BACKGROUND: Previous investigations have suggested beneficial effects of fresh versus stored red blood cell transfusion in critically ill patients. The present study investigates the effects of red blood cell storage time on the clinical course and hemodynamic and laboratory parameters in patients with septic shock. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 18 patients with septic shock received 2 erythrocyte units stored for ? 7 days (n = 8) or > 7 days (n = 10). The sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score was calculated for 7 days. Hemodynamic parameters (cardiac index, extravascular lung water) were determined using transpulmonary thermodilution. Laboratory parameters (lactate, base excess, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, IL-1Β, IL-6, TNF-α, sVCAM-1, sICAM-1) were monitored before and 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after transfusion. The Mann-Whitney-U test and Neumann test were used for group comparison and trend assessment, respectively. RESULTS: We failed to observe significant differences with respect to SOFA scores between patients receiving fresh or stored erythrocytes. However, a significant trend towards an improvement in the SOFA score was found in the group receiving fresh erythrocytes (p < 0.01). No significant differences in hemodynamic or laboratory parameters were found between both groups. CONCLUSION: While the present findings do not provide clear-cut evidence supporting beneficial effects of fresh red blood cells in septic shock, they warrant larger randomized studies to confirm or refute such effects.
BACKGROUND: Previous investigations have suggested beneficial effects of fresh versus stored red blood cell transfusion in critically illpatients. The present study investigates the effects of red blood cell storage time on the clinical course and hemodynamic and laboratory parameters in patients with septic shock. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 18 patients with septic shock received 2 erythrocyte units stored for ? 7 days (n = 8) or > 7 days (n = 10). The sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score was calculated for 7 days. Hemodynamic parameters (cardiac index, extravascular lung water) were determined using transpulmonary thermodilution. Laboratory parameters (lactate, base excess, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, IL-1Β, IL-6, TNF-α, sVCAM-1, sICAM-1) were monitored before and 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after transfusion. The Mann-Whitney-U test and Neumann test were used for group comparison and trend assessment, respectively. RESULTS: We failed to observe significant differences with respect to SOFA scores between patients receiving fresh or stored erythrocytes. However, a significant trend towards an improvement in the SOFA score was found in the group receiving fresh erythrocytes (p < 0.01). No significant differences in hemodynamic or laboratory parameters were found between both groups. CONCLUSION: While the present findings do not provide clear-cut evidence supporting beneficial effects of fresh red blood cells in septic shock, they warrant larger randomized studies to confirm or refute such effects.
Authors: Eldad A Hod; Ning Zhang; Set A Sokol; Boguslaw S Wojczyk; Richard O Francis; Daniel Ansaldi; Kevin P Francis; Phyllis Della-Latta; Susan Whittier; Sujit Sheth; Jeanne E Hendrickson; James C Zimring; Gary M Brittenham; Steven L Spitalnik Journal: Blood Date: 2010-03-18 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: R Phillip Dellinger; Mitchell M Levy; Jean M Carlet; Julian Bion; Margaret M Parker; Roman Jaeschke; Konrad Reinhart; Derek C Angus; Christian Brun-Buisson; Richard Beale; Thierry Calandra; Jean-Francois Dhainaut; Herwig Gerlach; Maurene Harvey; John J Marini; John Marshall; Marco Ranieri; Graham Ramsay; Jonathan Sevransky; B Taylor Thompson; Sean Townsend; Jeffrey S Vender; Janice L Zimmerman; Jean-Louis Vincent Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Marco Ranucci; Concetta Carlucci; Giuseppe Isgrò; Alessandra Boncilli; Donatella De Benedetti; Teresa De la Torre; Simonetta Brozzi; Alessandro Frigiola Journal: Crit Care Date: 2009-12-21 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Colleen Gorman Koch; Liang Li; Daniel I Sessler; Priscilla Figueroa; Gerald A Hoeltge; Tomislav Mihaljevic; Eugene H Blackstone Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-03-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Yasser Sakr; Marialuisa Chierego; Michaël Piagnerelli; Colin Verdant; Marc-Jacques Dubois; Marc Koch; Jacques Creteur; Antonino Gullo; Jean-Louis Vincent; Daniel De Backer Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: G Dessertaine; L Hammer; F Chenais; J Rémy; C Schwebel; A Tabah; C Ara-Somohano; A Bonadona; R Hamidfar-Roy; D Barnoud; J-F Timsit Journal: Transfus Clin Biol Date: 2008-08-30 Impact factor: 1.406
Authors: Santiago R Leal-Noval; Irene Jara-López; José L García-Garmendia; Ana Marín-Niebla; Angel Herruzo-Avilés; Pedro Camacho-Laraña; Jesús Loscertales Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 7.892