| Literature DB >> 22969378 |
Dezhi Zheng1, Jiying Shi, Shangchun Fan.
Abstract
In order to increase the accuracy of on-line liquid density measurements, a sensor equipped with a tuning fork as the resonant sensitive component is designed in this paper. It is a quasi-digital sensor with simple structure and high precision. The sensor is based on resonance theory and composed of a sensitive unit and a closed-loop control unit, where the sensitive unit consists of the actuator, the resonant tuning fork and the detector and the closed-loop control unit comprises precondition circuit, digital signal processing and control unit, analog-to-digital converter and digital-to-analog converter. An approximate parameters model of the tuning fork is established and the impact of liquid density, position of the tuning fork, temperature and structural parameters on the natural frequency of the tuning fork are also analyzed. On this basis, a tuning fork liquid density measurement sensor is developed. In addition, experimental testing on the sensor has been carried out on standard calibration facilities under constant 20 °C, and the sensor coefficients are calibrated. The experimental results show that the repeatability error is about 0.03% and the accuracy is about 0.4 kg/m(3). The results also confirm that the method to increase the accuracy of liquid density measurement is feasible.Entities:
Keywords: liquid density measurement; natural frequency; resonant sensor; tuning fork
Year: 2012 PMID: 22969378 PMCID: PMC3436007 DOI: 10.3390/s120607905
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1.Schematic of the resonant tuning fork liquid density measurement sensor.
Figure 2.Natural frequency of the tuning fork changes with the liquid density.
Figure 3.Tuning fork model.
Figure 4.(a) Natural frequency of the tuning fork changes with the length; (b) Natural frequency of the tuning fork changes with the width.
Material properties for stainless steel 316 L.
| Stainless steel 316 L | 195 | 7,980 | 20∼100 °C | 100 °C | 300 °C |
|
| |||||
| 16.0 | 15.1 | 18.4 | |||
Figure 5.(a) Front view of the tuning fork; (b) Left view of the tuning fork; (c) Back view of the tuning fork (unit: mm).
Figure 6.(a) Tuning fork; (b) Support flange.
Figure 7.Block diagram of digital closed-loop control system.
Figure 8.(a) Digital closed-loop control system; (b) Theoretical prototype.
Experimental data at 20 °C.
| 1 | 789.0 | 789.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0073 |
| 789.0 | 789.1 | 0.1 | 0.013 | ||
| 789.0 | 789.1 | 0.1 | 0.013 | ||
|
| |||||
| 2 | 834.0 | 833.8 | −0.2 | −0.024 | |
| 834.1 | 833.9 | −0.2 | −0.024 | 0.0069 | |
| 834.0 | 833.9 | −0.1 | −0.012 | ||
|
| |||||
| 3 | 859.9 | 860.3 | 0.4 | 0.046 | |
| 860.0 | 860.4 | 0.4 | 0.046 | 0.0067 | |
| 860.1 | 860.4 | 0.3 | 0.035 | ||
|
| |||||
| 4 | 998.1 | 998.2 | 0.1 | 0.010 | |
| 998.0 | 998.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.015 | |
| 998.0 | 997.8 | −0.2 | −0.020 | ||
|
| |||||
| 5 | 1120.5 | 1120.7 | 0.2 | 0.018 | |
| 1121.1 | 1120.8 | −0.3 | −0.027 | 0.032 | |
| 1121.0 | 1120.8 | −0.2 | −0.018 | ||
Figure 9.(a) Temperature controller(GDS-50L); (b) Communication software.
Figure 10.Natural frequency of the tuning fork changes with temperature.