| Literature DB >> 22967536 |
Marc Elskens1, Daniel Vloeberghs, Liesbeth Van Elsen, Willy Baeyens, Leo Goeyens.
Abstract
For reasons of food safety, packaging and food contact materials must be submitted to migration tests. Testing of silicone moulds is often very laborious, since three replicate tests are required to decide about their compliancy. This paper presents a general modelling framework to predict the sample's compliance or non-compliance using results of the first two migration tests. It compares the outcomes of models with multiple continuous predictors with a class of models involving latent and dummy variables. The model's prediction ability was tested using cross and external validations, i.e. model revalidation each time a new measurement set became available. At the overall migration limit of 10 mg dm(-2), the relative uncertainty on a prediction was estimated to be ~10%. Taking the default values for α and β equal to 0.05, the maximum value that can be predicted for sample compliance was therefore 7 mg dm(-2). Beyond this limit the risk for false compliant results increases significantly, and a third migration test should be performed. The result of this latter test defines the sample's compliance or non-compliance. Propositions for compliancy control inspired by the current dioxin control strategy are discussed.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22967536 DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2012.05.034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Talanta ISSN: 0039-9140 Impact factor: 6.057