Literature DB >> 22967037

Extended pelvic lymph node dissection including internal iliac packet should be performed during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.

Jae Hung Jung1, Joo Wan Seo, Meng Shi Lim, Jae Won Lee, Byung Ha Chung, Sung Joon Hong, Jae Mann Song, Koon Ho Rha.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The indication and anatomic limits of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) have not been clearly defined. Therefore, we assessed whether the extent of PLND at robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) had any benefit on lymph node yield, staging accuracy, and biochemical recurrence (BCR) in patients with high-risk prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 2005 and July 2010, a retrospective analysis was performed on 200 patients with high-risk prostate cancer stratified by D'Amico classification. The study population was divided into different groups: patients in Group 1 had standard PLND, and Group 2 had extended PLND (ePLND). The clinicopathologic findings of patients and surgical outcomes of PLND with each procedure were measured. Kaplan-Meier and log rank tests were used to estimate BCR-free survival rates. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were done with the Cox proportional hazard regression model.
RESULTS: Medians of 15 (interquartile range, 11-19) and 24 (interquartile range, 18-28) lymph nodes were dissected in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P<.001). The incidences of lymph node metastasis were 5.2% (8/155) in Group 1 and 22.2% (10/45) in Group 2. Regardless of the extent of PLND, the patients with positive lymph nodes had a significantly lower BCR-free survival than those with negative lymph nodes. Twenty-five percent (7/27) of positive lymph nodes were in the internal iliac packet and common iliac packet. In particular, of the positive internal iliac nodes, 75% (3/4) of nodes were found in that location, exclusively.
CONCLUSIONS: An ePLND that identifies patients with lymph node metastasis including the internal iliac packet during RALP provides an accurate pathologic staging and may have survival benefits in high-risk prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22967037     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2011.0516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  17 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies on the efficacy of extended pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with clinically localized prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  Liang Gao; Lu Yang; Xiao Lv; Siyuan Bu; Fan Wan; Shengqiang Qian; Qiang Wei; Ping Han; Tianyong Fan
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Current status of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ilija Aleksic; Tyler Luthringer; Vladimir Mouraviev; David M Albala
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-12-11

Review 3.  Is extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer the only recommended option? A systematic over-view of the literature.

Authors:  Thomas Rees; Nicholas Raison; Mohammed Iqbal Sheikh; Zahra Jaffry; Sanjeev Madaan; Ben Challacombe; Kamran Ahmed; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-12

Review 4.  Therapeutic Value of Standard Versus Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Michele Colicchia; Vidit Sharma; Firas Abdollah; Alberto Briganti; R Jeffrey Karnes
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Extended pelvic lymph node dissection at the time of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Impact of surgical volume on efficacy and complications in a single-surgeon series.

Authors:  Giovanni Battista Di Pierro; Pietro Grande; Johann Gregory Wirth; Hansjörg Danuser; Agostino Mattei
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 6.  PET imaging for lymph node dissection in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Elena Incerti; Paola Mapelli; Luigi Gianolli; Maria Picchio
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Cytoreductive prostatectomy: evidence in support of a new surgical paradigm (Review).

Authors:  Izak Faiena; Eric A Singer; Chris Pumill; Isaac Y Kim
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 5.650

Review 8.  Robotic radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer: current perspectives.

Authors:  Abdullah Erdem Canda; Mevlana Derya Balbay
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

9.  Clinical value of extended pelvic lymph node dissection in patients subjected to radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jakub Dobruch; Sebastian Piotrowicz; Michał Skrzypczyk; Tomasz Gołąbek; Piotr Chłosta; Andrzej Borówka
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 1.195

Review 10.  Extended lymph node dissection in robotic radical prostatectomy: Current status.

Authors:  Sameer Chopra; Mehrdad Alemozaffar; Inderbir Gill; Monish Aron
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.