| Literature DB >> 22969727 |
Heikki M Karinen1, Arja Uusitalo, Henri Vähä-Ypyä, Mika Kähönen, Juha E Peltonen, Phyllis K Stein, Jari Viik, Heikki O Tikkanen.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: If the body fails to acclimatize at high altitude, acute mountain sickness (AMS) may result. For the early detection of AMS, changes in cardiac autonomic function measured by heart rate variability (HRV) may be more sensitive than clinical symptoms alone. The purpose of this study was to ascertain if the changes in HRV during ascent are related to AMS.Entities:
Keywords: altitude illness; extreme altitude; heart rate variation; mountaineering
Year: 2012 PMID: 22969727 PMCID: PMC3431006 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00336
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Figure 1Ascent profiles of different expeditions and number of AMS cases at different altitudes. Three climbers descended after 4300 m because of AMS. Measurements were made daily up to 5300 m except on Shisha Pangma, where measurements were made up to 5600 m. AMS, Acute Mountain Sickness; AMS*, AMS at this altitude; AMS**, AMS at some other altitude.
Demographic data (age, BMI, and .
| Age (years)* | 30 ± 5 | 33 ± 7 | 32 ± 6 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24 ± 1 | 25 ± 4 | 25 ± 3 |
| 60 ± 4 | 60 ± 9 | 59 ± 7 |
There were no statistically significant differences in the basic characteristics between no-AMS and AMS groups.
Values are mean ± SD. BMI, body mass index; , maximal oxygen uptake.
Resting heart rate (HR) and HRV parameters at 2400 m among the climbers who subsequently developed AMS at two different altitude ranges, and those who had no subsequent AMS.
| HR (beats/min) | 70 ± 9 | 82 ± 15 | 62 ± 8 |
| RMSSD (ms) | 43 ± 25 | 21 ± 13 | 48 ± 32 |
| lnLF (ms2) | 7 ± 1 | 6 ± 1 | 6 ± 1 |
| lnHF (ms2) | 6 ± 1 | 5 ± 2 | 7 ± 2 |
| LF/HF | 5 ± 4 | 6 ± 6 | 1.2 ± 1.1 |
| R-SpO2 | 94 ± 1 | 93 ± 2 | 94 ± 2 |
| Ex-SpO2 | 91 ± 2 | 88 ± 3 | 89 ± 3 |
Values are presented in mean ± SD. (
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01, difference between AMS 3500–4300 m vs. no-AMS groups and AMS ≥ 5000 m vs. no-AMS groups,
p < 0.05, difference between AMS 3500–4300 m vs. AMS ≥ 5000 m).
Figure 2Negative correlation between HR and positive correlation between lnHF, lnLF, and RMSSD at 2400 m altitude and the lowest altitude at which a climber got AMS (HR no-AMS subjects datapoints are added at 5600 m level.
Figure 3Scattergram showing the distribution of values of RMSSD and Ex-SpO The cut-off lines RMSSD2min ≤ 30 ms and Ex-SpO2 ≤ 91% are for 92% sensitivity for AMS.
Sensitivity and specificity of chosen parameters at 2400 m altitude for AMS at 3000–4300 m.
| RMSSD2 min ≤ 30 | 92 | 58 | 61 | 83 | 22(5–39) |
| Ex-SpO2 ≤ 91 % | 92 | 40 | 65 | 80 | 3 (1–5) |