Literature DB >> 22971570

Serum testosterone quantitation by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: interference from blood collection tubes.

Run Zhang Shi1, Huub H van Rossum, Raffick A R Bowen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: During the development of a testosterone assay by LC-MS/MS, we encountered significant assay interference introduced by blood collection tubes. We examined a number of commonly used blood collection tubes for the presence of interference and its impact on testosterone quantitation. DESIGN AND METHODS: A number of commonly used blood collection tubes were examined by incubation of zero, low and high testosterone concentration samples with them over time, followed by sample preparation using liquid-liquid extraction and analysis by LC-MS/MS. Source of interference was identified by separately incubating blood collection tube coating, stopper and separator gel in clean glass tubes containing zero calibrator.
RESULTS: Significant interference was found in some blood collection tubes, with the separator gel identified as the main source. The magnitude of the interference increases over time and mainly affected one of the two testosterone mass transitions used in the quantitation, making it readily detected by the discrepant results obtained by each of the two testosterone mass transitions. We were unable to eliminate the interference by adjustment of the sample preparation procedure, and by changing LC or MS parameters. Accurate quantitation of testosterone is possible when the problematic tubes are avoided, and blood collection tubes free of interference are used instead.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant LC-MS/MS testosterone assay interference that originated from certain type of blood collection tubes hampered testosterone analysis. Examination of blood collection tube and any other laboratory test tubes for interference should therefore be an integral part of the development and validation of any LC-MS/MS assay used in a clinical diagnostic laboratory.
Copyright © 2012 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22971570     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0009-9120            Impact factor:   3.281


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of four clinically validated testosterone LC-MS/MS assays: Harmonization is an attainable goal.

Authors:  Deborah French; Julia Drees; Judith A Stone; Daniel T Holmes; J Grace van der Gugten
Journal:  Clin Mass Spectrom       Date:  2018-12-01

2.  Using mass spectrometry to overcome the longstanding inaccuracy of a commercially-available clinical testosterone immunoassay.

Authors:  Junyan Shi; Rachel Bird; Michael W Schmeling; Andrew N Hoofnagle
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 3.318

3.  Revisiting hyper- and hypo-androgenism by tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Flaminia Fanelli; Alessandra Gambineri; Marco Mezzullo; Valentina Vicennati; Carla Pelusi; Renato Pasquali; Uberto Pagotto
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.514

4.  Total testosterone quantitative measurement in serum by LC-MS/MS.

Authors:  Yuesong Wang; Gabrielle D Gay; Julianne Cook Botelho; Samuel P Caudill; Hubert W Vesper
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 3.786

5.  Multiplexed analysis of steroid hormones in human serum using novel microflow tile technology and LC-MS/MS.

Authors:  Carolyn J Broccardo; Kevin L Schauer; Wendy M Kohrt; Robert S Schwartz; James P Murphy; Jessica E Prenni
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.205

6.  Changes to serum sample tube and processing methodology does not cause Intra-Individual [corrected] variation in automated whole serum N-glycan profiling in health and disease.

Authors:  Nicholas T Ventham; Richard A Gardner; Nicholas A Kennedy; Archana Shubhakar; Rahul Kalla; Elaine R Nimmo; Daryl L Fernandes; Jack Satsangi; Daniel I R Spencer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Improving Science by Overcoming Laboratory Pitfalls With Hormone Measurements.

Authors:  Jacquelien J Hillebrand; Wjera V Wickenhagen; Annemieke C Heijboer
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  A comparative study on the effect of blood collection tubes on stress oxidative markers.

Authors:  Alireza Bastin; Saba Fooladi; Amir Hossein Doustimotlagh; Sina Vakili; Amir Hashem Aminizadeh; Sanaz Faramarz; Hamidreza Shiri; Mohammad Hadi Nematollahi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Interferences from blood collection tube components on clinical chemistry assays.

Authors:  Raffick A R Bowen; Alan T Remaley
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 2.313

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.