 0.2–3.8 |
| Fluid longitudinal, mm | 1.3 ± 1.0 | 0.0–2.8 | ||
Published values from 102 control subjects (33); normative ratio values from 15 control subjects (32). RA = rheumatoid arthritis.
2 SDs.