Literature DB >> 22972031

How do patients' preferences compare to the present spectrum of diabetes research?

S Arnolds1, S Heckermann, C Koch, N Heissmann, P T Sawicki.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare patients' preferences in diabetes research to the current scientific research spectrum as presented during annual meetings of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).
METHODS: After dividing all scientific activities in diabetes research into 9 main fields, a questionnaire was published in a popular German weekly news magazine, inviting diabetic patients to express their research preferences. Thereafter, all abstracts accepted for publication at 2 recent EASD meetings were allocated to one of these research fields.
RESULTS: In May and July 2011 the questionnaire was answered by 652 patients with diabetes, 205 relatives and 61 other persons interested. The most important research fields were "development, pathophysiology and prevention of diabetes" (25.6%), "transplantation and cell therapy" (19.4%) and "blood glucose measurement and artificial pancreas" (16.5%). The most often covered topic of the 2,645 EASD abstracts was "development, pathophysiology and prevention" (46.3%), followed by "diabetes complications in man" (17.5%) and "special situations, training, psychology, treatment- and care structures" (10.5%).
CONCLUSION: Views of diabetic patients and their relatives regarding their preferred research fields may differ when compared to current scientific activity in diabetology. Diabetic patients and their relatives should be involved in the weighting and selection of research topics more often. © J. A. Barth Verlag in Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22972031     DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1323776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes        ISSN: 0947-7349            Impact factor:   2.949


  3 in total

1.  An Innovative Approach to Informing Research: Gathering Perspectives on Diabetes Care Challenges From an Online Patient Community.

Authors:  Emily B Schroeder; Jay Desai; Julie A Schmittdiel; Andrea R Paolino; Jennifer L Schneider; Glenn K Goodrich; Jean M Lawrence; Katherine M Newton; Gregory A Nichols; Patrick J O'Connor; Marcy Fitz-Randolph; John F Steiner
Journal:  Interact J Med Res       Date:  2015-06-30

2.  Quantified patient preferences for lifestyle intervention programs for diabetes prevention-a protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Charalabos-Markos Dintsios; Nadja Chernyak; Benjamin Grehl; Andrea Icks
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2018-11-29

3.  Does funded research reflect the priorities of people living with type 1 diabetes? A secondary analysis of research questions.

Authors:  Kate Boddy; Katherine Cowan; Andy Gibson; Nicky Britten
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.