Andreas Machens1, Henning Dralle. 1. Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany. andreasmachens@aol.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This institutional study aimed at quantifying a medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) patient's risk of lung, liver, or bone metastasis. BACKGROUND: Without quantitative information regarding risk factors for lung, liver, and bone metastasis, risk stratification is liable to be haphazard, resulting in poor cost-effectiveness of screening programs. METHODS: Included in this study were 715 patients with MTC for whom histopathologic information was available for each lymph node removed. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients (10.1%) were diagnosed with lung metastasis, 58 patients (8.1%) with liver metastasis, and 34 patients (4.8%) with bone metastasis. Multivariate analyses were limited to patients revealing no more than 1 type of distant metastasis to avoid confounding by other distant metastasis. Extrathyroidal extension and 1 to 10 involved nodes indicated a small risk of lung metastasis [3%-4%; odds ratio (OR) 3-4], tumors greater than 40 mm and 11 to 20 involved nodes implied an intermediate risk (13%; OR 6), and more than 20 involved nodes entailed a high risk (26%-30%; OR 14-16). In the multivariate logistic regressions on liver and bone metastasis, in which the number of involved nodes was omitted on statistic grounds, extrathyroidal extension signified a strong risk of liver metastasis (19%, OR 23), whereas no clinical-pathologic variables were significantly associated with bone metastasis. Cumulative rates of lung, liver, and bone metastasis, plotted against the number of lymph node metastases, were similar. DISCUSSION: N categories encompassing 1 to 10 (N1), 11 to 20 (N2), and more than 20 (N3) lymph node metastases are important prognostic classifiers that should be incorporated into MTC staging systems for better risk stratification.
OBJECTIVE: This institutional study aimed at quantifying a medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) patient's risk of lung, liver, or bone metastasis. BACKGROUND: Without quantitative information regarding risk factors for lung, liver, and bone metastasis, risk stratification is liable to be haphazard, resulting in poor cost-effectiveness of screening programs. METHODS: Included in this study were 715 patients with MTC for whom histopathologic information was available for each lymph node removed. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients (10.1%) were diagnosed with lung metastasis, 58 patients (8.1%) with liver metastasis, and 34 patients (4.8%) with bone metastasis. Multivariate analyses were limited to patients revealing no more than 1 type of distant metastasis to avoid confounding by other distant metastasis. Extrathyroidal extension and 1 to 10 involved nodes indicated a small risk of lung metastasis [3%-4%; odds ratio (OR) 3-4], tumors greater than 40 mm and 11 to 20 involved nodes implied an intermediate risk (13%; OR 6), and more than 20 involved nodes entailed a high risk (26%-30%; OR 14-16). In the multivariate logistic regressions on liver and bone metastasis, in which the number of involved nodes was omitted on statistic grounds, extrathyroidal extension signified a strong risk of liver metastasis (19%, OR 23), whereas no clinical-pathologic variables were significantly associated with bone metastasis. Cumulative rates of lung, liver, and bone metastasis, plotted against the number of lymph node metastases, were similar. DISCUSSION: N categories encompassing 1 to 10 (N1), 11 to 20 (N2), and more than 20 (N3) lymph node metastases are important prognostic classifiers that should be incorporated into MTC staging systems for better risk stratification.
Authors: Samuel A Wells; Sylvia L Asa; Henning Dralle; Rossella Elisei; Douglas B Evans; Robert F Gagel; Nancy Lee; Andreas Machens; Jeffrey F Moley; Furio Pacini; Friedhelm Raue; Karin Frank-Raue; Bruce Robinson; M Sara Rosenthal; Massimo Santoro; Martin Schlumberger; Manisha Shah; Steven G Waguespack Journal: Thyroid Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Rachel K Voss; Lei Feng; Jeffrey E Lee; Nancy D Perrier; Paul H Graham; Samuel M Hyde; Frances Nieves-Munoz; Maria E Cabanillas; Steven G Waguespack; Gilbert J Cote; Robert F Gagel; Elizabeth G Grubbs Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Henning Dralle; Thomas J Musholt; Jochen Schabram; Thomas Steinmüller; Andreja Frilling; Dietmar Simon; Peter E Goretzki; Bruno Niederle; Christian Scheuba; Thomas Clerici; Michael Hermann; Jochen Kußmann; Kerstin Lorenz; Christoph Nies; Peter Schabram; Arnold Trupka; Andreas Zielke; Wolfram Karges; Markus Luster; Kurt W Schmid; Dirk Vordermark; Hans-Joachim Schmoll; Reinhard Mühlenberg; Otmar Schober; Harald Rimmele; Andreas Machens Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2013-03-03 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Lindsey E Moses; Jamie R Oliver; Janine M Rotsides; Qianhui Shao; Kepal N Patel; Luc G T Morris; Babak Givi Journal: Head Neck Date: 2020-10-27 Impact factor: 3.147