M N Essex1, P Bhadra, G H Sands. 1. Pfizer Inc., 235 East 42nd Street, New York, NY 10017, USA. margaret.essex@pfizer.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of celecoxib versus naproxen in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. METHODS: This 6-month, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial was conducted at 47 centres in the USA. Patients with OA of the knee were randomized to receive 200 mg celecoxib orally once daily or 500 mg naproxen orally twice daily. The primary endpoint was defined as a 20% improvement from baseline to 6 months in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) OA total score. RESULTS:A total of 586 out of 589 randomized patients received at least one dose ofcelecoxib (n=294) or naproxen (n=292). The primary endpoint (6-month response rate) was achieved by 52.7% and 49.7% of patients in the celecoxib and naproxen treatment groups, respectively. Significantly fewer discontinuations due to gastrointestinal adverse events occurred in patients receiving celecoxib than in those receiving naproxen (4.1% versus 15.1%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Over the 6month study period, celecoxib provided similar improvements in OA symptoms to naproxen. In addition, celecoxib provided better upper gastrointestinal tolerability than naproxen.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of celecoxib versus naproxen in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. METHODS: This 6-month, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial was conducted at 47 centres in the USA. Patients with OA of the knee were randomized to receive 200 mg celecoxib orally once daily or 500 mg naproxen orally twice daily. The primary endpoint was defined as a 20% improvement from baseline to 6 months in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) OA total score. RESULTS: A total of 586 out of 589 randomized patients received at least one dose of celecoxib (n=294) or naproxen (n=292). The primary endpoint (6-month response rate) was achieved by 52.7% and 49.7% of patients in the celecoxib and naproxen treatment groups, respectively. Significantly fewer discontinuations due to gastrointestinal adverse events occurred in patients receiving celecoxib than in those receiving naproxen (4.1% versus 15.1%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Over the 6month study period, celecoxib provided similar improvements in OA symptoms to naproxen. In addition, celecoxib provided better upper gastrointestinal tolerability than naproxen.
Authors: Bahram H Arjmandi; Lauren T Ormsbee; Marcus L Elam; Sara C Campbell; Nader Rahnama; Mark E Payton; Ken Brummel-Smith; Bruce P Daggy Journal: J Med Food Date: 2014-03-10 Impact factor: 2.786
Authors: E Losina; I M Usiskin; S R Smith; J K Sullivan; K C Smith; D J Hunter; S P Messier; A D Paltiel; J N Katz Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2018-03-02 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Michael DeRogatis; Hiba K Anis; Nipun Sodhi; Joseph O Ehiorobo; Morad Chughtai; Anil Bhave; Michael A Mont Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2019-10
Authors: Ahmed Shelbaya; Caitlyn T Solem; Chris Walker; Yin Wan; Courtney Johnson; Joseph C Cappelleri Journal: Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Date: 2018-04-06
Authors: David Charles Baranowski; Beth Buchanan; Heather C Dwyer; Joseph P Gabriele; Stephanie Kelly; Joseph A Araujo Journal: J Pain Res Date: 2018-11-13 Impact factor: 3.133
Authors: Courtney Johnson; Jennifer Stephens; Christopher Walker; Joseph C Cappelleri; Ahmed Shelbaya Journal: Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Date: 2020-01-21