Literature DB >> 22970055

Evaluation of microsatellite instability in women with epithelial ovarian cancer.

Leonardo Pandolfi Caliman1, Rubens Lene Carvalho Tavares, Josiane Barbosa Piedade, Ana Carolina Silvano Couto DE Assis, Karen DE Jesus Dias DA Cunha, Letícia DA Conceição Braga, Luciana Maria Silva, Agnaldo Lopes DA Silva Filho.   

Abstract

The function of microsatellite instability (MSI) and the optimal panel of markers for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) are not well established. This study aimed to use the National Cancer Institute (NCI) markers BAT25, BAT26, D2S123, D5S346 and D17S250 to evaluate MSI in patients with ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma, compared with ovarian serous cystadenoma and normal ovaries. A total of 37 patients were divided into three groups, as follows: cystadenocarcinoma (n=13), cystadenoma (n=10) and normal ovaries (n=14). DNA was extracted with TRIzol and quantified by spectrophotometry. MSI was evaluated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and classified as high (MSI-H), low (MSI-L) or stable (MSS). FIGO staging was I/II in 23.1% and III/IV in 76.9% of the cystadenocarcinoma group. Polymorphisms were found using at least one marker in 32 women, and were observed with D2S123 (83.7%), D17S250 (81.1%), D5S346 (72.9%), BAT25 (21.6%) and BAT26 (16.2%) markers. In the cystadenocarcinoma group, BAT25, BAT26, D2S123, D5S346 and D17S250 markers were positive in 30.8, 76.9, 53.8, 69.2 and 69.2% of patients, respectively. The same markers were positive in 30, 50, 40, 60 and 30% of the cystadenoma group, and 50, 71.4, 71.4, 64.3 and 63.3% in the normal ovary group, respectively. MSI-H was present in 84.6, 60 and 78.6% of the cystadenocarcinoma, cystadenoma and normal patients, respectively. MSI-L was detected in 0, 30 and 7.1%, and MSS was identified in 15.4, 10 and 14.3% of the cystadenocarcinoma, cystadenoma and normal patients, respectively. The frequency of MSI in both benign epithelial ovarian neoplasms and in normal ovaries was high, as well as in EOC, with no statistically significant difference between the groups. This suggests that MSI may arise as a consequence of the ovulatory process, and not solely as a feature of malignant ovarian tumors.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22970055      PMCID: PMC3439170          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2012.776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  25 in total

Review 1.  Frequency of mismatch repair deficiency in ovarian cancer: a systematic review This article is a US Government work and, as such, is in the public domain of the United States of America.

Authors:  Megan A Murphy; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 2.  Precursor lesions of ovarian epithelial malignancy.

Authors:  K M Feeley; M Wells
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 3.  Prophylactic and risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy: recommendations based on risk of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan S Berek; Eva Chalas; Mitchell Edelson; David H Moore; William M Burke; William A Cliby; Andrew Berchuck
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Application of the National Cancer Institute international criteria for determination of microsatellite instability in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  A K Sood; R Holmes; M J Hendrix; R E Buller
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 5.  Prevention of ovarian cancer: intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Molly A Brewer; Karen Johnson; Michele Follen; David Gershenson; Robert Bast
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Different types of microsatellite instability in ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Gad Singer; Thore Kallinowski; Arndt Hartmann; Wolfgang Dietmaier; Peter J Wild; Peter Schraml; Guido Sauter; Michael J Mihatsch; Holger Moch
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2004-11-20       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 7.  Targeting poly (ADP) ribose polymerase I (PARP-1) and PARP-1 interacting proteins for cancer treatment.

Authors:  Elza T Sakamoto-Hojo; Adayabalam S Balajee
Journal:  Anticancer Agents Med Chem       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.505

8.  Cancer statistics, 2009.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Elizabeth Ward; Yongping Hao; Jiaquan Xu; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Bryan T Hennessy; Robert L Coleman; Maurie Markman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Clinical significance of microsatellite instability in sporadic epithelial ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Bo-Sung Yoon; Young-Tae Kim; Jae-Hoon Kim; Sang-Wun Kim; Eun-Ji Nam; Nam-Hoon Cho; Jae-Wook Kim; Sunghoon Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 2.759

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Mismatch Repair Deficiency and Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade.

Authors:  Valerie Lee; Adrian Murphy; Dung T Le; Luis A Diaz
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-07-13

2.  Association between IHC and MSI testing to identify mismatch repair-deficient patients with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Ji-Hyun Lee; Deborah Cragun; Zachary Thompson; Domenico Coppola; Santo V Nicosia; Mohammad Akbari; Shiyu Zhang; John McLaughlin; Steven Narod; Joellen Schildkraut; Thomas A Sellers; Tuya Pal
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2014-03-04

3.  Somatic microsatellite variability as a predictive marker for colorectal cancer and liver cancer progression.

Authors:  Zalman Vaksman; Harold R Garner
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-03-20

4.  Screening for Lynch syndrome using risk assessment criteria in patients with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Takashi Takeda; Kosuke Tsuji; Kouji Banno; Megumi Yanokura; Yusuke Kobayashi; Eiichiro Tominaga; Daisuke Aoki
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 4.401

5.  Mismatch Repair Protein Loss as a Prognostic and Predictive Biomarker in Breast Cancers Regardless of Microsatellite Instability.

Authors:  Nicola Fusco; Gianluca Lopez; Chiara Corti; Chiara Pesenti; Patrizia Colapietro; Giulia Ercoli; Gabriella Gaudioso; Alice Faversani; Donatella Gambini; Anna Michelotti; Luca Despini; Concetta Blundo; Valentina Vaira; Monica Miozzo; Stefano Ferrero; Silvano Bosari
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2018-12-13

Review 6.  Correlations between microsatellite instability and the biological behaviour of tumours.

Authors:  Guang Yang; Ru-Yi Zheng; Zai-Shun Jin
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  Prognostic significance of microsatellite instability‑associated pathways and genes in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Xiaosheng Hang; Dapeng Li; Jianping Wang; Ge Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 4.101

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.