Literature DB >> 22971590

Association between intensive care unit-acquired dysglycemia and in-hospital mortality.

Omar Badawi1, Michael D Waite, Steven A Fuhrman, Ilene H Zuckerman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to quantify the association between intensive care unit-acquired dysglycemia (hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and high variability) and in-hospital mortality.
DESIGN: Retrospective, observational study.
SETTING: eICU Research Institute participating hospitals with an active tele-ICU program between January 1, 2008, and September 30, 2010, representing 784,392 adult intensive care unit patients. PATIENTS: A total of 194,772 patients met inclusion criteria with an intensive care unit length of stay >48 hrs.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV standardized mortality ratios were calculated for dysglycemia present at admission and acquired in the intensive care unit. Intensive care unit-acquired dysglycemia was modeled using multivariable modified Poisson regression to account for confounding not incorporated in Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation. Dysglycemia severity was assessed by the relative risk of in-hospital mortality associated with the maximum, time-weighted average daily glucose; lowest glucose value throughout the intensive care unit stay; and quintiles of variability (coefficient of variation). The association of duration beyond thresholds of dysglycemia on mortality was also modeled. The adjusted relative risk (95% confidence interval) of mortality for the maximum intensive care unit average daily glucose was 1.13 (1.04-1.58), 1.43 (1.30-1.58), 1.63 (1.47-1.81), 1.76 (1.55-1.99), and 1.89 (1.62-2.19) for 110-150 mg/dL, 151-180 mg/dL, 180-240 mg/dL, 240-300 mg/dL, and >300 mg/dL, respectively, compared to patients whose highest average daily glucose was 80-110 mg/dL. The relative risk of mortality for the lowest glucose value was 1.67 (1.37-2.03), 1.53 (1.37-1.70), 1.12 (1.04-1.21), and 1.06 (1.01-1.11) for <20 mg/dL, 20-40 mg/dL, 40-60 mg/dL, and 60-80 mg/dL, respectively, compared to patients whose lowest value was 80-110 mg/dL. The relative risk of mortality increased with greater duration of hyperglycemia and with increased variability. The relative risk for the highest compared to lowest quintile of variability was 1.61 (1.47-1.78). The association of duration of hyperglycemia on mortality was more pronounced with more severe hyperglycemia.
CONCLUSIONS: The risk of mortality progressively increased with severity and duration of deviation from euglycemia and with increased variability. These data suggest that severe intensive care unit-acquired hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and variability are associated with similar risks of mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22971590     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182656ae5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  36 in total

1.  Comparison of subcutaneous and intravenous continuous glucose monitoring accuracy in an operating room and an intensive care unit.

Authors:  Masaya Munekage; Tomoaki Yatabe; Masahiko Sakaguchi; Hiroyuki Kitagawa; Takahiko Tamura; Tsutomu Namikawa; Kazuhiro Hanazaki
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 2.  Energy, Protein, Carbohydrate, and Lipid Intakes and Their Effects on Morbidity and Mortality in Critically Ill Adult Patients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Anna Patkova; Vera Joskova; Eduard Havel; Miroslav Kovarik; Monika Kucharova; Zdenek Zadak; Miloslav Hronek
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 8.701

3.  Accuracy of subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring in critically ill adults: improved sensor performance with enhanced calibrations.

Authors:  Lalantha Leelarathna; Shane W English; Hood Thabit; Karen Caldwell; Janet M Allen; Kavita Kumareswaran; Malgorzata E Wilinska; Marianna Nodale; Ahmad Haidar; Mark L Evans; Rowan Burnstein; Roman Hovorka
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 6.118

4.  Transition From Intravenous to Subcutaneous Insulin in Critically Ill Adults.

Authors:  Meagan K Doolin; Todd A Walroth; Serena A Harris; Jessica A Whitten; Andrew C Fritschle-Hilliard
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-06-28

5.  Association of preoperative glucose concentration with myocardial injury and death after non-cardiac surgery (GlucoVISION): a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Zubin Punthakee; Pilar Paniagua Iglesias; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Ignasi Gich; Inmaculada India; Germán Malaga; Ruben Diaz Jover; Hertzel C Gerstein; P J Devereaux
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 32.069

6.  Treatment thresholds for hyperglycemia in critically ill patients with and without diabetes.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Moritoki Egi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Glycemic control: please agree to disagree.

Authors:  Jean-Charles Preiser; Heleen M Oudemans-van Straaten
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 8.  Reporting on Glucose Control Metrics in the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Tironi Rafael Machado; Preiser Jean-Charles
Journal:  Eur Endocrinol       Date:  2015-08-19

Review 9.  [Shock liver and cholestatic liver in critically ill patients].

Authors:  A Drolz; T Horvatits; K Roedl; V Fuhrmann
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 10.  Updates in Glycemic Management in the Hospital.

Authors:  Wasineenart Mongkolpun; Bruna Provenzano; Jean-Charles Preiser
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 4.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.