Literature DB >> 2297100

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of epidural ropivacaine in humans.

J A Katz1, P O Bridenbaugh, D C Knarr, S H Helton, D D Denson.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to characterize the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of three concentrations of the new long-acting amide local anesthetic, ropivacaine, given epidurally in 15 physical status ASA I or II patients for elective lower-extremity orthopedic procedures using a nonrandomized open-label design. Three groups of five patients each received either 0.5%, 0.75%, or 1.0% ropivacaine. Upper and lower levels of analgesia to pinprick were determined at frequent intervals until normal sensation had completely returned. Motor blockade was assessed by use of a modified Bromage scale after each determination of level of analgesia. Fifteen venous blood samples were collected over 12 h after ropivacaine injection. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived using serum concentration-time data. No significant differences were found between the three groups in terms of onset or recovery of motor and sensory blockade. Median maximum thoracic levels of analgesia achieved were 8, 6, and 5 for the 0.5%, 0.75%, and 1.0% groups, respectively, and occurred at 29 +/- 11, 37 +/- 21, and 30 +/- 9 min. Respective times to two-segment regression were 2.8 +/- 1.0, 3.0 +/- 0.5, and 2.9 +/- 0.6 h. Total durations of sensory blockade were 5.4 +/- 0.7, 6.5 +/- 0.4, and 6.8 +/- 0.8 h, respectively. No statistically significant differences were noted between the three groups in terms of clearance (CL). The mean residence time (MRT) was significantly longer for the 0.5% group when compared with the 1% group. The peak concentration (Cmax) for the 0.5% group was found to be significantly lower than for either the 0.75% or 1% groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2297100     DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199001000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  14 in total

1.  Flip-flop kinetics of ropivacaine during continuous epidural infusion influences its accumulation rate.

Authors:  Maria Cusato; Massimo Allegri; Tekla Niebel; Pablo Ingelmo; Monica Broglia; Antonio Braschi; Mario Regazzi
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Preincisional and intraperitoneal ropivacaine plus normal saline infusion for postoperative pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized double-blind controlled trial.

Authors:  George Pappas-Gogos; Konstandinos E Tsimogiannis; Nicolaos Zikos; Konstantinos Nikas; Adamantia Manataki; Evangelos C Tsimoyiannis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Bupivacaine 0.1% does not improve post-operative epidural fentanyl analgesia after abdominal or thoracic surgery.

Authors:  N H Badner; W E Komar
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 4.  Recent advances in the pharmacokinetics of local anaesthetics. Long-acting amide enantiomers and continuous infusions.

Authors:  J M Thomas; S A Schug
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Preemptive multimodal analgesia facilitates same-day discharge following robot-assisted hysterectomy.

Authors:  Thomas M Shultz
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-05-28

6.  Preincisional local infiltration of levobupivacaine vs ropivacaine for pain control after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P Papagiannopoulou; H Argiriadou; M Georgiou; B Papaziogas; E Sfyra; F Kanakoudis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Bupivacaine 0.125% improves continuous postoperative epidural fentanyl analgesia after abdominal or thoracic surgery.

Authors:  N H Badner; R Bhandari; W E Komar
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 8.  Adverse effects of local anaesthetics.

Authors:  W McCaughey
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  Patient Controlled Epidural Labour Analgesia (PCEA): A Comparison Between Ropivacaine, Ropivacaine-Fentanyl and Ropivacaine-Clonidine.

Authors:  Arun Ahirwar; Ravi Prakash; Brij Bihari Kushwaha; Amrita Gaurav; Ajay Kumar Chaudhary; Reetu Verma; Dinesh Singh; Vineeta Singh
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-08-20

Review 10.  High-Impact Clinical Studies That Fomented New Developments in Anesthesia: History of Achievements, 1966-2015.

Authors:  Igor Kissin
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.