Literature DB >> 22967263

Adequate or not? A comparison of 24-hour urine studies for renal stone prevention by creatinine to weight ratio.

Mark D Sawyer1, Mary S Dietrich, Ryan B Pickens, S Duke Herrell, Nicole L Miller.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The intent of this study was to compare urine parameters between kidney stone formers with low, expected, and high creatinine to weight ratio (Cr/kg) and to discuss implications for treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 381 stone formers (205 females and 176 males) with urine collections for nephrolithiasis evaluation were included. Using the first collected sample, patients were grouped into low, expected, and high Cr/kg using sex appropriate reference ranges (15.0-20.0 mg/kg for females and 18.0-24.0 mg/kg for males) and evaluated.
RESULTS: Of initial collections, 50.7% were outside the Cr/kg reference range. Median age increased as Cr/kg decreased with 13 years age difference between low (56) and high (43) groups. Body mass index and weight also increased significantly with decreased ratio. No significant difference between groups was found for urine volume, total oxalate, oxalate concentration, pH, and supersaturations of calcium oxalate and uric acid. Total calcium, sodium, citrate, calcium concentration, supersaturation of calcium phosphate, and other parameters significantly increased with increased Cr/kg for the cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study to thoroughly evaluate the impact of Cr/kg on urine parameters. Clinicians should be cognizant of limitations of Cr/kg for evaluating collection adequacy. It is especially important to consider Cr/kg when there is potential for undertreatment or overtreatment of patients with abnormal Cr/kg. Studies demonstrating hypercalciuria and high Cr/kg may need to be repeated before starting thiazide diuretics. Further studies are needed to determine how to better interpret urine components that vary with Cr/kg ratio.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22967263     DOI: 10.1089/end.2012.0203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  4 in total

Review 1.  Improving Compliance with 24-H Urine Collections: Understanding Inadequacies in the Collection Process and Risk Factors for Poor Compliance.

Authors:  Alice Xiang; Alex Nourian; Eric Ghiraldi; Justin I Friedlander
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Accuracy in 24-hour Urine Collection at a Tertiary Center.

Authors:  Carter Boyd; Kyle Wood; Dustin Whitaker; Omotola Ashorobi; Lisa Harvey; Robert Oster; Ross P Holmes; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2018

3.  Predictive Factors for Achieving the Recommended AUA Daily Urine Production in Patients With Nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  Kimberly Tay; Anojan Navaratnam; Sean McAdams; Mira Keddis; Matthew Neville; Mitchell R Humphreys
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2019-05-27

4.  False elevations in urinary metanephrines: under-recognised pitfall with 24-hour urinary volume collection.

Authors:  Terry Shin; Thanh Duc Hoang; Mary Thomas Plunkett; Mohamed K M Shakir
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2021-02-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.