Literature DB >> 2296887

Changing use of coronary angioplasty and coronary bypass surgery in the treatment of chronic coronary artery disease.

W S Weintraub1, E L Jones, S B King, J Craver, J S Douglas, R Guyton, H Liberman, D Morris.   

Abstract

Changes in the use of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) over the last several years have resulted in a new and different environment for the interventional treatment of coronary artery disease. This study explores these changes as applied to the treatment of chronic coronary artery disease. The study population comprised 14,078 patients undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization between 1981 and 1988. In 1981, 1,704 patients underwent a first known cardiac catheterization at Emory University Hospital or Crawford W. Long Hospital and were found to have significant coronary artery disease. Of these patients, 51.7% were treated medically, 44.0% by CABG and 4.3% with PTCA. A similar group comprised 1,719 patients in 1988. Of this group 41.2% were treated medically, 28.5% with CABG and 30.3% with PTCA. The data reveal a much more complex phenomenon than a simple increase in PTCA for the treatment of coronary disease at the expense of CABG. The CABG group aged such that the percent of the CABG population more than 65 years old increased from 26.0% of the total in 1981 to 44.9% of the total in 1988. The percent of patients with ejection fractions less than 50% in the CABG population increased from 24.5% in 1981 to 29.7% in 1988. The PTCA population had less severe disease, was younger and had better left ventricular function.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2296887     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)90082-c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  8 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in cardiology.

Authors:  C F Shakespeare; D J Coltart
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 2.  Korean Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Heart Failure.

Authors:  Min-Seok Kim; Ju-Hee Lee; Eung Ju Kim; Dae-Gyun Park; Sung-Ji Park; Jin Joo Park; Mi-Seung Shin; Byung Su Yoo; Jong-Chan Youn; Sang Eun Lee; Sang Hyun Ihm; Se Yong Jang; Sang-Ho Jo; Jae Yeong Cho; Hyun-Jai Cho; Seonghoon Choi; Jin-Oh Choi; Seong Woo Han; Kyung Kuk Hwang; Eun Seok Jeon; Myeong-Chan Cho; Shung Chull Chae; Dong-Ju Choi
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.243

3.  Factors affecting the therapeutic choice in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. The Studio Lombardo Angiografia Multivasali (SLAM) Study Group.

Authors:  S De Servi; S Galli; M Onofri; E Boschetti; R Oberti; L Niccoli; A M De Biase; G Rovelli; M Carini; F Regalia; P Valentini; A Bartorelli
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 4.  MYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION.

Authors:  R S Rajan
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2017-06-26

5.  Coronary surgery without cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  S Westaby
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-03

6.  Trends in coronary artery revascularisation procedures in Western Australia, 1980-2001.

Authors:  M S T Hobbs; K A McCaul; M W Knuiman; J M Rankin; I Gilfillan
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Estimating clinical morbidity due to ischemic heart disease and congestive heart failure: the future rise of heart failure.

Authors:  L Bonneux; J J Barendregt; K Meeter; G J Bonsel; P J van der Maas
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Trends in coronary artery bypass grafting in Ontario from 1981 to 1989.

Authors:  A M Ugnat; C D Naylor
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.