Literature DB >> 22972553

Precise control of osteogenesis for craniofacial defect repair: the role of direct osteoprogenitor contact in BMP-2-based bioprinting.

Darren M Smith1, James J Cray, Lee E Weiss, Elmer K Dai Fei, Sameer Shakir, S Alex Rottgers, Joseph E Losee, Philip G Campbell, Gregory M Cooper.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Success with bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) has been widely reported in the osseous reconstruction of large calvarial defects. These efforts have required enormous doses of BMP-2 and are not sufficiently refined to facilitate the detail-oriented repair required for intricate craniofacial structures. We have previously shown that inkjet-based bioprinting technologies allow for precisely customized low-dose protein patterns to induce spatially regulated osteogenesis. Here, we investigate the importance of direct contact between bioprinted BMP-2 and the dura mater (a source of osteoprogenitors) in mediating calvarial healing.
METHODS: Five-millimeter osseous defects were trephinated in mouse parietal bones (N=8). Circular acellular dermal matrix (ADM) implants were prepared such that 1 semicircle of 1 face per implant was printed with BMP-2 bio-ink. These implants were then placed ink-toward (N=3) or ink-away (N=5) from the underlying dura mater. After 4 weeks, osteogenesis was assessed in each of the 4 possible positions (BMP-2-printed area toward dura, BMP-2-printed area away from dura, unprinted area toward dura, and unprinted area away from dura) by faxitron.
RESULTS: The BMP-2-printed portion of the ADM generated bone covering an average of 66.5% of its surface area when it was face-down (printed surface directly abutting dura mater). By comparison, the BMP-2-printed portion of the ADM generated bone covering an average of only 21.3% of its surface area when it was face-up (printed surface away from dura). Similarly, the unprinted portion of the ADM generated an average of only 18.6% osseous coverage when face-down and 18.4% when face-up.
CONCLUSIONS: We have previously shown that inkjet-based bioprinting has the potential to significantly enhance the role of regenerative therapies in craniofacial surgery. This technology affords the precise control of osteogenesis necessary to reconstruct this region's intricate anatomical architecture. In the present study, we demonstrate that direct apposition of BMP-2-printed ADM to a source of osteoprogenitor cells (in this case dura mater) is necessary for bio-ink-directed osteogenesis to occur. These results have important implications for the design of more complex bioprinted osseous structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22972553     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31824cfe64

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  8 in total

1.  Human amniotic membrane for guided bone regeneration of calvarial defects in mice.

Authors:  Mathilde Fénelon; Olivier Chassande; Jérome Kalisky; Florelle Gindraux; Stéphanie Brun; Reine Bareille; Zoran Ivanovic; Jean-Christophe Fricain; Claudine Boiziau
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  Perinatal stem cells: A promising cell resource for tissue engineering of craniofacial bone.

Authors:  Jia-Wen Si; Xu-Dong Wang; Steve Gf Shen
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 5.326

3.  Inkjet-based biopatterning of SDF-1β augments BMP-2-induced repair of critical size calvarial bone defects in mice.

Authors:  Samuel Herberg; Galina Kondrikova; Sudharsan Periyasamy-Thandavan; R Nicole Howie; Mohammed E Elsalanty; Lee Weiss; Phil Campbell; William D Hill; James J Cray
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Spatial patterning of BMP-2 and BMP-7 on biopolymeric films and the guidance of muscle cell fate.

Authors:  Jorge Almodóvar; Raphaël Guillot; Claire Monge; Julien Vollaire; Seila Selimović; Jean-Luc Coll; Ali Khademhosseini; Catherine Picart
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 5.  * Calvarial Defects: Cell-Based Reconstructive Strategies in the Murine Model.

Authors:  Matthew P Murphy; Natalina Quarto; Michael T Longaker; Derrick C Wan
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.273

Review 6.  3D Bioprinting Stem Cell Derived Tissues.

Authors:  Nishat Tasnim; Laura De la Vega; Shweta Anil Kumar; Laila Abelseth; Matthew Alonzo; Meitham Amereh; Binata Joddar; Stephanie M Willerth
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 3.337

7.  Mesenchymal stem cell expression of SDF-1β synergizes with BMP-2 to augment cell-mediated healing of critical-sized mouse calvarial defects.

Authors:  Samuel Herberg; Alexandra Aguilar-Perez; R Nicole Howie; Galina Kondrikova; Sudharsan Periyasamy-Thandavan; Mohammed E Elsalanty; Xingming Shi; William D Hill; James J Cray
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.963

Review 8.  Bioinks and bioprinting technologies to make heterogeneous and biomimetic tissue constructs.

Authors:  N Ashammakhi; S Ahadian; C Xu; H Montazerian; H Ko; R Nasiri; N Barros; A Khademhosseini
Journal:  Mater Today Bio       Date:  2019-05-25
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.