| Literature DB >> 22972385 |
Shota Oku1, Ayaka Komatsu, Takahisa Tajima, Yutaka Nakashimada, Junichi Kato.
Abstract
Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf0-1 showed positive chemotactic responses toward 20 commonly-occurring l-amino acids. Genomic analysis revealed that P. fluorescens Pf0-1 possesses three genes (Pfl01_0124, Pfl01_0354, and Pfl01_4431) homologous to the Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 pctA gene, which has been identified as a chemotaxis sensory protein for amino acids. When Pf01_4431, Pfl01_0124, and Pfl01_0354 were introduced into the pctA pctB pctC triple mutant of P. aeruginosa PAO1, a mutant defective in chemotaxis to amino acids, its transformants showed chemotactic responses to 18, 16, and one amino acid, respectively. This result suggests that Pf01_4431, Pfl01_0124, and Pfl01_0354 are chemotaxis sensory proteins for amino acids and their genes were designated ctaA, ctaB, and ctaC, respectively. The ctaA ctaB ctaC triple mutant of P. fluorescens Pf0-1 showed only weak responses to Cys and Pro but no responses to the other 18 amino acids, indicating that CtaA, CtaB, and CtaC are major chemotaxis sensory proteins in P. fluorescens Pf0-1. Tomato root colonization by P. fluorescens strains was analyzed by gnotobiotic competitive root colonization assay. It was found that ctaA ctaB ctaC mutant was less competitive than the wild-type strain, suggesting that chemotaxis to amino acids, major components of root exudate, has an important role in root colonization by P. fluorescens Pf0-1. The ctaA ctaB ctaC triple mutant was more competitive than the cheA mutant of P. fluorescens Pf0-1, which is non-chemotactic, but motile. This result suggests that chemoattractants other than amino acids are also involved in root colonization by P. fluorescens Pf0-1.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22972385 PMCID: PMC4103555 DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.me12005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbes Environ ISSN: 1342-6311 Impact factor: 2.912
Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study
| Strain or plasmid | Relevant characteristics | Reference or source | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pf0-1 | wild-type strain | ||
| FL0124 | Pf0-1 derivative, Δ | Δ | This study |
| FL0354 | Pf0-1 derivative, Δ | Δ | This study |
| FL4431 | Pf0-1 derivative, Δ | Δ | This study |
| FLD3 | Pf0-1 derivative, Δ | Δ | This study |
| Pf0-1Δ | Pf0-1 derivative, Δ | This study | |
| Pf01Rif | Pf0-1 derivative, spontaneous rifampicin-resistant mutant | This study | |
| FLD3Rif | FLD3 derivative, spontaneous rifampicin-resistant mutant, Δ | This study | |
| PAO1 | wild-type strain | ||
| PCT2 | PAO1 derivative, Δ | ||
| JM109 | |||
| S17-1 | MM294 derivative, RP4-2 Tc::Mu-Km::Tn | ||
| Plasmids | |||
| pUCP18 | |||
| pFLCP01 | pUCP18 with a 2.2 kb PCR fragment containing | This study | |
| pFLCP02 | pUCP18 with a 2.1 kb PCR fragment containing | This study | |
| pFLCP03 | pUCP18 with a 2.2 kb PCR fragment containing | This study | |
| pK18 | Kmr pUC18 derivative, | ||
| pUGMF01 | pK19 | This study | |
| pUGMF02 | pK19 | This study | |
| pUGMF03 | pK19 | This study | |
Cbr, carbenicillin resistance; Kmr, kanamycin resistance.
Sequence of PCR primers used in this study
| Primer name | Sequence (5′ to 3′) |
|---|---|
| PFL01f | ACGTAGAATTCGAATCTGCCAGAAATGCCGTCC |
| PFL01r | ACGTAGGATCCGATGGGCAATGTGCTGAAGCTG |
| PFL02f | ACGTACTGCAGCCGAGGTGTTTGGTCGTGATAC |
| PFL02r | ACGTAGGATCCGTGGCGGTCGAAATAACAGCAG |
| PFL03f | ACGTAGGATCCAGCTAAAGGTGACAGATGCGAC |
| PFL03r | ACGTACTGCAGGCGTTGATCTCCCTTGGTTGAC |
| DPFL01Uf | ACGTACTGCAGGTAATCGAGATCCACGCTGCTG |
| DPFL01Ur | ACGTAGGATCCTCTGACGGCTGCTCTACTTTGG |
| DPFL01Df | ACGTAGGATCCGCTTCAAGATCTGATCGCTTG |
| DPFL01Dr | ACGTAGAATTCGATCTACATCCGCAACGGCTAC |
| DPFL02Uf | ACGTAGTCGACTGCGCTGCTGTTATTTCGAC |
| DPFL02Ur | ACGTAGGATCCATGGCAACGATCCGTATCTG |
| DPFL02Df | ACGTAGCATGCGAACGAATACCTGAGCCAGAAC |
| DPFL02Dr | ACGTAGTCGACACCTTCAGGTCGATGTATCACG |
| DPFL03Uf | ACGTAAAGCTTTTGTCATAACGGCCCTTGAACG |
| DPFL03Ur | ACGTACTCGAGCAGTCGCATCTGTCACCTTTAG |
| DPFL03Df | ACGTACTCGAGTCCGACGAAGACGACCAACATC |
| DPFL03Dr | ACGTAGAATTCCGCTCGTGAGATTCAGCCATTG |
| DcheAUf | AGATCTGCAGTGACGCTAAAGATCACGAAGTTGC |
| DcheAUr | ACTAGAATTCGTTCGGACAGTTGCTCAAGAATCTC |
| DcheADf | CATAGAATTCGTCAGGAAGAAGTGGTCATCAAGC |
| DcheADr | GCATTCTAGACGATAAGGCTTAGAACATCCATCAG |
Chemotactic responses of P. fluorescens Pf0-1 wild-type and mutant strains toward amino acids
| Compounds | Chemotactic responses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Pf0-1 | FL0124 (Δ | FL0354 (Δ | FL4431 (Δ | FLD3 (Δ | |
| Ala | ++ | + | − | + | − |
| Arg | ++ | +++ | + | ++ | − |
| Asn | ++ | ++ | − | +++ | − |
| Asp | ++ | − | − | − | − |
| Cys | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | ++ |
| Gln | +++ | ++ | − | − | − |
| Glu | + | ++ | − | − | − |
| Gly | +++ | ++ | + | + | − |
| His | ++ | +++ | − | ++ | − |
| Ile | +++ | +++ | − | +++ | − |
| Leu | ++ | − | − | +++ | − |
| Lys | +++ | ++ | − | ++ | − |
| Met | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | − |
| Phe | +++ | ++ | − | ++ | − |
| Pro | +++ | ++ | ++ | +++ | ++ |
| Ser | +++ | ++ | − | +++ | − |
| Thr | ++ | +++ | + | +++ | − |
| Trp | + | − | − | − | − |
| Tyr | ++ | + | − | + | − |
| Val | ++ | +++ | − | +++ | − |
Videotape frames were analyzed at the initiation of observation and 1 min after the initiation. Normalized cell numbers were calculated by dividing the number of bacteria at 1 min by that at the initiation of the observation. The strength of chemotaxis is presented as the normalized cell number: +++ >3; ++ ≤3–>2; + ≤2–>1.5; −, no response.
Chemotactic responses of P. aeruginosa PCT2 containing P. fluorescens Pf0-1 ctaA, ctaB, or ctaC genes toward amino acids
| Compounds | Chemotactic responses | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| PCT2 (pFLCP01) (+ | PCT2 (pFLCP02) (+ | PCT2 (pFLCP03) (+ | |
| Ala | +++ | − | +++ |
| Arg | + | − | +++ |
| Asn | +++ | − | + |
| Asp | ++ | − | ++ |
| Cys | − | − | +++ |
| Gln | ++ | − | − |
| Glu | + | − | − |
| Gly | + | − | +++ |
| His | − | − | +++ |
| Ile | − | − | +++ |
| Leu | ++ | − | +++ |
| Lys | +++ | − | +++ |
| Met | +++ | ++ | +++ |
| Phe | + | − | ++ |
| Pro | + | − | +++ |
| Ser | +++ | − | +++ |
| Thr | + | − | +++ |
| Trp | − | − | +++ |
| Tyr | + | − | ++ |
| Val | ++ | − | +++ |
Chemotactic responses are the same as in Table 3.
Fig. 1Representation of 20 commonly-occurring l-amino acids detected by chemotaxis sensory proteins. This Venn diagram is constructed based on chemotactic responses by FL0124, FL0354, and FL4431 (Table 3).
Fig. 2Chemotactic responses to tomato root exudate by P. fluorescens Pf0-1 (closed circles), FL0124 (open circles), FL0354 (open squares), FL4431 (closed squares), and FLD3 (open triangles). Digital image processing was used to count the number of bacteria around the mouth of a capillary containing exudates and 1% (w/v) agarose. One videotape frame was analyzed at each time point. The chemotactic response is presented as the normalized cell number. The normalized cell number was calculated by dividing the number of bacteria at each time point by that at the initiation of the observation. Vertical bars represent the standard deviations of measurements done in triplicate experiments.
Fig. 3Tomato root tip colonization by P. fluorescens strains, (A) alone and (B) in competition with Rif r mutants. After 7 days, root systems were sampled. Bar indicates standard deviation. The total CFU numbers at the root tip in Fig. 3B were the same level as in Fig. 3A. There were significant (P<0.05) differences in colonization between Pf0-1Rif and ΔcheA, Pf0-1Rif and FLD3, FLD3Rif and ΔcheA, FLD3Rif and Pf0-1, and FLD3Rif and FL0124.