Zhi-Qing Li1, Kai Liu, Ji-Cheng Duan, Zhe Li, Chang-Qing Su, Jia-He Yang. 1. Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou City, Jiangsu ProvinceDepartments of Hepatic Surgery Molecular Oncology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
AIM: There is no clear consensus on the optimal timing of surgical resection for synchronous colorectal liver metastases (SCLM). This study is a meta-analysis of the available evidence. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of trials comparing outcomes following simultaneous resection with staged resection for SCLM published from 1990 to 2010 in PubMed, Embase, Ovid and Medline. Pooled odds ratios (OR) or weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using either the fixed effects or random effects model. RESULTS: Nineteen non-randomized controlled trials (NRCT) studies were included in this analysis. These studies included a total of 2724 patients: 1116 underwent simultaneous resection and 1608 underwent staged resection. Meta-analysis showed that shorter hospital stay (P < 0.001) and lower total complication rate (P < 0.001) were observed in patients undergoing simultaneous resection group. The overall survival rate in the simultaneous resection group did not statistically differ with that in the staged resection group at 1 year (P = 0.13), 3 years (P = 0.26), 5 years (P = 0.38), as well as the 1, 3 and 5 years disease-free survival rates (respectively, P = 0.55; P = 0.16; P = 0.12). No significant difference was noted between the two groups in terms of mortality (P = 0.16), intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.06) and recurrence (P = 0.47). CONCLUSION: Simultaneous resection is safe and efficient in the treatment of patients with SCLM while avoiding a second laparotomy. In selected patients, simultaneous resection might be considered as the preferred approach. However, the findings have to be carefully interpreted due to the lower level of evidence and the existence of heterogeneity.
AIM: There is no clear consensus on the optimal timing of surgical resection for synchronous colorectal liver metastases (SCLM). This study is a meta-analysis of the available evidence. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of trials comparing outcomes following simultaneous resection with staged resection for SCLM published from 1990 to 2010 in PubMed, Embase, Ovid and Medline. Pooled odds ratios (OR) or weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using either the fixed effects or random effects model. RESULTS: Nineteen non-randomized controlled trials (NRCT) studies were included in this analysis. These studies included a total of 2724 patients: 1116 underwent simultaneous resection and 1608 underwent staged resection. Meta-analysis showed that shorter hospital stay (P < 0.001) and lower total complication rate (P < 0.001) were observed in patients undergoing simultaneous resection group. The overall survival rate in the simultaneous resection group did not statistically differ with that in the staged resection group at 1 year (P = 0.13), 3 years (P = 0.26), 5 years (P = 0.38), as well as the 1, 3 and 5 years disease-free survival rates (respectively, P = 0.55; P = 0.16; P = 0.12). No significant difference was noted between the two groups in terms of mortality (P = 0.16), intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.06) and recurrence (P = 0.47). CONCLUSION: Simultaneous resection is safe and efficient in the treatment of patients with SCLM while avoiding a second laparotomy. In selected patients, simultaneous resection might be considered as the preferred approach. However, the findings have to be carefully interpreted due to the lower level of evidence and the existence of heterogeneity.
Authors: Gerd R Silberhumer; Philip B Paty; Brian Denton; Jose Guillem; Mithat Gonen; Raphael L C Araujo; Garret M Nash; Larissa K Temple; Peter J Allen; Ronald P DeMatteo; Martin R Weiser; W Douglas Wong; William R Jarnagin; Michael I D'Angelica; Yuman Fong Journal: Surgery Date: 2016-04-11 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Héber Salvador de Castro Ribeiro; Orlando Jorge Martins Torres; Márcio Carmona Marques; Paulo Herman; Antonio Nocchi Kalil; Eduardo de Souza Martins Fernandes; Fábio Ferreira de Oliveira; Leonaldson Dos Santos Castro; Rodrigo Hanriot; Suilane Coelho Ribeiro Oliveira; Marcio Fernando Boff; Wilson Luiz da Costa; Roberto de Almeida Gil; Tulio Eduardo Flesch Pfiffer; Fabio Ferrari Makdissi; Manoel de Souza Rocha; Paulo Cezar Galvão do Amaral; Leonardo Atem Gonçalves de Araújo Costa; Tomas A Aloia Journal: Arq Bras Cir Dig Date: 2016-03
Authors: Emilio De Raffele; Mariateresa Mirarchi; Dajana Cuicchi; Ferdinando Lecce; Claudio Ricci; Riccardo Casadei; Bruno Cola; Francesco Minni Journal: World J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2018-10-15