Literature DB >> 22972386

Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria rather than ammonia-oxidizing archaea were widely distributed in animal manure composts from field-scale facilities.

Nozomi Yamamoto1, Ryu Oishi, Yoshihisa Suyama, Chika Tada, Yutaka Nakai.   

Abstract

The distribution of ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) and bacteria (AOB) in cattle, swine, and chicken manure compost was analyzed. PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) showed that a Candidatus Nitrososphaera gargensis-like sequence dominated in cattle manure compost, while few AOA were detected in other composts. In the case of AOB, Nitrosomonas-like sequences were detected with higher diversity in cattle and swine manure composts. The relative abundance of ammonia oxidizers by real-time PCR revealed that more AOB was present in compost except in one swine manure compost. Our results indicated that AOB rather than AOA are widely distributed in animal manure compost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22972386      PMCID: PMC4103565          DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.me12053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbes Environ        ISSN: 1342-6311            Impact factor:   2.912


Nitrification with ammonia oxidation occurs naturally during treatment of animal manure via composting (29). It is viewed as a key process in N dynamics, because nitrogen loss impacts compost quality as well as environmental health and pollution (e.g., NH3 emission and nitrate leaching) through nitrification (1, 18). Ammonia oxidizers are key players because ammonia oxidation is a rate-limiting process in autotrophic nitrification (11). Until recently, it was believed that only ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) oxidize ammonia to nitrite in the composting process. In a previous study, both Nitrosomonas spp. and Nitrosospira spp. clusters were present throughout the composting process (6, 7, 10, 16). But in recent years, archaeal organisms, called ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA), have been discovered in soil and marine environments and are significant contributors to ammonia oxidation (8, 28). A positive relationship was also observed between the potential ammonia oxidizing (PAO) rate and archaeal amoA gene abundance during thermophilic and cooling stages of composting from agricultural waste (35). As for cattle manure compost, one study detected the archaeal amoA gene and related 16S rRNA gene with low diversity (31, 32). Our group also revealed that an archaeon related to Candidatus Nitrososphaera gargensis was dominant in liquid cultures seeded with cattle manure compost (20); however, there is no information about AOA community in other animal manure compost. To clearly understand the nitrification process in compost ecosystems, we researched ammonia oxidizers in various animal composts. Compost samples were collected from November 2009 to November 2010 from ten different facilities (Table 1). Compost samples were obtained approximately 30 cm from the surface of the source material. Manure samples were obtained from the surface of the material. Water content was determined by wet weight minus dry weight after placing in a drying oven at 105°C overnight. PH was measured using compost suspension with a pH meter (WM-22EP; DKK-TOA, Tokyo, Japan). To estimate the concentration of inorganic nitrogen ions, materials were made into a compost suspension by the addition of deionized water in a compost : water ratio of 1:10. The suspension was then filtered through the 0.45 μm cellulose acetate filter (Advantec Toyo, Tokyo, Japan) to provide for ICS-1000 and ICS-2000 ion chromatography systems (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The carbon:nitrogen (C:N) ratio was calculated using triplicate freeze-dried samples with an N and C determination unit (Sumigraph NC-80S; Sumika Chemical Analysis Service, Osaka, Japan). Chemical and physical properties of the samples are listed in Table 2. Total DNA was extracted from 0.05 g freeze-dried samples using the Favorgen DNA Isolation kit (Favorgen Biotech Corporation, Taiwan) in duplicate. After purification by ethanol precipitation with PelletPaint NF Co-Precipitant (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), the bacterial amoA gene and archaeal amoA gene were amplified with the primer set amoA1F/amoA2R-I (5) and AOA23F/AOA616R (26), respectively. A GC clump was attached to the forward primer amoA1F (5). PCR and DGGE conditions were as described by Yamamoto et al. (32), with some modification. Taq DNA polymerase (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan) was used to amplify the bacterial amoA gene. Gel staining, band excision, and sequencing of DNA bands were performed in accordance with Yamamoto et al. (31). Phylogenetic trees for the archaeal and bacterial amoA genes were constructed using Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software ver. 4.0.1 (24). Unrooted phylogenetic trees were generated using the neighbor-joining method and bootstrap tests were performed with 1,000 replicates.
Table 1

Information of samples analyzed in this study

FacilityMain raw manureAmendmentsProcessing conditions

1st period2nd period

TypeaNo. of daysAerationTypeaNo. of daysAeration
ADairy cattleRice chaffopen20yespile40no
BBeef cattleRice chaffopen30yespile20no
CDairy and beef cattleRice chaffopen20yespile30no
DCattle and swineRice chaff and finished compostopen20yespile40no
ECattle and swineRice chaff and finished compostopen10yesND14ND
FSwineRice chaffpile60no
GSwineSawdust, finished compost and rice branopen25yes
HSwineFinished compostopen25yes
IChickenFinished compostpile70yes
JChickenBark and finished compostpileNDyesopenNDyes

, open type means the type that composting material was turned by turning conveyor belt or rotary device, and pile type means the type that material was turned by shovel loader.

ND, no data; —, not conducted.

Table 2

Chemical parameters of samples analyzed in this study

FacilityComposting stageaChemical parameters

Temperature (°C)Water content (%)pHTotal N (%DM)C/N ratioNH4+ (gN/kgDW)NO2 (gN/kgDW)NO3 (gN/kgDW)
Ah52.058.539.181.919.30.480ND0.118
f20.761.029.162.214.70.167ND0.591
Bh70.468.599.051.919.53.101ND0.165
f22.428.107.772.615.40.917ND2.509
Ch70.955.539.172.415.01.462ND0.111
f32.539.538.802.414.90.290ND0.421
DmNA75.357.042.816.38.200NDND
h61.159.719.531.820.31.877NDND
f38.330.709.661.918.50.745ND0.007
EmNA74.936.263.921.810.290NDND
h72.753.708.832.713.44.234ND0.005
f29.025.239.452.512.71.073ND0.167
FmNA69.79NA2.217.97.610NDND
h68.757.39NA1.326.11.2710.0620.053
f43.345.03NA1.421.80.710ND0.054
GmNA77.445.973.014.17.300NDND
h59.042.337.972.913.54.439ND0.002
f35.029.868.503.59.91.658ND1.192
HmNA72.488.123.810.73.210NDND
h71.544.638.505.37.35.569ND0.006
f36.924.268.785.47.12.582ND0.069
ImNA66.906.434.85.73.650ND0.001
h72.028.348.654.85.92.8070.0320.051
f35.018.048.643.96.52.351ND0.219
Jh67.154.599.861.719.21.177ND0.001
f51.340.0410.021.917.20.407ND0.034

, m indicates fresh manure, h indicates high temperature stage, and f indicates finished compost.

ND, not detected; NA, not analyzed.

AOB and AOA amoA gene copy numbers were determined using real-time PCR for samples that confirmed the presence of each organism by PCR amplification. PCR amplification was conducted with SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (TaKaRa) using the primer sets amoA1F/amoA2R (23) and AOA23F/AOA616R (26), respectively. As standards for real-time PCR, plasmid DNA, including the bacterial amoA gene from compost (for AOB) or the archaeal amoA gene from enrichment culture (for AOA [20]) was used. PCR conditions and statistical tests were performed as described by Yamamoto et al. (32). One DGGE band, indicated as group NG in Fig. 1, was ubiquitous in the profiles of cattle manure compost, and was closely related (97–100% sequence identity) to a sequence previously detected from cattle manure compost (31). This sequence was grouped into Candidatus Nitrososphaera gargensis, which are enriched from 46°C hot springs (4) and can resist high temperatures. The DGGE profile from facility A generated several bands, indicating that the AOA community was relatively diverse. In samples from other facilities, only one to four bands were detected. In the case of swine manure compost, samples from one of three facilities resulted in detectable PCR amplification. The presence of AOA in swine manure compost was thought to be rare because another study reported that the archaeal community consisted of mainly methanogen and uncultured Crenarchaeota (12). Another sequence, which was identical to the sequence found in cattle manure compost, was detected in samples from facility H. Because the finished compost could have a diverse microbial community (25), the archaeal amoA sequence detected in facility H may have been the result of a two-fold amount of finished compost being mixed with fresh manure as the starting material for composting.
Fig. 1

Phylogenetic tree of the archaeal amoA sequences obtained from composting materials. Boot-strap values (>60%) are indicated at the branch points. All sequences obtained from this study are given in bold. Capital and small letters after ‘AOA_’ indicate the sampling facility and sampling point, respectively. Samples were obtained from each facility from fresh manure (m), the high-temperature stage (h), and the end of composting (f). The last letter indicates the band name. Scale bar represents 5% sequence divergence. Accession numbers are given in parentheses.

No archaeal amoA sequences were detected in any fresh manure samples, in agreement with a previous study in which PCR failed to amplify archaeal amoA gene sequences from cattle manure (31). In addition, the archaeal amoA gene was not amplified using mixed samples of cattle and swine manure. Similarly, PCR also failed to amplify sequences from samples of chicken manure compost. Further research is needed to confirm which condition is critical for the survival of ammonia oxidizers in animal manure compost. Our results indicate that AOA might be a minor part of the microbial community of animal manure compost, with the exception of cattle manure, because few archaeal amoA sequences were observed in swine and chicken manure composts. Nonetheless, it seems that specific AOA species can survive in cattle manure compost under harsh conditions and environmental factors. One possible factor for the presence of AOA is relatively low ammonium concentration, as a previous study reported (2, 8, 17). In natural environments, such as seawater and soil, the ammonium concentration may be the key determinant of AOA niche (3). There is little information on AOA that live in environments with high ammonium concentrations, such as activated sludge, and therefore few AOA have been identified (30, 34). Notably, Ca. Nitrososphaera gargensis-like sequences were not detected in composting materials with >3.1 mg N kg−1 (fresh weight), which is equivalent to 221 mM ammonium. Related AOA is active at 0.14 and 0.79 mM ammonium and is partially inhibited by a concentration of 3.08 mM (4). Our previous study found that archaeal amoA copy numbers increase significantly at 46°C and 10 mM ammonium after 2-week incubation of cattle manure compost inoculated into liquid culture (20). Nitrososhaera viennensis, which was originally isolated from garden soil, showed a similar physiological property of growing in ammonium concentrations of up to 15 mM (27); therefore, Nitrososphaera spp. could survive under relatively higher ammonium concentrations. Another possible factor was the changes in temperature during the composting process. It was unsurprising that detected amoA sequences were derived from moderately thermophilic AOAs since Ca. Nitrososphaera gargensis, to which most sequences were related, was enriched at 46°C (4). Some AOA, such as those found in compost, are resistant to high temperatures (22, 33); however, we did not detect Ca. Nitrososphaera gargensis-like sequences in samples from Facility J, despite their low levels of ammonium (1.177 and 0.407 g N−1DM). Park et al. (21) investigated various activated sludge samples from nine wastewater plants and found that both amoA genes were detected at four plants, whereas some plant samples had only one gene. The authors of that study speculated that low dissolved oxygen (DO) levels and long retention times contributed to the growth of AOA. Like activated sludge, other factors, such as oxygen concentration, may have affected which AOA species dominated the composting material. As shown in the phylogenetic tree, the bacterial amoA sequence showed greater diversity in fresh manure than in compost in the high-temperature or mature stage (Fig. 2). Low diversity of the AOB amoA sequence was previously reported in a study of the cattle manure composting process, indicating that the composting process was a harsh environment for AOB species (32). Maeda et al. (16) reported a large number of bacterial amoA sequences in the surface of compost piles, depending on the accumulation of nitrite or nitrate. Our results are consistent with this, and furthermore confirm that particular AOB species survive and actively grow at high temperatures in each composting process. By sequencing analysis, almost all sequences were defined as Nitrosomonas-like amoA gene sequences. This finding is consistent with previous reports that Nitrosomonas europaea-like and/or Nitrosomoas halophila-like amoA genes dominated the cattle manure composting process (16, 32). Nitrosospira-like amoA sequences were found only in the final product from facility C. A strong band occurred in all samples and had an identical sequence to that derived from cattle manure compost (31). In addition, another band was highly similar (99%) to that of the same cattle manure compost sample. The diversity of the AOB community was low in the samples derived from swine manure compost, as only 2–3 bands appeared in each sample; however, AOB composition differed among samples. In facility F, two sequences appeared consistently and were related to sequences isolated from activated sludge and cattle manure compost, respectively. Sequences detected in raw manure disappeared and new sequences appeared in other samples from facility H, suggesting that the AOB community structure changed during the composting process. These findings were caused by differences in the chemical parameters, such as ammonium concentration. It was suggested that a low ammonia level might be the key factor dominating the N. oligotropha cluster in most wastewaster treatment systems studied by Limpiyakorn et al. (15). They also described that factors such as ammonia affinity, oxygen affinity, sensitivity to salt and/or nitrite may affect sequence types. Identifying critical factors for AOB sequence diversity requires further study. When chicken manure compost was analyzed by PCR, no amplification was observed for five of six samples. Only the sample from the high-temperature phase of composting from facility J had two DGGE bands, but PCR amplification was not successfully repeated in duplicate. This indicated that few AOB were present in chicken manure compost. A previous study also showed no DNA amplification from chicken manure by PCR for the amoA gene (10).
Fig. 2

Phylogenetic tree of the bacterial amoA sequences obtained from composting materials. Boot-strap values (>60%) are indicated at the branch points. All sequences obtained from this study are given in bold. Capital and small letters after ‘AOB_’ indicate the sampling facility and sampling point, respectively. Samples were obtained from each facility from fresh manure (m), the high-temperature stage (h), and the end of composting (f). The last letter indicates the band name. Scale bar represents 5% sequence divergence. Accession numbers are given in parentheses.

Compost material contained bacterial amoA sequences at high temperature (>50°C), although AOB are grown under mesophilic conditions (9). In the composting process, Nitrosomonas europaea-like sequences have been detected under thermophilic conditions (7, 16). Our findings strongly supported the hypothesis that uncultured thermophilic AOB is present in the high-temperature stage of composting. This is very rare, because only one previous AOB enrichment culture, derived from a hot spring, grew at temperatures of 27–55°C (13). In the analysis of AOB, minor variations between duplicate samples occurred in samples from facilities A, C, and J, even though the samples were freeze-dried and homogenized. This may point to variability in the DNA extraction step, because small sample aliquots were used. Nicol et al. (19) revealed that DGGE profiles generated from triplicate 0.1 g samples showed great heterogeneity, whereas triplicate 10 g samples had similar patterns. In this study, the DGGE band pattern was slightly different between duplicate DNA samples in some materials due to the low abundance of the targeted organism rather than heterogeneity of the material, which was indicated in real-time PCR (Fig. 3). However, it is believed that compost materials have large spatial variation as the distribution of the AOA community was demonstrated in animal manure composts. Mixing core samples collected from different locations enables analysis of the community structure dynamics of AOA during the composting process.
Fig. 3

AmoA gene copy numbers for AOA and AOB. Error bars indicate standard deviation. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate. Samples with gene copy numbers below the detection limit are represented by closed circles (AOA) and open circles (AOB). Capital letter indicates sampling facility. Samples were obtained from each facility from fresh manure (m), the high-temperature stage (h), and the end of composting (f). Samples with a dagger did not undergo real-time PCR.

In cattle manure compost from facilities A and C, the abundance of archaeal amoA genes (4.58 and 6.57×106 copies g−1 DW, respectively) was clearly lower than that of bacterial genes (8.77×107 and 1.03×108 copies g−1 DW, respectively) (Fig. 3). Both amoA gene copy numbers were below the limits of detection (≤105 copies g−1 DW) in samples from facility B. These findings are in contrast to our previous study in which AOA may have been more abundant than AOB during the cooling and maturation stages of composting (32). Real-time PCR confirmed that archaeal amoA gene copy numbers (2.55×107 g−1 DW) were greater than bacterial gene copy numbers (2.42×106 g−1 DW) in the end product at facility H. The AOA:AOB ratios varied from 0.06 to 10.54. Differences in the AOA:AOB ratio were also observed in the tested soil samples, ranging from 1.5 to >230 (14). This variation might have been caused by the operating conditions of composting, such as the addition of finished compost; however, it is unclear which critical factor influences the ratio of AOA to AOB in compost. In this study, it was indicated that AOB rather than AOA contributed to nitrification in animal manure composting. In summary, the distribution and abundance of ammonia oxidizers were analyzed in cattle, swine, and chicken manure composting systems. Specific AOA were detected in cattle manure compost samples and in one swine manure sample tested; however, the proportion of AOA to AOB gene numbers varied, suggested that AOB rather than AOA was distributed in animal manure compost. One possible environmental factor that helps define the ecological niche for ammonia oxidizers may be ammonia concentration, although other factors may also play a role. Based on the present study, it is worth investigating the activity and contribution of AOB to ammonia oxidation during animal manure composting processes; however, it is not impossible that novel AOA species are present in compost, because the primer set used in this study possibly did not amplify all types of the archaeal amoA gene. To measure the contribution of each ammonia oxidizer to the ammonia oxidation process during composting, further studies are needed to evaluate ammonia oxidation activity under changing chemical parameters, such as ammonia concentration and water content, while using the same compost material. In addition, it is also necessary to use multiple primer sets for PCR amplification of the targeting gene.
  29 in total

Review 1.  Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria: a model for molecular microbial ecology.

Authors:  G A Kowalchuk; J R Stephen
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 15.500

2.  Novel genes for nitrite reductase and Amo-related proteins indicate a role of uncultivated mesophilic crenarchaeota in nitrogen cycling.

Authors:  Alexander H Treusch; Sven Leininger; Arnulf Kletzin; Stephan C Schuster; Hans-Peter Klenk; Christa Schleper
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.491

3.  Isolation of an autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing marine archaeon.

Authors:  Martin Könneke; Anne E Bernhard; José R de la Torre; Christopher B Walker; John B Waterbury; David A Stahl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Primers containing universal bases reduce multiple amoA gene specific DGGE band patterns when analysing the diversity of beta-ammonia oxidizers in the environment.

Authors:  Romana Hornek; Andreas Pommerening-Röser; Hans-Peter Koops; Andreas H Farnleitner; Norbert Kreuzinger; Alexander Kirschner; Robert L Mach
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 2.363

5.  Occurrence of ammonia-oxidizing archaea in wastewater treatment plant bioreactors.

Authors:  Hee-Deung Park; George F Wells; Hyokwan Bae; Craig S Criddle; Christopher A Francis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Archaea predominate among ammonia-oxidizing prokaryotes in soils.

Authors:  S Leininger; T Urich; M Schloter; L Schwark; J Qi; G W Nicol; J I Prosser; S C Schuster; C Schleper
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Moderately thermophilic nitrifying bacteria from a hot spring of the Baikal rift zone.

Authors:  Elena V Lebedeva; Mashal Alawi; Claudia Fiencke; Bair Namsaraev; Eberhard Bock; Eva Spieck
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 4.194

8.  Ammonia-oxidizing communities in a highly aerated full-scale activated sludge bioreactor: betaproteobacterial dynamics and low relative abundance of Crenarchaea.

Authors:  George F Wells; Hee-Deung Park; Chok-Hang Yeung; Brad Eggleston; Christopher A Francis; Craig S Criddle
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 5.491

9.  Effects of ammonium and nitrite on communities and populations of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in laboratory-scale continuous-flow reactors.

Authors:  Tawan Limpiyakorn; Futoshi Kurisu; Yoriko Sakamoto; Osami Yagi
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 4.194

10.  Molecular analysis of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria of the beta subdivision of the class Proteobacteria in compost and composted materials.

Authors:  G A Kowalchuk; Z S Naoumenko; P J Derikx; A Felske; J R Stephen; I A Arkhipchenko
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effects of temperature and amendments on nitrogen mineralization in selected Australian soils.

Authors:  Ramya Thangarajan; Nanthi S Bolan; Ravi Naidu; Aravind Surapaneni
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Nitrosomonas stercoris sp. nov., a Chemoautotrophic Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacterium Tolerant of High Ammonium Isolated from Composted Cattle Manure.

Authors:  Tatsunori Nakagawa; Reiji Takahashi
Journal:  Microbes Environ       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 3.  Ecological perspectives on microbes involved in N-cycling.

Authors:  Kazuo Isobe; Nobuhito Ohte
Journal:  Microbes Environ       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Effects of Turning Frequency on Ammonia Emission during the Composting of Chicken Manure and Soybean Straw.

Authors:  Qianqian Ma; Yanli Li; Jianming Xue; Dengmiao Cheng; Zhaojun Li
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 4.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.