Literature DB >> 22972561

Systematic assessment of scaffold distances in ChEMBL: prioritization of compound data sets for scaffold hopping analysis in virtual screening.

Ruifang Li1, Jürgen Bajorath.   

Abstract

The evaluation of the scaffold hopping potential of computational methods is of high relevance for virtual screening. For benchmark calculations, classes of known active compounds are utilized. Ideally, such classes should have a well-defined content of structurally diverse scaffolds. However, in reported benchmark investigations, the choice of activity classes is often difficult to rationalize. To provide a compendium of well-characterized test cases for the assessment of scaffold hopping potential, structural distances between scaffolds were systematically calculated for compound classes available in the ChEMBL database. Nearly seven million scaffold pairs were evaluated. On the basis of the global scaffold distance distribution, a threshold value for large scaffold distances was determined. Compound data sets were ranked based on the proportion of scaffold pairs with large distances they contained, taking additional criteria into account that are relevant for virtual screening. A set of 50 activity classes is provided that represent attractive test cases for scaffold hopping analysis and benchmark calculations.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22972561     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-012-9603-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  10 in total

1.  "Scaffold-Hopping" by Topological Pharmacophore Search: A Contribution to Virtual Screening.

Authors: 
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  1999-10-04       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  Development of a method to consistently quantify the structural distance between scaffolds and to assess scaffold hopping potential.

Authors:  Ruifang Li; Dagmar Stumpfe; Martin Vogt; Hanna Geppert; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  Scaffold hopping using two-dimensional fingerprints: true potential, black magic, or a hopeless endeavor? Guidelines for virtual screening.

Authors:  Martin Vogt; Dagmar Stumpfe; Hanna Geppert; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Extended-connectivity fingerprints.

Authors:  David Rogers; Mathew Hahn
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  ZINC--a free database of commercially available compounds for virtual screening.

Authors:  John J Irwin; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 6.  On scaffolds and hopping in medicinal chemistry.

Authors:  Nathan Brown; Edgar Jacoby
Journal:  Mini Rev Med Chem       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.862

Review 7.  Current trends in ligand-based virtual screening: molecular representations, data mining methods, new application areas, and performance evaluation.

Authors:  Hanna Geppert; Martin Vogt; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Lessons learned from molecular scaffold analysis.

Authors:  Ye Hu; Dagmar Stumpfe; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  The properties of known drugs. 1. Molecular frameworks.

Authors:  G W Bemis; M A Murcko
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1996-07-19       Impact factor: 7.446

10.  ChEMBL: a large-scale bioactivity database for drug discovery.

Authors:  Anna Gaulton; Louisa J Bellis; A Patricia Bento; Jon Chambers; Mark Davies; Anne Hersey; Yvonne Light; Shaun McGlinchey; David Michalovich; Bissan Al-Lazikani; John P Overington
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 16.971

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Docking to multiple pockets or ligand fields for screening, activity prediction and scaffold hopping.

Authors:  Yu-Chen Chen; Max Totrov; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.808

2.  Follow up: Compound data sets and software tools for chemoinformatics and medicinal chemistry applications: update and data transfer.

Authors:  Ye Hu; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2014-03-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.