| Literature DB >> 22970436 |
Anup Gurung1, Prakash Narayanan, Parimi Prabhakar, Anjana Das, Virupax Ranebennur, Saroj Tucker, Laxmi Narayana, Radha R, K Prakash, J Touthang, Collins Z Sono, Teodora Wi, Guy Morineau, Graham Neilsen.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Avahan, the India AIDS Initiative, implemented a large HIV prevention programme across six high HIV prevalence states amongst high risk groups consisting of female sex workers, high risk men who have sex with men, transgenders and injecting drug users in India. Utilization of the clinical services, health seeking behaviour and trends in syndromic diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections amongst these populations were measured using the individual tracking data.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22970436 PMCID: PMC3287548 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-s6-s10
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Variables used from the individual tracking data
| Area | Variable name | Definition | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unique identifiers | IP name | Name of the lead implementing partner | |
| Project name | Name of implementing NGO | 830 records without project name were deleted during cleaning | |
| Registration date | Date of registration of HRG individual with NGO | 4,500 records without registration date were removed from the master database | |
| ID number | Unique tracking ID entered in the registration file | 55,000 records without ID number were removed from the master database during cleaning | |
| Target group | Target group defined by the typology of HRG, FSW, MSM, TG, IDU, clients and regular partners | 200 records without target groups were grouped as others | |
| Sub target group (place of solicitation for FSW, self-identity for MSM) | Defined by the sub-population within the target groups of HRG: FSW – home-based, street-based, bar-based, brothel-based, lodge-based, highway-based. | Re-grouped the local terminology to make this uniform | |
| Visit date | Date of current visit to the clinic | 2200 records without visit dates were removed during cleaning of the data base | |
| Demographics | Sex | Gender of the STI patient: male, female or transgender | |
| Age | Age in completed years on the first clinic visit | ||
| Number of years in sex work | Number of years into sex work (recorded at the time of registration) | ||
| Number of clients | Number of clients in last week (recorded at the time of first visit) | ||
| Clinic visits | Symptoms visit | “STI symptoms visit” - reason for visit to the clinic was STI related symptoms | |
| Regular STI checkup | “STI check-up” - the individual does not complain of STI symptoms but receives genital examination which may include speculum or proctoscope examination and/or STI Treatment | ||
| Follow-up visit | “STI follow-up” - the individual returned to the clinic within two weeks of last treatment for a review by the doctor | ||
| General visit | General health visit – visit for services other than STI related | ||
| First STI clinic visit | First STI visit to the clinic ever | ||
| Duration of symptoms (days) | Period the patient is suffering from current/longest running STI symptom | Information in actual days as well as in codes - was changed to codes | |
| Internal examination | Whether speculum or proctoscopic examination conducted during STI consultation | ||
| Syndrome diagnosed | Vaginal cervical discharge | Female with vaginal or cervical discharge on examination | |
| Genital ulcer disease | Female or male with genital or ano-rectal ulceration with or without blisters | ||
| Lower abdominal pain | Female has lower abdominal pain or tenderness, or cervical motion tenderness | ||
| Urethral discharge | Male with urethral discharge with or without dysuria | ||
| Ano-rectal discharge | Male with symptoms of tenesmus or if ano-rectal discharge seen on exam | Females with ano-rectal discharge were also recorded as such. | |
| Other syndromes | Other STI syndromes (e.g. inguinal bubo, genital warts, scrotal swelling, genital scabies etc.) | ||
| Asymptomatic | Asymptomatic treatment is given | ||
| None | Asymptomatic treatment is given | ||
| Treatment packs | Coded in packs** | Specific drugs for specific syndromes as per clinical operating guidelines | |
Age and sex work characteristics by high risk group and typology of clinic attendees
| High risk group typology** | Number of individual HRG | Mean age in years (SD*) | Reported clients per week (SD) | Reported number years in sex work (SD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSW | 331,533 | 29.8 (6.6) | 4.4 (8.0) | 3.1 (4.4) |
| Bar-based | 35,584 | 24.7 (5.0) | 1.3 (2.8) | 1.9 (3.4) |
| Brothel-based | 23,864 | 28.8 (6.5) | 7.6 (14) | 2.0 (4.5) |
| Highway-based | 2,253 | 28.6 (6.0) | 11.8 (18) | 2.6 (3.3) |
| Home-based | 116,516 | 30.3 (6.4) | 3.9 (6.5) | 3.5 (4.9) |
| Lodge-based | 9,514 | 29.4 (7.0) | 3.5 (7.2) | 2.7 (3.6) |
| Street-based | 112,384 | 30.8 (6.3) | 6.1 (8.8) | 3.7 (4.1) |
| MSM | 82,293 | 28.8 (8.0) | 3.4 (12.4) | 1.8 (3.6) |
| 22,390 | 29.4 (7.7) | 4.3 (13) | 2.3 (4.1) | |
| 35,961 | 29.4 (8.2) | 3.9 (14) | 1.8 (3.9) | |
| 12,025 | 27.8 (7.7) | 0.1 (3.6) | 0.03 (0.4) | |
| TG | 7,328 | 29.9 (8.9) | 2.8 (8.9) | 1.6 (3.7) |
| IDU | 10,280 | 27.1(5.6) | Not applicable | Not applicable |
* SD - standard deviation.
** Typology - for FSW is defined by the place of solicitation for sex work: bar, brothel, highways, home, lodge or street-based. Typology for MSM is based on reported self identity of being receptive (Kothi), insertive (Panthi) or both (Double decker) during anal sex.
Percentage of high risk groups who accessed clinical services
| Typology of HRG | Percentage individual HRG who accessed clinics out of the estimated figures* | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | p-values** |
| FSW (all) | 68 | 78 | 100 | <0.001 |
| Brothel based | 108 | 172 | 230 | <0.001 |
| Lodge based | 90 | 94 | 181 | <0.001 |
| Bar based | 82 | 101 | 161 | <0.001 |
| Street based | 69 | 69 | 90 | <0.001 |
| Home based | 75 | 85 | 97 | <0.001 |
| MSM (all) | 43 | 54 | 79 | <0.001 |
| Kothi | 40 | 48 | 68 | <0.001 |
| Panthi | 98 | 108 | 121 | <0.001 |
| Double decker | 57 | 73 | 113 | <0.001 |
| IDU*** | 14 | 21 | 24 | <0.01 |
* Denominator used were the estimated figures of HRG calculated by the lead implementing partners for the year 2007,2008 & 2009 by typology.
** p values using X2.
*** IDU were asked to report to the clinics only if they had STI symptoms/general health ailments or IDU related problems like abscess unlike the other HRG who were mobilized to come for regular STI check ups.
*** Mapping data not available for year 2005 & 2006.
Dynamic cohort of high risk groups followed over the years in Avahan clinics
| Follow up of annual cohorts** | % retained within the cohort by years of follow up# | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All HRG individuals | New Individual HRGs& coming into the cohort | Year-zero | 2nd year | 3rd year | 4th year | 5th year |
| 2005 | 43,394 | 100 | 51 | 39.7 | 31.6 | 24.2 |
| 2006 | 108,836 | 100 | 61.7 | 46.2 | 33.5 | |
| 2007 | 169.612 | 100 | 68.6 | 47.4 | ||
| 2008 | 220,877 | 100 | 62 | |||
| MSM | Year-zero | 2nd year | 3rd year | 4th year | 5th year | |
| 2005 | 4,887 | 100 | 52 | 41.2 | 32.8 | 25.2 |
| 2006 | 15,833 | 100 | 63 | 46.7 | 33.5 | |
| 2007 | 29,848 | 100 | 68.9 | 47.1 | ||
| 2008 | 42,084 | 100 | 63.5 | |||
| FSW | Year-zero | 2nd year | 3rd year | 4th year | 5th year | |
| 2005 | 36,757 | 100 | 46 | 36 | 28 | 22 |
| 2006 | 87,480 | 100 | 63 | 52 | 41 | |
| 2007 | 132,144 | 100 | 75 | 57 | ||
| 2008 | 165,832 | 100 | 69 | |||
Annual cohorts were defined as the new HRGs coming in the clinics in the particular year.
# % retained in the cohort is the persons retained in the follow period who belong to the annual cohort.
& new HRGs implies new to the clinics.
Increasing health seeking by category of HRG 2005-2009 adjusted for age and typology
| Category/variable | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | p-value* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal examination | % examined out of total visits | |||||
| FSW | 10 | 28 | 42 | 48 | 53 | <0.001 |
| MSM | 1 | 6 | 17 | 45 | 54 | <0.001 |
| TG | 0.7 | 35 | 44 | 32 | 27 | <0.001 |
| Regular STI check ups | % reported for STI check ups out of total visits | |||||
| All HRG | 12 | 31 | 45 | 50 | 48 | <0.001 |
| MSM | 22 | 46 | 57 | 59 | 53 | <0.001 |
| FSW | 10 | 28 | 42 | 48 | 47 | <0.001 |
| TG | 29 | 56 | 61 | 72 | 71 | <0.001 |
| Treatment seeking behaviour | % reported within 2 days of onset of symptoms | |||||
| FSW with VCD# | 7 | 13 | 20 | 22 | 32 | <0.001 |
| MSM with UD§ | 6 | 8 | 11 | 27 | 24 | <0.001 |
| IDU with UD | 28 | 16 | 23 | 16 | 21 | <0.001 |
| TG with ARD€ | 21 | 11 | 43 | 56 | 35 | <0.001 |
| Treatment seeking behaviour | % reported within 3-7 days of onset of symptoms | |||||
| FSW with VCD | 11 | 17 | 25 | 23 | 16 | <0.001 |
| MSM with UD | 26 | 35 | 35 | 32 | 30 | <0.001 |
| IDU with UD | 25 | 19 | 24 | 33 | 38 | <0.001 |
| TG with ARD | 43 | 45 | 32 | 29 | 27 | <0.001 |
| Number of visits per year | % reported per year | |||||
| FSW N=331,616 individuals made 2,11,727 clinic visits | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | p-value * |
| 1 to 2 visits per year | 79 | 50 | 31 | 20 | 21 | <0.001 |
| 2 to 4 visits per year | 14 | 22 | 21 | 18 | 13 | <0.001 |
| More than 4 visits per year | 8 | 28 | 48 | 62 | 66 | <0.001 |
| HR-MSM N=82,246 made 5,25,862 clinic visits | % reported per year | |||||
| 1 to 2 visits per year | 72 | 53 | 35 | 22 | 22 | <0.001 |
| 2 to 4 visits per year | 14 | 20 | 21 | 19 | 13 | <0.001 |
| More than 4 visits per year | 14 | 28 | 44 | 59 | 65 | <0.001 |
| TG N=7,330 individuals made 38,613 clinic visits | % reported per year | |||||
| 1 to 2 visits per year | 63 | 53 | 29 | 21 | 29 | <0.001 |
| 2 to 4 visits per year | 16 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | <0.001 |
| More than 4 visits per year | 22 | 30 | 54 | 62 | 54 | <0.001 |
| IDU N=10,280 individuals made 23990 clinic visits | % reported per year | |||||
| 1 to 2 visits per year | 96 | 91 | 75 | 44 | 64 | <0.001 |
| 2 to 4 visits per year | 4 | 8 | 17 | 20 | 14 | <0.001 |
| More than 4 visits per year | 0.1 | 1 | 8 | 37 | 22 | <0.001 |
* p values matched for age & typology.
# VCD Vaginal cervical discharge.
§ UD Urethral discharge.
€ ARD Ano rectal discharge.
Trends of STI syndromes diagnosed amongst clinic attendees: 2005-2009, adjusted for age and typology
| Category | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | Odds ratio* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No of syndromes diagnosed | ||||||
| Percentage diagnosed out of total visits | ||||||
| FSW | ||||||
| VD (287,070) | 30 | 24 | 16 | 12 | 10 | 0.7 |
| GUD (11,913) | 2 | 1 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.67 |
| LAP (63,499) | 10 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0.63 |
| Any STI§ (353,699) | 39 | 30 | 20 | 15 | 11 | 0.67 |
| MSM | ||||||
| UD (16,574) | 6.6 | 6.2 | 4.7 | 3.3 | 1.7 | 0.67 |
| ARD (8,638) | 2 | 3.2 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 0.79 |
| GUD (5,191) | 3.4 | 2.2 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.63 |
| Any STI& (30,242) | 12 | 11 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 0.61 |
| MSM Kothi** | ||||||
| UD (6,964) | 4.02 | 4.75 | 3.74 | 3.17 | 1.49 | 0.71 |
| ARD (5471) | 2.28 | 3.94 | 2.23 | 2.61 | 1.4 | 0.79 |
| MSM Panthi&& | ||||||
| UD (3,981) | 25.55 | 15.68 | 8.55 | 3.95 | 2.2 | 0.48 |
| ARD (764) | 3.8 | 3.61 | 1.05 | 0.71 | 0.7 | 0.61 |
| MSM Double decker## | ||||||
| UD (4,201) | 7.77 | 5.46 | 4.93 | 3.36 | 1.63 | 0.64 |
| ARD (1,967) | 1.58 | 2.62 | 1.39 | 1.8 | 1.01 | 0.81 |
| TG | ||||||
| Any STI (1,039) | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.92 |
| IDU | ||||||
| Any STI (6,267) | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.47 |
* p-value for all syndromes = <0.001.
§ Any STI FSW: includes vaginal discharge (VD), genital ulcer disease (GUD), lower abdominal pain (LAP), ano-rectal discharge, genital warts, genital scabies etc.
& Any STI MSM/TG/IDU: includes urethral discharge (UD), ano-rectal discharge (ARD), genital ulcer disease (GUD), scrotal swelling, inguinal bubo, genital warts, genital scabies etc.
** Kothi MSM who are self identified as anal receptive.
&& Panthi MSM who self identified as anal penetrative.
## Double decker MSM who self identify as both anal recpetors as well as penetrator.
Figure 1Decreasing trends of STI syndromes and improving health seeking behaviour Jan 2005 to June 2009.
Correct treatment* for STI syndromes 2005-2009
| % who received correct treatment based on dispensing the correct syndrome packet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | (mean of 2005 - 2009) | |
| Clients or regular partners with urethral discharge§ (1339) | 97.5 | 91.7 | 94.4 | 89.5 | 92.3 | 91.9 |
| IDU with urethral discharge (41,709) | 94.3 | 85.0 | 86.3 | 89.3 | 89.8 | 88.0 |
| MSM with urethral discharge (16,574) | 78.4 | 88.4 | 87.9 | 62.6 | 79.6 | 77.6 |
| MSM with ano-rectal discharge€ (8,638) | 57.9 | 86.6 | 86.0 | 49.2 | 90.6 | 74.1 |
| TG with urethral discharge (362) | 87.5 | 94.3 | 75.9 | 50.4 | 78.6 | 71.5 |
| FSW with vaginal cervical discharge# (287,070) | 92.3 | 93.6 | 94.8 | 95.9 | 96.4 | 94.6 |
| FSW with lower abdominal pain¥ (63,499) | 57.3 | 63.0 | 62.3 | 56.4 | 67.6 | 61.3 |
* Correct treatment was defined as the correct treatment packets given as per the syndromes diagnosed during each clinic visit.
** STI syndrome diagnosed: all STI syndromes were diagnosed as per clinical guidelines.
§ Urethral discharge: defined as males with urethral discharge on clinical examination with or without dysuria.
€ Ano-rectal discharge: defined as symptoms of tenesmus and ano-rectal discharge seen on clinical examination.
# Vaginal cervical discharge: defined as female with vaginal or cervical discharge on examination.
¥ Lower abdominal pain: defined as female who has lower abdominal pain with or without cervical motion tenderness.