Literature DB >> 22967908

Quality of routine hospital birth records and the feasibility of their use for creating birth cohorts.

Joanna Murray1, Sonia Saxena, Neena Modi, Azeem Majeed, Paul Aylin, Alex Bottle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Linkage between routinely collected hospital birth and other records offers the potential for epidemiological and public health research by developing population-level birth cohorts with cradle-to-grave follow-up. Data from births in English National Health Service hospitals are collected in the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) database but are of uncertain quality.
METHODS: We examined the range and completeness of birth information recorded in HES and tested an approach for minimizing the effect of hospital-level variations by selecting hospitals with high completeness of recording (≥ 90%) for key fields. We discuss important methodological considerations when using routine healthcare data to develop a birth cohort.
RESULTS: The proportion of missing data in key birth record fields has been decreasing annually, such as gestational age and birth weight (from 46.2 and 43.9% in 2005/06 to 18.1 and 16.9% in 2009/10, respectively). We compared the important characteristics such as size and access to specialist neonatal care between 71 high-coding and 85 low-coding hospitals and found no significant differences, suggesting hospitals with high birth record completeness may be generalizable and representative of all hospitals.
CONCLUSIONS: The completeness of recording of hospital birth information varies greatly between hospitals in England but is improving. It may be preferable and valid to construct cohorts from only hospitals with high completeness of recording.

Entities:  

Keywords:  birth cohort; hospital admission records; hospital episode statistics; linkage; longitudinal data

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22967908     DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fds077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)        ISSN: 1741-3842            Impact factor:   2.341


  14 in total

1.  Risk factors for severe obstetric perineal lacerations.

Authors:  Marilene Vale de Castro Monteiro; Gláucia M Varella Pereira; Regina Amélia Pessoa Aguiar; Rodrigo Leite Azevedo; Mário Dias Correia-Junior; Zilma Silveira Nogueira Reis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Information technology infrastructure, quality improvement and research: the UK National Neonatal Research Database.

Authors:  Neena Modi
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2019-07

3.  The characteristics and health needs of pregnant women with schizophrenia compared with bipolar disorder and affective psychoses.

Authors:  Clare L Taylor; Robert Stewart; Jack Ogden; Matthew Broadbent; Dharmintra Pasupathy; Louise M Howard
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.630

4.  Sharing of clinical data in a maternity setting: how do paper hand-held records and electronic health records compare for completeness?

Authors:  Glenda Hawley; Claire Jackson; Julie Hepworth; Shelley A Wilkinson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-12-21       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Linking Data for Mothers and Babies in De-Identified Electronic Health Data.

Authors:  Katie Harron; Ruth Gilbert; David Cromwell; Jan van der Meulen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Data Resource Profile: Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care (HES APC).

Authors:  Annie Herbert; Linda Wijlaars; Ania Zylbersztejn; David Cromwell; Pia Hardelid
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Perinatal mortality associated with induction of labour versus expectant management in nulliparous women aged 35 years or over: An English national cohort study.

Authors:  Hannah E Knight; David A Cromwell; Ipek Gurol-Urganci; Katie Harron; Jan H van der Meulen; Gordon C S Smith
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  Protective Effects of Smoke-free Legislation on Birth Outcomes in England: A Regression Discontinuity Design.

Authors:  Ioannis Bakolis; Ruth Kelly; Daniela Fecht; Nicky Best; Christopher Millett; Kevin Garwood; Paul Elliott; Anna L Hansell; Susan Hodgson
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.822

9.  Risk factors for hospital admission with RSV bronchiolitis in England: a population-based birth cohort study.

Authors:  Joanna Murray; Alex Bottle; Mike Sharland; Neena Modi; Paul Aylin; Azeem Majeed; Sonia Saxena
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Timing of singleton births by onset of labour and mode of birth in NHS maternity units in England, 2005-2014: A study of linked birth registration, birth notification, and hospital episode data.

Authors:  Peter Martin; Mario Cortina-Borja; Mary Newburn; Gill Harper; Rod Gibson; Miranda Dodwell; Nirupa Dattani; Alison Macfarlane
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.