Literature DB >> 22970908

Uptake and transfection with polymeric nanoparticles are dependent on polymer end-group structure, but largely independent of nanoparticle physical and chemical properties.

Joel C Sunshine1, Daniel Y Peng, Jordan J Green.   

Abstract

Development of nonviral particles for gene delivery requires a greater understanding of the properties that enable gene delivery particles to overcome the numerous barriers to intracellular DNA delivery. Linear poly(beta-amino) esters (PBAE) have shown substantial promise for gene delivery, but the mechanism behind their effectiveness is not well quantified with respect to these barriers. In this study, we synthesized, characterized, and evaluated for gene delivery an array of linear PBAEs that differed by small changes along the backbone, side chain, and end group of the polymers. We examined particle size and surface charge, polymer molecular weight, polymer degradation rate, buffering capacity, cellular uptake, transfection, and cytotoxicity of nanoparticles formulated with these polymers. Significantly, this is the first study that has quantified how small differential structural changes to polymers of this class modulate buffering capacity and polymer degradation rate and relates these findings to gene delivery efficacy. All polymers formed positively charged (zeta potential 21-29 mV) nanosized particles (∼150 nm). The polymers hydrolytically degraded quickly in physiological conditions, with half-lives ranging from 90 min to 6 h depending on polymer structure. The PBAE buffering capacities in the relevant pH range (pH 5.1-7.4) varied from 34% to 95% protonatable amines, and on a per mass basis, PBAEs buffered 1.4-4.6 mmol of H(+)/g. When compared to 25 kDa branched polyethyleneimine (PEI), PBAEs buffer significantly fewer protons/mass, as PEI buffers 6.2 mmol of H(+)/g over the same range. However, due to the relatively low cytotoxicity of PBAEs, higher polymer mass can be used to form particles than with PEI and total buffering capacity of PBAE-based particles significantly exceeds that of PEI. Uptake into COS-7 cells ranged from 0% to 95% of cells and transfection ranged from 0% to 93% of cells, depending on the base polymer structure and the end modifications examined. Five polymers achieved higher uptake and transfection efficacy with less toxicity than branched-PEI control. Surprisingly, acrylate-terminated base polymers were dramatically less efficacious than their end-capped versions, in terms of both uptake (1-3% for acrylate, 75-94% for end-capped) and transfection efficacy (0-1% vs 20-89%), even though there are minimal differences between acrylate and end-capped polymers in terms of DNA retardation in gel electrophoresis, particle size, zeta potential, and cytotoxicity. These studies further elucidate the role of polymer structure for gene delivery and highlight that small molecule end-group modification of a linear polymer can be critical for cellular uptake in a manner that is largely independent of polymer/DNA binding, particle size, and particle surface charge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22970908      PMCID: PMC3779641          DOI: 10.1021/mp3004176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharm        ISSN: 1543-8384            Impact factor:   4.939


  41 in total

1.  Gene therapy put on hold as third child develops cancer.

Authors:  Erika Check
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-02-10       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Gene delivery: a single nuclear localization signal peptide is sufficient to carry DNA to the cell nucleus.

Authors:  M A Zanta; P Belguise-Valladier; J P Behr
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-01-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The relationship between terminal functionalization and molecular weight of a gene delivery polymer and transfection efficacy in mammary epithelial 2-D cultures and 3-D organotypic cultures.

Authors:  Nupura S Bhise; Ryan S Gray; Joel C Sunshine; Soe Htet; Andrew J Ewald; Jordan J Green
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 4.  Poly(glycoamidoamine)s: a broad class of carbohydrate-containing polycations for nucleic acid delivery.

Authors:  Nilesh P Ingle; Brett Malone; Theresa M Reineke
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 19.536

5.  2011 Rita Schaffer lecture: nanoparticles for intracellular nucleic acid delivery.

Authors:  Jordan J Green
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Non-viral gene delivery nanoparticles based on poly(β-amino esters) for treatment of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Stephany Y Tzeng; Hugo Guerrero-Cázares; Elliott E Martinez; Joel C Sunshine; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa; Jordan J Green
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  A degradable polyethylenimine derivative with low toxicity for highly efficient gene delivery.

Authors:  M Laird Forrest; James T Koerber; Daniel W Pack
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.774

8.  A family of bioreducible poly(disulfide amine)s for gene delivery.

Authors:  Mei Ou; Rongzuo Xu; Sun Hwa Kim; David A Bull; Sung Wan Kim
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Gold, poly(beta-amino ester) nanoparticles for small interfering RNA delivery.

Authors:  Jae-Seung Lee; Jordan J Green; Kevin T Love; Joel Sunshine; Robert Langer; Daniel G Anderson
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 11.189

10.  Poly(β-amino ester)-nanoparticle mediated transfection of retinal pigment epithelial cells in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Joel C Sunshine; Sarah B Sunshine; Imran Bhutto; James T Handa; Jordan J Green
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  62 in total

Review 1.  A review of nanotechnological approaches for the prophylaxis of HIV/AIDS.

Authors:  Abhijit A Date; Christopher J Destache
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Engineered nanoparticles for systemic siRNA delivery to malignant brain tumours.

Authors:  Johan Karlsson; Yuan Rui; Kristen L Kozielski; Amanda L Placone; Olivia Choi; Stephany Y Tzeng; Jayoung Kim; Jamal J Keyes; Max I Bogorad; Kathleen Gabrielson; Hugo Guerrero-Cazares; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa; Peter C Searson; Jordan J Green
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 7.790

Review 3.  Oligonucleotide-based theranostic nanoparticles in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Reza Shahbazi; Bulent Ozpolat; Kezban Ulubayram
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 5.307

4.  Mannosylated poly(beta-amino esters) for targeted antigen presenting cell immune modulation.

Authors:  Charles H Jones; Mingfu Chen; Anitha Ravikrishnan; Ryan Reddinger; Guojian Zhang; Anders P Hakansson; Blaine A Pfeifer
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Hybrid biosynthetic gene therapy vector development and dual engineering capacity.

Authors:  Charles H Jones; Anitha Ravikrishnan; Mingfu Chen; Ryan Reddinger; Mahmoud Kamal Ahmadi; Snehal Rane; Anders P Hakansson; Blaine A Pfeifer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Verteporfin-Loaded Poly(ethylene glycol)-Poly(beta-amino ester)-Poly(ethylene glycol) Triblock Micelles for Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Jayoung Kim; James G Shamul; Sagar R Shah; Alyssa Shin; Ben J Lee; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa; Jordan J Green
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 6.988

7.  Nanoparticle-mediated conversion of primary human astrocytes into neurons and oligodendrocytes.

Authors:  Xiaowei Li; Kristen Kozielski; Yu-Hao Cheng; Huanhuan Liu; Camila Gadens Zamboni; Jordan Green; Hai-Quan Mao
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 6.843

8.  Differential polymer structure tunes mechanism of cellular uptake and transfection routes of poly(β-amino ester) polyplexes in human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Jayoung Kim; Joel C Sunshine; Jordan J Green
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 4.774

9.  Overcoming nonviral gene delivery barriers: perspective and future.

Authors:  Charles H Jones; Chih-Kuang Chen; Anitha Ravikrishnan; Snehal Rane; Blaine A Pfeifer
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Evaluation of polymeric gene delivery nanoparticles by nanoparticle tracking analysis and high-throughput flow cytometry.

Authors:  Ron B Shmueli; Nupura S Bhise; Jordan J Green
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 1.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.