BACKGROUND:Patients with the metabolic syndrome (MetS) can suffer from poor metabolic parameters through lack of adherence to requisite lifestyle changes in dietary and physical activity. Usually, interventions in MetS patients are infrequent face-to-face consultations. The low frequency or absence of counseling interviews leads to a shortage of information and motivation to adhere to the recommended lifestyle changes. Telephone interventions could be an additional low-cost tool for effective interventions. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of telephone intervention in improving lifestyle habits and metabolic parameters in MetS patients compared with similar face-to-face or a usual care interventions. METHODS:Eighty-seven MetS patients recruited from the outpatient clinic of a major public hospital were randomly assigned to one of the three intervention groups: "usual care", "telephone" or "face-to-face". At the beginning of the study, all patients were provided with a hypocaloric Mediterranean-type diet. Afterwards, patients in the telephone group received 7 dietary counseling calls, patients in the face-to-face group participated in 7 one-to-one dietary counseling sessions, while patients in the usual care group received no other contact until the end of the study, 6 months later. All patients underwent full medical and nutritional evaluation at the beginning and at the end of the intervention. RESULTS: At the end of the intervention, 42% of the participants no longer showed symptoms of MetS; the reduction rates differed significantly between the groups (p = 0.024), with those in the face-to-face and telephone group exhibiting similar rates (52% and 54%, respectively, vs. 21% in the usual care group). Between-group analysis revealed that the face-to-face group achieved the greatest improvement in metabolic parameters, while the telephone group had the greatest improvement in dietary adherence compared with the usual care group. CONCLUSIONS:Telephone counseling is an effective way to implement behavioral counseling to improve lifestyle habits in MetS patients.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Patients with the metabolic syndrome (MetS) can suffer from poor metabolic parameters through lack of adherence to requisite lifestyle changes in dietary and physical activity. Usually, interventions in MetS patients are infrequent face-to-face consultations. The low frequency or absence of counseling interviews leads to a shortage of information and motivation to adhere to the recommended lifestyle changes. Telephone interventions could be an additional low-cost tool for effective interventions. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of telephone intervention in improving lifestyle habits and metabolic parameters in MetS patients compared with similar face-to-face or a usual care interventions. METHODS: Eighty-seven MetS patients recruited from the outpatient clinic of a major public hospital were randomly assigned to one of the three intervention groups: "usual care", "telephone" or "face-to-face". At the beginning of the study, all patients were provided with a hypocaloric Mediterranean-type diet. Afterwards, patients in the telephone group received 7 dietary counseling calls, patients in the face-to-face group participated in 7 one-to-one dietary counseling sessions, while patients in the usual care group received no other contact until the end of the study, 6 months later. All patients underwent full medical and nutritional evaluation at the beginning and at the end of the intervention. RESULTS: At the end of the intervention, 42% of the participants no longer showed symptoms of MetS; the reduction rates differed significantly between the groups (p = 0.024), with those in the face-to-face and telephone group exhibiting similar rates (52% and 54%, respectively, vs. 21% in the usual care group). Between-group analysis revealed that the face-to-face group achieved the greatest improvement in metabolic parameters, while the telephone group had the greatest improvement in dietary adherence compared with the usual care group. CONCLUSIONS: Telephone counseling is an effective way to implement behavioral counseling to improve lifestyle habits in MetS patients.
Authors: Paula Tighe; Garry Duthie; Nicholas Vaughan; Julie Brittenden; William G Simpson; Susan Duthie; William Mutch; Klaus Wahle; Graham Horgan; Frank Thies Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2010-08-04 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Penny M Kris-Etherton; Denise Shaffer Taylor; Helen Smiciklas-Wright; Diane C Mitchell; Tanja C Bekhuis; Beth H Olson; Amy B Slonim Journal: J Am Diet Assoc Date: 2002-04
Authors: Hae-Ra Han; Jiyun Kim; Kim B Kim; Seonghee Jeong; David Levine; Chunyu Li; Heejung Song; Miyong T Kim Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2009-11-30
Authors: Elizabeth Eakin; Marina Reeves; Sheleigh Lawler; Nick Graves; Brian Oldenburg; Chris Del Mar; Ken Wilke; Elizabeth Winkler; Adrian Barnett Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2008-12-05 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Nicholas Graves; Adrian G Barnett; Kate A Halton; Jacob L Veerman; Elisabeth Winkler; Neville Owen; Marina M Reeves; Alison Marshall; Elizabeth Eakin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-09-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Enrique Albert Pérez; Marina Poveda González; Rosa María Martínez-Espinosa; Mariola D Molina Vila; Manuel Reig García-Galbis Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-09-18 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Stephen Barrett; Stephen Begg; Paul O'Halloran; Owen Howlett; Jack Lawrence; Michael Kingsley Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 6.457