Literature DB >> 22971206

Dosing frequency and medication adherence in chronic disease.

Craig I Coleman1, Brendan Limone, Diana M Sobieraj, Soyon Lee, Matthew S Roberts, Rajbir Kaur, Tawfikul Alam.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prior research has shown a decrease in medication adherence as dosing frequency increases; however, meta-analyses have not been able to demonstrate a significant inverse relationship between dosing frequency and adherence when comparing twice-daily versus once-daily dosing.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of scheduled dosing frequency on medication adherence in patients with chronic diseases.
METHODS: A systematic literature search of Medline and Embase from January 1986 to December 2011 and a hand search of references were performed to identify eligible studies. Randomized and observational studies were included if they utilized a prospective design, assessed adult patients with chronic diseases, evaluated scheduled oral medications taken 1 to 4 times daily, and measured medication adherence for at least 1 month using an electronic monitoring device. Manual searches of reference sections of identified studies and systematic reviews were also performed to find other potentially relevant articles. Standard definitions for medication taking, regimen, and timing adherence were used and evaluated. Studies were pooled using a multivariate linear mixed-model method to conduct meta-regression accounting for both random and fixed effects, weighted by the inverse of the variance of medication adherence.
RESULTS: Fifty-one studies, comprising 65, 76, and 47 dosing frequency arms for the taking, regimen, and timing adherence endpoints were included. Unadjusted adherence estimates were highest when the least stringent definition, taking adherence, was used (range for dosing frequencies: 80.1%-93.0%) and lowest when the most stringent definition, timing adherence, was used (range for dosing frequencies: 18.8%-76.9%). In multivariate meta-regression analyses, the adjusted weighted mean percentage adherence rates for all regimens dosed more frequently than once per day were significantly lower compared with once-daily regimens (for 2-times, 3-times, and 4-times daily regimens, respectively: differences for taking adherence: -6.7%, -13.5%, and -19.2%; regimen adherence: -13.1%, -24.9%, and -23.1%; and timing adherence: -26.7%, -39.0%, and -54.2%).
CONCLUSION: Patients with chronic diseases appear to be more adherent with once-daily compared with more frequently scheduled medication regimens. The use of more stringent definitions of adherence magnified these findings.
Copyright © 2012, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22971206     DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.7.527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm        ISSN: 1083-4087


  122 in total

Review 1.  Changing the pill: developments toward the promise of an ultra-long-acting gastroretentive dosage form.

Authors:  David H Altreuter; Ameya R Kirtane; Tyler Grant; Cecilia Kruger; Giovanni Traverso; Andrew M Bellinger
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 6.648

2.  Depressive symptoms moderate the relationship between medication regimen complexity and objectively measured medication adherence in adults with heart failure.

Authors:  Carly M Goldstein; Emily C Gathright; John Gunstad; Mary A Dolansky; Joseph D Redle; Richard Josephson; Shirley M Moore; Joel W Hughes
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2017-02-11

Review 3.  AGA Technical Review on the Management of Mild-to-Moderate Ulcerative Colitis.

Authors:  Siddharth Singh; Joseph D Feuerstein; David G Binion; William J Tremaine
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 4.  AGA Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Mild-to-Moderate Ulcerative Colitis.

Authors:  Cynthia W Ko; Siddharth Singh; Joseph D Feuerstein; Corinna Falck-Ytter; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Raymond K Cross
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 5.  Fluticasone furoate/vilanterol: a review of its use in patients with asthma.

Authors:  Yahiya Y Syed
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Concerns about the use of new oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Claudia Stöllberger; Josef Finsterer
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 7.  Survivorship after allogeneic transplantation-management recommendations for the primary care provider.

Authors:  André Tichelli; Alicia Rovó
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.952

8.  Primary non-adherence in Portugal: findings and implications.

Authors:  Filipa Alves da Costa; Ana Rita Pedro; Inês Teixeira; Fátima Bragança; José Aranda da Silva; José Cabrita
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2015-04-02

Review 9.  Application of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Product Life Cycle Management. A Case Study with a Carbidopa-Levodopa Extended-Release Formulation.

Authors:  Nishit B Modi
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 10.  Cost-Effectiveness and Challenges of Implementing Intensive Blood Pressure Goals and Team-Based Care.

Authors:  Catherine G Derington; Jordan B King; Kelsey B Bryant; Blake T McGee; Andrew E Moran; William S Weintraub; Brandon K Bellows; Adam P Bress
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 5.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.