| Literature DB >> 22969348 |
Jong-Jae Lee1, Hoai-Nam Ho, Jong-Han Lee.
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a vision-based rotational angle measurement system for large-scale civil structures. Despite the fact that during the last decade several rotation angle measurement systems were introduced, they however often required complex and expensive equipment. Therefore, alternative effective solutions with high resolution are in great demand. The proposed system consists of commercial PCs, commercial camcorders, low-cost frame grabbers, and a wireless LAN router. The calculation of rotation angle is obtained by using image processing techniques with pre-measured calibration parameters. Several laboratory tests were conducted to verify the performance of the proposed system. Compared with the commercial rotation angle measurement, the results of the system showed very good agreement with an error of less than 1.0% in all test cases. Furthermore, several tests were conducted on the five-story modal testing tower with a hybrid mass damper to experimentally verify the feasibility of the proposed system.Entities:
Keywords: displacement measurement; flexible structures; rotation angle; vision-based system
Year: 2012 PMID: 22969348 PMCID: PMC3435977 DOI: 10.3390/s120607326
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Commercial tilt sensors.
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IK360 [ | ±180 | 0.010 | 100.0 | UK |
| M3 [ | ±70 | 0.010 | 3.3 | Korea |
| SX 41100 [ | ±70 | 0.014 | 10.0 | France |
| Portable Tiltmeter SC [ | ±53 | 0.002 | USA | |
| MNS-45-D2 [ | ±45 | 0.100 | 10.0 | Germany |
| ARN-INC2D [ | ±40 | 0.010 | India | |
| ZCT215M-LBS-BUS-B1-30 [ | ±15 | 0.010 | 2.0 | China |
unavailable data;
static mode.
Figure 2.Typical application examples.
Figure 3.Experimental setup.
Static test results.
| 1 | 4.45 | 13.88 | 1.05 | 1.601 | 1.592 | 0.57 |
| 2 | 5.65 | 16.85 | 1.51 | 1.851 | 1.865 | 0.75 |
| 3 | 6.41 | 18.99 | 2.19 | 1.984 | 1.973 | 0.56 |
| 4 | 6.81 | 20.19 | 2.31 | 2.114 | 2.128 | 0.66 |
| 5 | 8.16 | 24.42 | 2.42 | 2.640 | 2.663 | 0.86 |
Figure 4.Dynamic test results.
Figure 5.Field-test setup.
Figure 6.Measured and estimated data under sinusoidal excitation.
Figure 7.Measured and estimated data under random excitation.