| Literature DB >> 22970238 |
Daniele Porretta1, Valentina Mastrantonio, Romeo Bellini, Pradya Somboon, Sandra Urbanelli.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus, is one of the 100 most invasive species in the world and a vector of human diseases. In the last 30 years, it has spread from its native range in East Asia to Africa, Europe, and the Americas. Although this modern invasion has been the focus of many studies, the history of the species' native populations remains poorly understood. Here, we aimed to assess the role of Pleistocene climatic changes in shaping the current distribution of the species in its native range. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22970238 PMCID: PMC3435282 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044515
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Sampling sites and phylogenetic relationships among mitochondrial haplotypes.
(A) Map of East Asia showing the sampling sites of Aedes albopictus. For localities details see Table 1. (B) Statistical parsimony network, constructed using TCS software, showing phylogenetic relationships among the haplotypes found. Haplotypes are shown as circles with sizes corresponding to their frequencies in the total sample and colour corresponding to populations where they have been observed. Haplotypes are encoded as in Table 1. Dots indicate missing intermediate haplotypes.
Geographical origin, sample size and haplotypes’ distribution for the 16 sampled populations of Aedes albopictus (haplotypes in bold have been found in two or more localities; the number in brackets indicates how many time a haplotype has been observed at a particular locality).
| Code | Locality (Country) | Lat. | Long. | Sample size | Haplotypes |
|
|
| 1. | Choral uji (Japan) | 34°21′ N | 133°29′ E | 14 |
| 0.472±0.136 | 0.0006±0.0005 |
| 2. | Tanega Shima (Japan) | 30°36′ N | 130°56′ E | 15 |
| 0.371±0.153 | 0.0006±0.0005 |
| 3. | Nagasaki (Japan) | 32°47′ N | 129°49′ E | 4 |
| – | – |
| 4. | Okinawa (Japan | 26°20′ N | 127°52′ E | 11 |
| 0.509±0.100 | 0.0010±0.0008 |
| 5. | Hangzhou (China) | 30°16′ N | 120°11′ E | 7 |
| 0.286±0.200 | 0.0006±0.0005 |
| 6. | Zhenyuan (China) | 27°13′ N | 108°18′ E | 10 |
| 0.533±0.095 | 0.0004±0.0004 |
| 7. | Shantou (China) | 23°22′ N | 116°40′ E | 8 |
| 0.893±0.111 | 0.0019±0.0013 |
| 8. | Taoyuan (Taiwan, China) | 23°12′ N | 120°50′ E | 11 |
| 0.800±0.114 | 0.0012±0.0008 |
| 9. | Vinh Phuc (Vietnam) | 21°18′ N | 105°34′ E | 15 |
| 0.933±0.050 | 0.0023±0.0014 |
| 10. | Hanoi (Vietnam) | 20°55′ N | 105°51′ E | 13 |
| 0.950±0.042 | 0.0014±0.0010 |
| 11. | Phuntsholing (Bhutan) | 26°34′ N | 89°16′ E | 11 | h36(2), h37(2), h38(2), h39, h40,h41, h42, | 0.946±0.053 | 0.0021±0.0014 |
| 12. | Gelephu (Bhutan) | 26°36′ N | 90°31′ E | 10 |
| 0.844±0.103 | 0.0018±0.0012 |
| 13. | Chiang Mai (Thailand) | 18°51′ N | 98°36′ E | 13 |
| 0.923±0.050 | 0.0022±0.0013 |
| 14. | Lampang (Thailand) | 18°41′ N | 99°47′ E | 10 |
| 0.933±0.077 | 0.0022±0.0014 |
| 15. | Ratchaburi (Thailand) | 13°10′ N | 99°50′ E | 6 |
| 0.933±0.122 | 0.0014±0.0010 |
| 16. | Songkhla (Thailand) | 6°48′ N | 100°35′ E | 16 |
| 0.700±0.127 | 0.0017±0.0021 |
Haplotype diversity, h (± SD), and nucleotidic diversity, π (± SD), are also given.
Figure 2Historical demographic analyses.
(A) Mismatch distribution computed using the software Arlequin 3.1. Histograms show the observed distribution; lines show the expected distribution under a model of sudden population expansion. (B) Bayesian Skyline Plot, constructed using the software beast 1.6.1. Population size (y-axis) is measured as the product of effective population size per generation length (N eτ). The solid line is the median estimate, and the grey areas show the 95% Highest Posterior Density (HPD) limits. Time ( axis) is expressed in years before present (BP).
Figure 3Bioclimatic models for Aedes albopictus.
(A) Last Interglacial (LIG; ∼140,000–120,000 years BP); (B) Last Glacial Maximum (LGM, ∼21,000 years BP); (C) current conditions. All models were developed using the “maximum entropy model” as implemented in the software Maxent 3.3.3e. In dark grey are shown the areas predicted as suitable by both the CCSM and MIROC models.